S. Chellamuthu and Another Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District and Others

S. Chellamuthu and Another vs The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 21, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191935

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191935
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: B. Rajendran
Decided On: Mar 21, 2016
Case Number: W.P(MD)No. 12614 of 2013 & M.P(MD)Nos. 2 & 3 of 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Chellamuthu and Another

Respondent

The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District and Others

Excerpt

(prayer:writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent in his proceedings in na.ka.no.15748/2012/a4 dated 24.06.2013 confirming the impugned order of the second respondent made in si.pa.4/2007/a1 dated 16.04.2012 and quash the same as illegal, consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore the patta in the name of the petitioners in respect of survey no.264/1 at ambigai village, oddanchathiram taluk and pass further orders as this court may deem fit and proper.) the prayer in the writ petition is for a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent in his proceedings in na.ka.no.15748/2012/a4 dated 24.06.2013 confirming the impugned order of the second respondent made in si.pa.4/2007/a1 dated 16.04.2012 and quash the same as illegal, consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore the patta in the name of the petitioners in respect of survey no.264/1 at ambigai village, oddanchathiram taluk. 2. the impugned order is only a confirmation of the order of the revenue divisional officer for grant of patta. both sides brought to the notice of this court that there are two civil suits pending in respect of the title. the question of challenging the order of the district revenue officer does not arise at that time. the parties can adjudicate the matter. so, this court cannot go into the merits of the same. the civil court will independently try and dispose of the same in accordance with law. 3. with the above observations, this writ petition is dismissed. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.15748/2012/A4 dated 24.06.2013 confirming the impugned order of the second respondent made in Si.Pa.4/2007/A1 dated 16.04.2012 and quash the same as illegal, consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore the patta in the name of the petitioners in respect of Survey No.264/1 at Ambigai Village, Oddanchathiram Taluk and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.)

The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.15748/2012/A4 dated 24.06.2013 confirming the impugned order of the second respondent made in Si.Pa.4/2007/A1 dated 16.04.2012 and quash the same as illegal, consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore the patta in the name of the petitioners in respect of Survey No.264/1 at Ambigai Village, Oddanchathiram Taluk.

2. The impugned order is only a confirmation of the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer for grant of patta. Both sides brought to the notice of this Court that there are two civil suits pending in respect of the title. The question of challenging the order of the District Revenue Officer does not arise at that time. The parties can adjudicate the matter. So, this Court cannot go into the merits of the same. The civil Court will independently try and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

3. With the above observations, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties S. Chellamuthu and Another vs The District Revenue Officer, D... Same Subject Education Same Judge B. Rajendran