Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

N.Murugan vs the Managing Director

N.Murugan vs The Managing Director

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Oct 24, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1776751

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/4071/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.Murugan

Respondent

The Managing Director

Excerpt

.....to tasmac wine shop no.4086, situated at no.1/31, muthu mariamman koil street, manimangalam village, chengalpet.2. when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. page no. 2 of 53. the learned government advocate for the respondents 1 and 2submits that the license has been given to h2/third respondent on 06.10.2025 as the petitioner failed to comply with the tender conditions and therefore, bar license earlier issued to the petitioner has been cancelled and re-allotted to the third respondent. therefore, no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition.4. recording the above submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to workout the remedy for refund of the amounts paid to the respondents.5. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 24.10.2025 neutral citation : yes / no index:yes/nospeaking order/non-speaking orderkak to:1. the managing director, page no. 3 of 5 tamil nadu state marketing corporation ltd., th 4 floor, thalamuthu nadarasan maligai, egmore, chennai - 8.2. the district manager, tamil nadu state marketing corporation ltd., kancheepuram (north) kancheepuram district. page no. 4 of 5c.saravanan, j.kak 24.10.2025 page no. 5 of 5

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.10.2025

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.4394 & 4395 of 2024 N.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., th 4 Floor, Thalamuthu Nadarasan Maligai, Egmore, Chennai - 8.

2. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Kancheepuram (North) Kancheepuram District.

3. G.Ramamoorthy ... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of 2 nd respondent made in Na.Ka.No.787/A3/2023 dated 22.01.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue license in favour of the petitioner to run the bar attached to TASMAC wine shop No.4086, Page No. 1 of 5 situated at No.1/31, Muthu Mariamman Koil Street, Manimangalam Village, Chengalpet. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Balakrishnan Government Advocate (TASMAC) (For R1 & R2) Mr.N.Shanmuga Thayumanavan (For R3)

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed to quash the order dated 22.01.2024 made in Na.Ka.No.787/A3/2023, passed by the 2nd respondent and also to direct the 2nd respondent to issue license in favour of the petitioner to run the bar attached to TASMAC wine shop No.4086, situated at No.1/31, Muthu Mariamman Koil Street, Manimangalam Village, Chengalpet.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Page No. 2 of 5

3. The learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 and 2

submits that the license has been given to H2/third respondent on 06.10.2025 as the petitioner failed to comply with the tender conditions and therefore, bar License earlier issued to the petitioner has been cancelled and re-allotted to the third respondent. Therefore, no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition.

4. Recording the above submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to workout the remedy for refund of the amounts paid to the respondents.

5. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 24.10.2025 Neutral Citation : Yes / No Index:Yes/No

Speaking order/Non-Speaking order

kak To:

1. The Managing Director, Page No. 3 of 5 Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., th 4 Floor, Thalamuthu Nadarasan Maligai, Egmore, Chennai - 8.

2. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Kancheepuram (North) Kancheepuram District. Page No. 4 of 5

C.SARAVANAN, J.

kak 24.10.2025 Page No. 5 of 5

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties N.Murugan vs The Managing Director Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales