Chennai Madurai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sajith and Others Vs. State rep by the Inspector of Police, Kanyakumar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No.132 of 2014 on the file of the 1st respondent and to quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the case registered in Crime No.132 of 2014 on the file of the 1st respondent police, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.132 of 2014 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 427 and 506(i) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners/A1 to A3. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/A1 to A3 and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify of their respective part...
S. Chellamuthu and Another Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.15748/2012/A4 dated 24.06.2013 confirming the impugned order of the second respondent made in Si.Pa.4/2007/A1 dated 16.04.2012 and quash the same as illegal, consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore the patta in the name of the petitioners in respect of Survey No.264/1 at Ambigai Village, Oddanchathiram Taluk and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.15748/2012/A4 dated 24.06.2013 confirming the impugned order of the second respondent made in Si.Pa.4/2007/A1 dated 16.04.2012 and quash the same as illegal, consequently to...
Meenal Vs. Sedhu
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-18-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Decretal Order passed in I.A.No.3 of 2016 in I.A.No.741 of 2015 in un-numbered H.M.O.P.No of 2015, dated 29.01.2016 on the file of the Learned Family Judge, Madurai and consequently direct the Learned Family Judge, Madurai to waiving off the statutory period of 6 months and to dispose of the main H.M.O.P. Petition within stipulated time framed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. This Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order of dismissal, dated 29.01.2016 in I.A.No.3 of 2016 in I.A.No.741 of 2015 filed by the Revision Petitioner, under Section 13(B2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking leave to file the divorce petition within the period of one year. 2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 20.08.2015. Difference of opinion have arisen between them and therefore, it became impossible for them to live as husband and wif...
Ramachandran Vs. S. Dhanasekaran
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-18-2016
(Prayer: CRP.No.916 of 2009: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 6(B) of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act T.N.Act 25 of 1955 as amended against the order of Revenue Court, Thanjavur dated 23.04.2008 made in P.No.28 of 2004 (Kumbakonam Camp) and prays for Reversal of the order. ) 1. The Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the order of Revenue Court, Thanjavur dated 23.04.2008 made in P.Nos.28,25,26,27,32,30 and 31 of 2004 (Kumbakonam Camp) and dated 11.11.2008 made in P.No.35 of 2007 (Papanasam Camp) respectively and prays for Reversal of the order. 3. In all these Civil Revision Petitions issue is one and the same. Therefore, all the Civil Revision Petitions are heard together and disposed of by this common order. 4. The petitioners in all the Civil Revision Petitions are tenants in the property in question. According to the respondent, he is owner of the property. The petitioners failed to pay rent for the Fasli 1408 to 1412 in CRP. Nos.916 to 92...
K. Gopinath Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endow ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-18-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents herein to remove the shops around the Palani Temple Hills Girivala pathai where persons belonging to Islam and other religion are running shops in which they are eating beef and insulting the religious faith of the devotees and creating disharmony by considering the petitioner's written representation dated 12.03.2016 within a time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Claiming himself to be a practising lawyer, under the garb of President, Hindu Munnetra Kazhagam, Mr.K.Gopinath, party in person, is before us, seeking for a writ of mandamus, directing Respondents to remove the shops in and around Palani Temple Hills Girivala pathai, run by persons belonging to Islam and other religion where they are eating beef, insulting the religious faith of the devotees and creating disharmony, by considering his representation dated 12.03....
D. Thangaraj and Others Vs. G. Kalpana and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-18-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated, 09.12.2015 made in I.A.Nos.202 to 204 of 2013 in O.S.No.78 of 2006, on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Valliyoor / Additional District Munsif, Valliyoor(FAC).) Common Order 1. The Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the fair and decreetal order, dated 09.12.2015 made in I.A.Nos.202 to 204 of 2013 in O.S.No.78 of 2006, on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Valliyoor / Additional District Munsif, Valliyoor(FAC). 2. The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.78 of 2006. They filed a suit for partition and separate possession of the plaintiffs 2/3 share in the schedule property, against the second respondent. The second respondent herein filed written statement. At the time of trial they did not appear. Therefore, ex parte preliminary decree was passed on 19.10.2009. Subsequently, the final decre...
Father of the Constitution of India Foundation, represented by its Man ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-18-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue Community Certificate to the persons, who embraced Buddhism by mentioning their religion name alone as Nav Buddha, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.03.2015 within the time stipulated by this Court.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Managing Trustee of the Father of the Constitution of India Foundation and a practicing lawyer has sought for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue Community Certificates to persons, who have embraced Buddhism, by mentioning their religion name alone, as Nav Buddha, based on the representation of the petitioner, dated 03.03.2015, within a time frame. 2. Supporting the prayer sought for, the petitioner has relied on an order passed by the Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, No.3, Pune, dated 29.01.2012, wherein the community of one Chaudhari Bharat has been mentioned as Sch...
M/s. Ragavi Poultry Farm, Rep by its Managing Partner S. Arumugam Vs. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-17-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the order passed by the 1st respondent Tribunal dated 11.02.2016 in I.A.No.321 of 2016 in S.A.No.54 of 2016 in so far as the conditional order to pay Rs.40 lakhs in two installments and quash the same.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this writ petition, is to an order, made in I.A.No.321 of 2016 in S.A.No.54 of 2016, dated 11.02.2016, on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, by which, the Tribunal has granted stay of confirmation of the sale fixed on 12.02.2016, subject to the condition that the writ petitioner has to make payment of Rs.20,00,000/- to the 2nd respondent/Bank, directly on or before 11.03.2016, as first installment and another payment of Rs.20,00,000/- as the second installment on or before 11.04.2016. 2. Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, has also made it clear that in the event of failure to make single payment, ad-interi...
Ubaharameri Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-17-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere in the civil dispute till the disposal of the O.S.No. 43 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif Court Thiruppathur.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere in the civil dispute till the disposal of the O.S.No. 43 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif Court Thiruppathur. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by one Adaikalam, petition enquiry is pending. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the...
M/s. Lingam and Co., Vs. M.M.S. Dawood and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-17-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 20.01.2016, passed in I.A.No.62 of 2015 in Unregistered Rent Control Appeal, by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 20.01.2016, passed in I.A.No.62 of 2015 in Unregistered Rent Control Appeal, by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli. 2. The petitioner/tenant is the respondent in R.C.O.P.No.40 of 2014. The respondents herein have filed the said R.C.O.P., for eviction of the petitioner on the ground of willful default and owners' occupation. They also filed I.A.No.40 of 2015 under Section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 [hereinafter referred to as the Act ], seeking a direction to the petitioner to pay or deposit the rent of Rs.11,60,775/- and a further directi...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »