Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Sethuramayee Vs. The Registrar, The Inspector General of Registrati ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.05.2014 to cancel the Document No.622/1995 dated 28.02.1995 registered before the 2nd respondent within a stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard the Learned counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondents. 2. According to the Petitioner, she is the only daughter of her parents and after the demise of her parents, who had acquired properties (through their hard-earned money) at survey No.2731 at Bodi Town, Theni District, Survey No.174/3, Bodi Village, Manavalazhapuram and in survey No.59 at Bodi North Malai Village respectively, a settlement deed dated 30.09.1960 was registered by the petitioner. 3. The stand of the Petitioner is that subsequently to her shock and surprise, she came to know that illegal children were born to his father thro...
C. Chelladurai Vs. The Inspector of Police, Andipatti Police Station, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.1278 of 2016, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Theni, dated 27th day of May 2016 and directing the respondent to return the Vehicle Chevarlet Tavera bearing registration No.TN01 Y9837 for interim custody to the petitioner which seized by the respondent Police from the petitioner in Crime No.754 of 2015, on 20.05.2016 and the same was produced before the Court and remanded in R.P.R.No.11 of 2016 pending investigation.) 1. This matter is squarely covered by the Apex Court's Judgment in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat [2003 (1) CTC 175 (SC)]. 2. The revision petitioner herein is the registered owner of Chevarlet Tavera Car (TN01 Y9837), which has been used in the commission of the offence. The said Car has been seized and has been concerned in this case. 3. The revision pe...
Anthoniyappa and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners under guise of enquiry on the basis of complaint given by one Manohari except under due process of law and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court.Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry and proceed in accordance with law.Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents and their officials not to harass the petitioner and his family members unnecessarily against law under the guise of enquiry.) 1. Thi...
Selvi Vs. The District Collector, Nagercoil and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property bearing S.No.640/3 measuring to an extent of 0.21.0 acres at Therisanamkoppu Village, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District, by the Petitioner, forthwith.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the property bearing S.No.640/3 measuring to an extent of 0.121.0 acres situated at Therisanamkoppu Village, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District is an agricultural property and originally belonging to the Government as 'Revenue Poramboke'. Indeed, 35 years before, the said property was given to the Petitioner by the respondents for the purpose of carrying out agricultural operation and thereby to eke out her livelihood. 4. The learned counsel for the Petitio...
S. Saibullahkhan Vs. Hairunisha Beevi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 24.03.2016 made in I.A.No. 259 of 2016 in O.S.No.26 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ramanathapuram and return the plaint for presentation in the Court. ) 1. Heard Mr.V.Sitharanjandas, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.J.Barathan, learned Counsel appearing for the first respondent. 2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram in I.A.No.259 of 2016 in O.S.No.26 of 2008. The third defendant in the suit is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. 3. Facts in brief: The first respondent had instituted the suit on 09.04.2008 against the respondents 2 and 3 herein for declaration and permanent injunction. At the time of institution of the suit, the suit property was valued for a sum of Rs. 2,70,000/- and a sum of Rs. 10,125/- was paid for declaratory relief and a ...
Raja Vs. State, Rep. by its The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pudukottai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by Learned District Munsif-cum-Learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, in Cr.M.P.No.5370 of 2015, dated 14.12.2015 and set aside the same and direct the Learned Judicial Magistrate to give interim custody of the Hero Honda Splendor Plus bearing registration No.TN-55-AFS-2442.) 1. This matter is squarely covered by the Apex Court's Judgment in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat [2003 (1) CTC 175 (SC)]. 2. The revision petitioner herein is A2 in this case. He is stated to have driven Hero Honda Splendor Plus (TN55 AFS2442) in Ponnamaravathi area to hunt Peacocks. The victim is a Peacock. The respondent Police registered a case in Crime No.97 of 2014. Seized the said two-wheeler. Produced it before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam. 3. In the said Court, the revision petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.5370 of 2015 for interim custody of the ...
M. Ayyankalai Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner without following due process of law on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2016.) 1. The petitioner has submitted a representation dated 21.04.2016 to the respondents, requesting them not to harass him in respect of a civil dispute. Since no action was taken on the said representation, the petitioner has approached this Court with the aforesaid prayer. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents, the enquiry as against the petitioner is over and after closure of the enquiry, it has been sent for opinion of the legal experts. 4. Under such circumstances, there is no scope for calling the petitioner again to the respondent police either in the guise of enquiry or in the guise of anything else. Therefore, recording the submission made by the learned G...
Senthil Kumar Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner by interfering with the civil dispute on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 23.04.2016.) 1. The petitioner has submitted a representation dated 23.04.2016 to the 1st respondent directing the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in respect of a civil dispute. Since no action was taken on the said representation, the petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer stated supra. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), enquiry has been conducted in this case and it has been subsequently closed on 14.03.2016. He has further submitted that since the complaint has already been closed, there is no scope for harassment at all. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
S.B. Rajarethinam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner herein is a dialysis patient and therefore, the requirement of the petitioner's repeated appearance before the respondent police would cause harassment to him. 4. Per contra, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents has submitted that already the statement of the petitioner has been recorded and his presence is no more required in this case. 5. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of....
T. Pitchaikani Vs. The Special Tahsildar, Virudhunagar District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/1213/1983 dated Nil-05-2013 and quash the same as illegal.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 2. The Petitioner has focussed the instant writ petition before this court seeking to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No. A1/1213/1983 dated Nil - 05-2013 and to quash the same as an illegal one. 3. The Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner was served with the impugned memorandum order in Na.Ka.No. A1/1213/1983 dated Nil- 05-2013, passed by the respondent/Special Tahsildar (Adhi Diravidar Welfare), Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District, whereby and whereunder, the petitioner was informed that he is in occupation of the house and land in S.Nos.30/9, 10, 12,...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »