Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thangapandi Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned Patta No.403 issued by the second respondent for the lands comprised in Survey No.604(1) and (2) situated at Oruthattu Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District in favour of the third respondent and quash the same consequently direct the second respondent to restore the patta for the above lands in the name of the petitioner as before and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed....
R. Arumugam Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Alankula ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi to complete the trial expeditiously in C.C.No.218 of 2015 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi to complete the trial expeditiously in C.C.No.218 of 2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. Taking into consideration the volume of cases on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, this Court cannot issue a time bound direction to complete the trial. Under such circumstances, the Trial Court is directed to expeditiously complete the trial in C.C.No.218 of 2015....
Nagalingam Vs. The Superintendent of Police and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to expedite investigation in Cr.No.777 of 2015 dated 31.10.2015 and file a final report with in time prescribed by this Honourable Court in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to expedite investigation in Cr.No.777 of 2015 dated 31.10.2015 and file a final report with in time prescribed by this Honourable Court in accordance with law. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expedit...
Amirthakani Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent's impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.14752/2007/C dated 03.08.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently forbearing the respondents in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's plot No.11 comprised in Old Survey No.994/1A, Ward No.5, Block No.33, T.S.No.116, Arappalayam Main Road, Madurai-625 016 and to pas such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent's impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.14752/2007/C dated 03.08.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, forbear the respondents in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's plot No.11 comprised in Old Survey...
M/s. Texsyard International, Karur District Vs. The Assessment Commiss ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayers: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in its impugned proceedings made in TIN.33953660834/2012-13 dated 02.12.2015 and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in its impugned proceedings made in VAT Appeal No. and Year 266/2014 dated 16.02.2015 and quash the same as being violative of the principles of natural justice and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Common Order 1. Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions is similar, they are taken up together for hearing and disposed of by this common order. 2. The first writ petition in W.P(MD)No.470 of 2016 has been filed challenging the assessment...
State through B. Mohan, Special Public Prosecutor Vs. O. Raja and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the order in Cr.M.P.No.828 of 2016 in S.C.No.112 of 2015, dated 07.04.2016, on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul and consequently to direct the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul District, to array the four police officials as additional accused.) 1. The petitioner has filed this criminal original petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking set aside of the Order, dated 07.04.2016, passed in Cr.M.P.No.828 of 2016 in S.C.No.112 of 2015, by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul and to direct the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul District, to array four more police officials as additional accused. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. It is seen that the petitioner was appointed as a Special Public Prosecutor to prosecute the accused in S.C.No.112 of 2015, pending on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Ju...
Balasubramanyan Vs. The Inspector General of Registration Santhome Che ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of declaration to declare that the registration of the Deed of Revocation of the Gift Deed dated 23.07.2013 registered as Doc.No.363 of 2013 on the file of the second respondent in respect of the property bearing S.No.106/11H3 with an extent of 3270 square foot of land, equivalent to 7 1/2 cents on West, out of total extent of 15 cents at Kalakudy Revenue Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District is illegal and against the provisions of the Registration Act and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking to issue a Writ of declaration to declare that the registration of the Deed of Revocation of the Gift Deed dated 23.07.2013 registered as Doc.No.363 of 2013 on the file of the second respondent in respect of the property bearing S.No.106/11H3 with an extent of 3270 square foot of land, equiv...
Loganathan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to investigate expeditiously in their Station in Crime No.601 of 2015 and lay a final report within a stipulated time limit as fixed by this Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to investigate expeditiously in their Station in Crime No.601 of 2015 and lay a final report within a stipulated time limit as fixed by this Court. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that on the complaint given by one RajaramHeard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 09.04.2014 given by the petitioner, petition enquiry in CSR No.193 of 2014 was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 13.04.2016. A copy of the closure report is furnis...
S. Sureshkumar Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 26.11.2015 and further direct him to investigate the matter in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 26.11.2015 and further direct him to investigate the matter in accordance with law. 2. The petitioner sent a complaint dated 26.11.2015 by post to the respondent police alleging that one Ida Suguna Mary and others had collected Rs.2,00,000/- from him on the promise of getting a job for his brother in Canada. The Inspector of Police, South Gate Police Station, Madurai conducted enquiry on the complaint by summoning both parties on 10.12.2015. During the enquiry, it appears that the petitioner had not paid Rs.2,00,000/- to Ida Sugana Mary, but only Rs.1,00,000/- to Ida Suguna Mary, which she had agreed to return to th...
U. Kannan Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Tirunelvel ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District to expedite the trial in C.C.No.54 of 2014 on its file and complete the same within the time limit as fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District to expedite the trial in C.C.No.54 of 2014 on its file and complete the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that a charge sheet in this case has been filed in the year 2016 and also number of cases pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District, this Court cannot issue a direcction to the Magistrate to conplete the trial in a time bound manner. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Trial Court and give evidence. Learned Judicial Mag...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »