Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhanushkodi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 7.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 7.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 07.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 07.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With the above direction, this Criminal...
P. Ravichandran Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.03.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.03.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 08.03.2016, it is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite party threatened him on 07.02.2016 saying that he will create a promissory note for Rs.2,00,000/- as if the petitioner has executed the same and he will file suits against him in various Courts. 4. The allegation in the complaint appears to be very vague and hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this petition ...
M. Sulfath Beevi and Others Vs. Sara Banu and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer in both Transfer CMPs: The Transfer CMPs are filed to withdraw the Appeals in A.S.Nos.26 and 27 of 2005 on the file of I Additional District Court, Thirunelveli and transfer the same to the file of High Court, Madurai.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed....
Vanitha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 11.01.2016 and initiate necessary action in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 11.01.2016 and initiate necessary action in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint, earlier given by the petitioner for the same set of facts was enquired into and was closed on 11.01.2016. A copy of the closure report is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law....
K. Balasubramanian Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner complaint dated 14.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner complaint dated 14.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 14.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Pandian Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 26.2.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 26.2.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 26.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 3rd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 26.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with l...
Murugesan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the case on the basis of petitioner's complaint dated 3.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the case on the basis of petitioner's complaint dated 3.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint, given by one Sudhakar, who is none other than the son of the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.81 of 2016 on 12.04.2016 for offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Allapichai Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 17.3.2016 on the file of the respondent police and to investigate the same in accordance with law and also issue suitable direction against the 1st respondent to supervise the whole investigation.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 17.3.2016 on the file of the respondent police and to investigate the same in accordance with law and also issue suitable direction against the 1st respondent to supervise the whole investigation. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 17.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh compl...
A. Latha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, The Inspector of Police, An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents herein to register FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 4.12.2015 made by the petitioner herein and investigate the matter in accordance with law and file final report before the concerned J.M. within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents herein to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 04.12.2015 made by the petitioner herein and investigate the matter in accordance with law and file final report before the concerned Magistrate Court 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 04.12.2015, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 30.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner ...
D. Palanivel Vs. P.L. Jayalakshmi
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer to call for the records to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.87 of 2015 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, pending on the file of the Fast Track Judge (Magisterial Level), Karaikudi.) 1. For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to as 'the complainant' and 'the accused'. 2. It is the case of the complainant that Sundarambal, wife of the accused is a member of Women Self Help Group in Kottaiyur, in which the complainant is also a member, on account of which the complainant and Sundarambal had close friendship. In view of this, the accused approached the complainant for a loan of Rs.4.50 lakhs on interest, for his family expenses, during the first week of January, 2015. Sundarambal also requested the complainant to give loan to the accused. 3. The complainant borrowed Rs.4.50 lakhs from her bother Devarajan and on 25.1.2015 gave the same to the accused in the presence of Sundaramb...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »