Anthoniyappa and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police and Others

Anthoniyappa and Others vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 01, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190901

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190901
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Dr. (Mrs.) Justice S. Vimala
Decided On: Jun 01, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P. (MD) No. 7275, 7340, 7428, 7480, 7618 of 2016 & 7562 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anthoniyappa and Others

Respondent

State Represented by The Inspector of Police and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners under guise of enquiry on the basis of complaint given by one manohari except under due process of law and pass such further or other orders as this honourable court.criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry and proceed in accordance with law.criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., to direct the respondents and their officials not to harass the petitioner and his family members unnecessarily against law under the guise of enquiry.) 1. this petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry. 2. heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. according to the learned government advocate (crl.side), based on the complaint lodged by one manohari, enquiry has been conducted and it has been subsequently closed on 28.04.2016. he has further submitted that since the complaint has already been closed, there is no scope for harassment at all. 4. recording the submission made by the learned government advocate (crl.side), this criminal original petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners under guise of enquiry on the basis of complaint given by one Manohari except under due process of law and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court.Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2^nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry and proceed in accordance with law.Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2^nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2^nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents and their officials not to harass the petitioner and his family members unnecessarily against law under the guise of enquiry.)

1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side.

3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), based on the complaint lodged by one Manohari, enquiry has been conducted and it has been subsequently closed on 28.04.2016. He has further submitted that since the complaint has already been closed, there is no scope for harassment at all.

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Anthoniyappa and Others vs State Represented by The Inspector... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge The Honourable Dr. (Mrs.) Justice S. Vimala