Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Julie vs State by

JULIE vs State by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 06, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1721244

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/2481/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JULIE

Respondent

State by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 06.01.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice p.velmurugan and crl.m.p.no.1390 of 2023 julie ... petitioner vs.1. state by the inspector of police, chennai, crime no.700 of 2022.2. jency dayalan ... respondentsprayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 cr.p.c./ 528 bnss 2023, to call for the records in f.i.r in crime no.700 of 2022 dated 22.11.2022 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same against the petitioner. for petitioner : mr.m.jaikumar for respondents : mr.s.sugendran additional public prosecutor for r1orderthis criminal original petition is filed to quash the f.i.r in crime no.700 of 2022 dated 22.11.2022 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent-police against the petitioner.2. learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the firstrespondent-police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in crime no.700 of 2022 final report was filed before the learned judicial magistrate -ii, tambaram and the same was taken on file in c.c.no.374 of 2024.3. since the first respondent-police has completed theinvestigation and filed the final report before the learned magistrate concerned, nothing survives for adjudication in this criminal original petition. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedy in the manner known to law.ms to1. the judicial magistrate-ii, tambaram. 2.the inspector of police, chennai. 3.the public prosecutor, high court, madras. p.velmurugan, j ms (2/2)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.1390 of 2023 Julie ... Petitioner Vs.

1. State by The Inspector of Police, Chennai, Crime No.700 of 2022.

2. Jency Dayalan ... Respondents

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records in F.I.R in Crime No.700 of 2022 dated 22.11.2022 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jaikumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.700 of 2022 dated 22.11.2022 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent-Police against the petitioner.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first

respondent-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.700 of 2022 final report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate -II, Tambaram and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.374 of 2024.

3. Since the first respondent-Police has completed the

investigation and filed the final report before the learned Magistrate concerned, nothing survives for adjudication in this Criminal Original Petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedy in the manner known to law.

ms To

1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tambaram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms (2/2)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial