Chennai Madurai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manickam Pillai Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-24-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the first respondent in Pa.Mu.52393/2013(B6) dated 24.12.2014 and quash the same and pass further orders as this may deem fit.)1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the first respondent in Pa.Mu.52393/2013(B6) dated 24.12.2014.2. The only ground which has been raised by the petitioner is that the respondents 4 to 9 are at loggerheads regarding the title over the property. In fact, a counter has been filed to the effect that there is a dispute regarding the title. The District Revenue Officer who decided the application for patta, has no power to decide the title dispute. The title can be decided only by the civil Court. Now, he contended that he preferred to go before the civil Court.3. The learned counsel appearing f...
S.M. Shoba Vs. The Joint Secretary (PSP) and Passport Officer and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Respondent No.2 to take necessary action to impound the Passport of the respondent Nos.4 and 5 in the light of section 10 of the Passport Act considering the pendency of the criminal case against respondent Nos. 4 and 5 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Mandamus to direct the second respondent to impound the passport of the respondents 4 and 5 in the light of section 10 of the Passport Act considering the pendency of the criminal case against respondents 4 and 5 within the stipulated time. 2.According to the petitioner, the petitioner's marriage was solemnized on 11.09.2011 with one Saravana Babu. Even at the time of marriage and thereafter, the petitioner's husband, his parents, his sister the fourth respondent and his brother-in-law the fifth respondent have demanded dowry. Even though the...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-24-2016
S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this Writ Appeal is to an order made in W.P(MD)No.13613 of 2009, dated 24.02.2010 by which, the Writ Court, while setting aside the proceedings in R.P.No.11/06/D2, dated 10.11.2009 of the Commissioner, H.R.andC.E (Admin.), Department, Chennai, has permitted the writ petitioner therein, to participate in the adjudication process of O.A.No.21 of 2002. 2. Writ Appeal is filed with a delay of 935 days. Reasons assigned in paragraph Nos.8 and 9 are as follows:- 8. I submit that, from the inception I was entrusted with the responsibility of conducting proceedings before HR and CE department and this Honourable Court on behalf of other petitioners. During the pendency of the writ petition and subsequently, two of the original petitioners in O.A. No. 21 of 2002 who were arrayed as respondents 6 and 10 in W.P. No. 13613 of 2009 died. This and allowing of writ petition demoralized the other petitioners who were illiterate. I also fell ill around this time and wa...
A.I. Agnel Ilangovan Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-24-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P(MD)No.9688 of 2015 dated 22.06.2015) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal, is to an order, made in W.P(MD)No.9688 of 2015, dated 22.06.2015, by which, the Writ Court has declined to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.36267/O.Na.3/2014-1, dated 07.05.2015, of the Director of Local Fund Audit Department, Chennai, 2nd respondent herein. The Writ Court has declined to grant any direction to the respondents, to sanction pensionary benefits to the appellant, in the post of Assistant Inspector and Deputy Inspector, in Local Fund Audit Department, for the period from 05.10.2001 to 21.01.2013, along with arrears of pension and other terminal benefits. 2. Facts leading to the writ appeal, are that the appellant resigned from service on 21.01.2013 due to family circumstances. It was accepted by the Director of Local Fund Audit Department, Chennai, 2nd responden...
N. Nainar Thevar Vs. The Executive Officer, Kanyakumari District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-24-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the files of the respondent pertaining to its order bearing Na.Ka.No.12/2014/A2 dated 11.03.2016 and the subsequent proceedings of the respondent bearing Na.Ka.No.12/2014/A2 dated 14.03.2016 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to extend the lease period for the further period of three years commencing from 01.04.2016 by accepting 15% over and above the existing lease amount paid by the petitioner by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.02.2016 within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.) 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of rejection insofar as the extension sought for by the petitioner as lease period is expiring on 31.03.2016. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that the order is per se illegal as he stated that there are no arrears in respect o...
Tiruchendur Murugan (Education and Charitable) Trust, Rep.by its Chair ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent made in the notification bearing S.O.No.3518(E) dated 26.11.2013 issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent made in the notification bearing S.O.No.3518(E) dated 26.11.2013 issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Common Order: In view of the fact that the issue involved in both the writ petitions is one and the same, these writ petitions are taken up together and disposed of by a common order. 2. After some elaborate arguments made by both side...
P. Petchimuthu Vs. Karunakaran and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the complaint case of Petitioner in S.C.No.191 of 2009 from the file of the Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi to the file of Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli for trial.) 1. This petition has been filedto transfer the complaint case of Petitioner in S.C.No.191 of 2009 from the file of the Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi to the file of Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli for trial. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. On the complaint filed by the petitioner, a case in C.C.No.3 of 2007 is pending on the file of Human Rights (Principal District and Sessions Court, Tuticorin) against the respondents herein. While so, the petitioner gave a representation dated 08.10.2015 to the Hon'ble Chief Justice of this Court, making silly allegations against the Presiding Officer. The Registry of this Court issued a communication dated 03.11.2015 to...
V.S. Sridharan Vs. Baby Mehala
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal Order dated 24.2.2016 made in I.A. No.1260 of 2014 in O.S. No.714 of 2001 on the file of the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal Order dated 24.2.2016 passed in LA. No.1260 of 2014 in O,S, No.714 of 2001 by the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli . 2. The Petitioner is the Defendant/Judgment-debtor and the Respondent is the Plaintiff/Decree-holder in the Suit in OS No.714 of 2001. The Respondent filed a Suit for Specific Performance of an Agreement of Sale before the II Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruchirapalli. The Suit was decreed ex parte for non-filing of Written Statement on 6.8.2003. As per Decree, the Petitioner has to receive the balance Sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed. Three months time was granted. The Respondent deposited the ...
R. Thirumalairaj Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by The Secretary to ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 3rd respondent in connection with the orders passed by him , in his proceedings Ni.M.No.28582/02 (Adhi.8) dated 11.03.2006, quashing the same and consequently to direct the respondents to take note of the community of the petitioner's father, for deciding his community.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. The petitioner claims that he has been issued with a Community Certificate, by the Personal Assistant to the Collector (P.D.), Madurai, dated 28.02.1975, certifying that he belongs to "Kattunayakkan" Community, which is a Scheduled Tribe Community. On the strength of the above said certificate, he got appointment in Southern Railways. The Employer of the petitioner sent the Community Certificate of the petitioner to the District Level Vigilance Committee, Madurai District, to verify its genuineness. Upon enquiry, the District Le...
D. Murugaiah Vs. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
S. Manikumar, J. 1. A retired I.A. and A.S. Officer, has sought for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash R.O.C.No.C3/26037/15, dated 02.03.2016 and consequently, prayed for a direction to the District Collector, Kanyakumari District to demolish the construction made in Survey No.174/9, Kottaram West Village, Agasteeswaram Taluk, by respondents 3 to 5. He has also prayed for a direction to the District Collector and Superintendent of Police, respectively of Kanyakumari District, to remove the construction in Survey No.174/9, within a time frame. 2. According to the petitioner, he is native of Achankulam. Now, he is settled in Chennai and often, visit his native place, for his personal work. There is a temple called, ?Arulmighu Umayamman Temple? in Achankukalm. It is in Survey No.174/7. The village consists of Scheduled Caste Hindus, Nadars and Christians. There is a vacant place in Survey No.174/9, situated behind the said temple. East of that property, after the road, lies a CSI...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »