Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-30-2016
1. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. However, this Court has heard the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing the respondent. 2. The Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing the respondent submits that as per the direction of this Court issued in W.P.(MD).No.18020 of 2014, dated 10.11.2014 and the recommendation of the Special Tahsildar (SSS), Thovalai, Kanyakumari District, a proposal, for sanctioning a sum of Rs.92,500/- i.e a sum of Rs.90,000/- towards accident relief and Rs.2,500/- towards personal expenses to the petitioner for the death of her husband, was sent to the Commissioner of Land Reforms, as per the respondent's Office letter dated 29.12.2014 and the same was informed to the petitioner, through a registered communication dated 29.12.2014. It appears that the Commissioner of Land Reforms has also sent the said proposal to the Government for sanctioning the aforesaid amount towards the petitioner, as per letter dated 12.03.2015. 3. I...
Felix Suresh Peter Vs. The Inspector of Police, Peraiyur Police Statio ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-30-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to consider the petitioner filed to recall the non bailable warrant dated 24.05.2016 issued against the petitioner by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, on the same day.) Liberty is the natural and inalienable right of every human being recognised and protected by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Complaining that the personal liberty of the petitioner is infringed, except in accordance with the procedure established by law, this petition has been filed by the Inspector of Police, Nanguneri Circle, seeking to quash the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, issuing Non Bailable Warrant against him dated 24.05.2016 [despite the filing of the application seeking to condone his absence]. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the first respondent. In view of the limited relief sought for by the petitione...
A. Devendran Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endo ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-30-2016
(Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.01.2016 and grant lease to the petitioner in respect of land in Survey No.79/2 of an extent 11.7.50 hectares and Survey No.81/3Q of an extent of 1.57.50 hectares in Mumbalai Village, Manamelkudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.) 1. Heard the petitioner (party-in-person) and the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for R-1 and R-2 and also the Learned Counsel appearing for R-3. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, the dry lands in sy.No.79/2 measuring an extent of 11.7.50 hectares and sy.No.81/3 measuring an extent of 1.57.50 hectares, situate in Mumbalai Village, Manamelkudi Taluk, belongs to Arulmigu Balasubramaniyasamy Thirukovil, Nagaram, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. He is a resident of village nearby and he is...
P. Ramachandran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep.by Secretary to Government ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating with the order of the first respondent made in G.O.(D)No.369, Public Works (E1) Department dated 29.12.2014 and quash the same as it is arbitrary and illegal and in consequence to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as accordance with the petitioner's service seniority from the year 2009 and with all attended benefits.) 1. Mr.P.Ramachandran, while serving as Assistant Executive Engineer in Public Works Department Buildings (CandM) Sub-division at Dindigul, was issued with a charge memo No.CII(3)/5219/2007-15, dated 10.09.2009, by the third respondent, containing three charges. The first charge is that the petitioner has failed to verify whether special repair works had been executed as per the estimated quantity and also failed to check whether the correct measurement had been recorded in 'M Book' written by the...
Rajadurai Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secreta ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-30-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 01.12.2008 made in W.P(MD)No.10930 of 2008.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. None appears for the appellant. 2. This Writ Appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner against the order dated 01.12.2008 dismissing the writ petition, which in turn has been instituted seeking a direction to the respondents to consider his case for employment on compassionate ground. 3. It appears that the father of the writ petitioner was working as Assistant Agriculture Officer under the control of the Director, Horticulture and Hill Crops Department, Chepauk, Chennai. Unfortunately, he met with untimely death on 02.09.1982, in harness. The writ petitioner submitted an application more than 12 years later and on 02.12.1994, seeking for employment to be provided to him on compassionate ground. Since no such employment has been provided for, the writ petition came to be instituted. 4. The State Government has introduced ...
Rajamani Vs. The Inspector General of Registration, Tamil Nadu Registr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-30-2016
(Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.03.2016 to cancel the Fraudulent Gift Deed registered in Document No.1317/2015 dated 17.06.2015 with respect to the properties comprised in Survey No.68/2 (sub divided) measuring an extent of 89 cents which situates at Ambadurai Village, Aathur Taluk, Chinnalapatty Sub Division, Dindigul District and the same to take appropriate action within a stipulated time.) 1. Heard the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that his representation dated 26.03.2016, addressed to the respondents 1 to 3, seeking to cancel the fraudulent gift deed dated 17.06.2015 has not seen the light of the day till date. Hence, he has filed the present writ petition before this Court. 3. According to the...
M. Kaliammal Vs. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-30-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to issue a Patta to the extent of 3.41.5, 0.40.0 Ares bearing Survey No.35 situated at Nanjai Mangudi Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai Distirct.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter is filed. 3. According to the Petitioner, she is in possession of wet land bearing Sy.No.35, measuring about 3.41.5, 0.40.0 ares in door No.31, Mangudi Village, Poovattakudi Post, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. From the year 1987, she is in possession of the land and she is cultivating the said land ever since 30.09.1987. For every fasli, she had paid the amount demanded by the Government. As such, she is in possession and enjoyment of the land for the past 30 years. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that she had approached the first and second respondents several times seeking issu...
M. Latha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to take necessary action to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband, namely, S.Arun, S/o.Sankaran and his family members and consequently direct the 1st respondent to forbear the respondent nos.4 and 5 and the henchmen of the respondents 4 and 5 from interfering with the peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioner.) 1. The writ petition has been filed, seeking to direct the 1st respondent to take necessary action to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband, namely, S.Arun, S/o.Sankaran and his family members and consequently direct the 1st respondent to forbear the respondent nos.4 and 5 and their henchmen from interfering with the peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioner. 2. Heard the petitioner / party-in-person and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the responden...
K. Kalaiyarasi Vs. State represented by, The District Collector and Di ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records from the first respondent in N.S.A.No.01/2016, dated 21.01.2016 by setting aside the said order of detention passed by the first respondent and setting the detenu Kathirvelsamy, aged 39 years, S/o.Thenkarai Maharaja Thalaivar, at liberty now detained in the Central Prison, Palayamkottai.) 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed by the wife of the detenu, by name Kathirvelsamy, detained by the District Collector -cum- District Magistrate, Tirunelveli, by order dated 21 January, 2016. SUMMARY OF FACTS: 2. The husband of the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the detenu') was arrayed as an accused in Crime No.139 of 2015 under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code. Since the detenu and his men murdered a member of Mohammedan Community, normal life has been affected throughout Eruvadi and surrounding locality. The police produced the detenu before the Jud...
Su. Shanmugam Vs. The District Collector, Trichy District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 2 to 4 to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2016 and pass an appropriate order on merits in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble court on strength of direction issued by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 3. It comes to be known that the petitioner along with his three brothers as early as on 03.03.2016 had addressed a representation dated 03.03.2016 (through RPAD) to the second respondent/District Revenue Officer, Trichy District, praying for proportionate, separate patta, based on the judgment passed in W.A.No.1210 of 2001 dated 06.07.2006 (in respect of 3 acres and 15 cents in their enjoyment) and it appears that till date, the said representation is pending. In this connect...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »