Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Divisional Manager vs Rubistar

The Divisional Manager vs Rubistar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 02, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1781772

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/4045/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Manager

Respondent

Rubistar

Excerpt

cmp.no.4045 of 2024 in cma.sr.no.100150 of 2024m.dhandapani, j.this petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 138 days in filing the above appeal.2. though notice was served and the name of the 1st respondent was printed in the cause list, none appeared on behalf of the 1st respondent.3. learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant submitted that the 2nd respondent was already set as ex-parte before the trial court. an endorsement to the said effect was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/ appellant in the petition today.4. in view of the above, notice to the 2nd respondent is dispensed with.5. heard learned counsel on either side.6. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this court is inclined to order this petition.7. accordingly this petition is allowed. registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission. 02.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

CMP.No.4045 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.100150 of 2024

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 138 days in filing the above appeal.

2. Though notice was served and the name of the 1st respondent was printed in the cause list, none appeared on behalf of the 1st respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/

appellant submitted that the 2nd respondent was already set as ex-parte before the trial court. An endorsement to the said effect was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/ appellant in the petition today.

4. In view of the above, notice to the 2nd respondent is dispensed with.

5. Heard learned counsel on either side.

6. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.

7. Accordingly this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission. 02.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties The Divisional Manager vs Rubistar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales