Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Seperumal vs Ganesan

Seperumal vs Ganesan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Oct 29, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1801152

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL A/411/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Seperumal

Respondent

Ganesan

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 29-10-2025coramthe honourable mr.justice d.bharatha chakravarthy seperumal s/o. azhaga padaiyachi, ponparappi village (karaippatti street), sendurai taluk, ariyalur district. appellant(s) vs ganesan s/o. sakthivel, no.9, sbi colony, cuddalore. respondent(s) prayer this criminal appeal is filed under section 378 (4) of the criminal procedure code, to set aside the judgment dated 10.12.2021 made in c.a.no.07 of 2020 on the file of the learned principal district & sessions court, ariyalur and upheld the judgment passed in stc.no.158 of 2019 dated 09.11.2020 on the file of the learned district munsif-cum-judicial magistrate, sendurai. for appellant(s): mr. k.sasindran for respondent(s): no appearanceorderwhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the matter has since been settled out of court. he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. 2.recording the same, the criminal appeal stands disposed of. tsg index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the principal district & sessions court, ariyalur 2.the district munsif-cum-judicial magistrate, sendurai. 3.the public prosecutor, madras high court. d.bharatha chakravarthy j. tsg

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-10-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Seperumal S/o. Azhaga Padaiyachi, Ponparappi Village (Karaippatti Street), Sendurai Taluk, Ariyalur District. Appellant(s) Vs Ganesan S/o. Sakthivel, No.9, Sbi Colony, Cuddalore. Respondent(s) PRAYER This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment dated 10.12.2021 made in C.A.No.07 of 2020 on the file of the learned Principal District & Sessions Court, Ariyalur and upheld the judgment passed in STC.No.158 of 2019 dated 09.11.2020 on the file of the learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sendurai. For Appellant(s): Mr. K.Sasindran For Respondent(s): No appearance

ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the matter has since been settled out of Court. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2.Recording the same, the Criminal Appeal stands disposed of. Tsg Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Principal District & Sessions Court, Ariyalur 2.The District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sendurai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. Tsg

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial