Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Murugan vs the State Rep by Its,

Murugan vs The State Rep by Its,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1706863

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/1307/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murugan

Respondent

The State Rep by Its,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.01.2025coramthe hon'ble mr. justice a.d.jagadish chandira murugan s/o.venkattapa, no.211/4, podur, kottaiyur, denkanikottai, krishnagiri 635 102. appellant(s) vs the state rep by its, respondent(s) for appellant(s): k.vasantanayagan l.ramanathan r.reshma for respondent(s): s.santhosh government advocate (criminal side),madras high court.orderthis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner that the petitioner should report before the respondent police until further orers.a.d.jagadish chandira.,j.sma2. the learned govt. advocate (crl.side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this court and the investigation is pending.3. considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of offence, thecondition imposed on the petitioner in crl.m.p.no.16508 of 2024 in crl.o.p.no.26998 of 2024 dated 26.11.2024, is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on the first saturday of every month at 10.30 a.m until further orders.4. accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. 30.01.2025 sma to

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.01.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA MURUGAN S/o.Venkattapa, No.211/4, Podur, Kottaiyur, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri 635 102. Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep By Its, Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): K.Vasantanayagan L.Ramanathan R.Reshma For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.

ORDER

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner that the petitioner should report before the respondent police until further orers.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.

Sma

2. The Learned Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court and the investigation is pending.

3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of offence, the

condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.16508 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.26998 of 2024 dated 26.11.2024, is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on the first Saturday of every month at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

4. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. 30.01.2025 Sma To

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial