Chennai Madurai Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
I. John Vs. T. Rajasekaran, Regiional Transport Officer, Tirunelveli D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
1. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent/Contemnor submitted that the order passed in the above Writ Petition has been complied with by forwarding a proposal to the Accountant General, Accountant General Office, 361, Anna Salai, Chennai-18. He has also produced a copy of the same before this Court. 2. Recording the above said submission, the Contempt Petition is closed....
J. Karthikeyan Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary, Heal ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus forbearing the 5th Respondent, his Officers and his Subordinates or any one acting through them or under them from in any manner interfering with (the petitioner) his legal right to carry on his business continuously and on his representation dated 30.11.2016.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus forbearing the 5th respondent from in any manner interfering with the petitioner's legal right to carry on his business. 2. The petitioner is running a business in the name of Sri Vetrivelmurugan, selling small salt packets. The grievance of the petitioner is that the fifth respondent has unlawfully interfered with his business and seized the some salt packets also by sealing the premises without following rules on 29.11.2016. 3. A counter affidavit is filed by the fifth respondent, wherein, it is contended that the petitioner manufactured salt packets by using forged licen...
Allavuthen Vs. The Additional Directors, Town Panchayat of Ramanathapu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.299 of 2008, dated 27.02.2012 regarding Shop.No.21 and 22 and the impugned notification issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.299 of 2008, dated 18.2.2013 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the second respondent to confirm the auction in favour of the Petitioner regarding the Shop No.21 and 22.) 1. When the matter was called on 5.12.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal''. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. 2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. No costs....
New India Assurance Company Limited, Namakkal Vs. Sakthivel and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.18 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Additional District Court, Fast Track Court No.2, Trichirappalli, dated 10.06.2004.) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant-Insurance Company against the award of Rs.7,95,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs and Ninety Five Thousand only) for the injury sustained by the first respondent/claimant in the accident occurred on 04.08.2000. 2. The first respondent/claimant sustained various injuries including fracture of both the hip bones and because of that, the movement of the hip has been restricted by 50 degree of right side and 60 degree of left side. He sustained injuries in the abdomen resulting in injury to the urinary track, for which, the first respondent/claimant underwent a surgery. Thirdly, to an extent 6 cm X 2 cm, his bones got crushed and as a result of the injury to th...
D. Balan Vs. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records culminating in the impugned order dated 10.05.2013 in proceedings Pa. Mu. No.32660/P1/2012 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal void abinitio without jurisdiction ultravires and direct the 3rd respondent to register the release deed No.133/2008 in Book in 1 by collecting the deficit stamp duty of Rs. 72 000/-) 1. The brief facts of the petitioner's case is as follows:- The properties comprised in T.S.Nos.73/4 and 73/1A, Natham Road, Dindigul were originally vested with M/s.I.Bahrudeen, I.Rafeeq and I.Abdul Salam. The aforesaid three persons constituted a partnership firm under the name and style of Shan Theatre through a partnership deed dated 07.03.1988. Subsequently, the petitioner and eight others were inducted into the said partnership firm as partners through a partnership deed dated 27.03.2003. As per the re...
V. Ramar and Others Vs. D. Sabitha, State of Tamil Nadu, Represented b ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Article 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court to punish the respondents for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.16771 of 2013, dated 09.04.2014 for committing the act of Contempt of Court.) 1. It is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that as against the order passed in the above Writ Petition, the respondents filed W.A.No.676 of 2015 and the same was admitted and pending. 2. Recording the above said submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. However, liberty is given to the Petitioner to revive the Contempt Petition, if situation so warrants, in future....
Selvaraj and Another Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer in W.P(MD)No.23977 of 2016: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pursuant to the impugned order of the 4th respondent 13.10.2016 in his proceedings bearing A.Thi.Mu.No.192/2016 and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents herein to register sale deed executed for the petitioner dated 07.09.2016 in respect of land in S.No.517/3 Panchalagkurichi Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District. in W.P(MD)No.23978 of 2016: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pursuant to the impugned order of the 4th respondent 13.10.2016 in his proceedings bearing A.Thi.Mu.No.191/2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to register sale deed executed for the petitioner dated 07.09.2016 in respect of land in S.No.517/2 Panchalagkurichi Vil...
D. Sathiyavani Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukottai and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to release the vehicle bearing registration No.TN. 58 Q 0135 seized by the respondents herein on 15.11.2016 to the petitioner.) 1. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the abovesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs....
Subramanian and Another Vs. K. Mohan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.17 of 2004 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil, dated 14.02.2007 confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.350 of 2000 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil, dated 07.10.2003.) 1. The plaintiffs 2 and 4 in the suit in O.S.No.350 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil, are the appellants in this Second Appeal. 2. The suit was originally filed by the plaintiffs 1 and 2. However, during pendency of the suit, the first plaintiff died. The second plaintiff is also the son of first plaintiff. However, the plaintiffs 3 and 4 were also impleaded as the other legal representatives of the first plaintiff. The suit is for declaration that the suit third schedule belong to the plaintiffs 2 to 4 exclusively and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching into the suit third s...
S. Krishnaveni Vs. Inspector General of Registration, Chennai and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 16.8.2016 relating with the properties S.No.1470 1471 and 1472/1 in Seevalaperi Village in Palayamkottai Taluk in Tirunelveli District in the light of the circular dt.15.09.2010 issued by the 1st respondent.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »