V. Ramar and Others Vs. D. Sabitha, State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, School Education Department, Chennai and Others

V. Ramar and Others vs D. Sabitha, State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, School Education Department, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Dec 19, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186361

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1186361
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: K. Ravichandrabaabu
Decided On: Dec 19, 2016
Case Number: CONT P (MD) Nos. 1319 to 1326 of 2014 in W.P. (MD) Nos. 16771 to 16775, 16880, 17859 & 17860 of 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V. Ramar and Others

Respondent

D. Sabitha, State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, School Education Department, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: contempt petition filed under article 11 of contempt of courts act, praying this court to punish the respondents for non-compliance of the order passed by this court in w.p.no.16771 of 2013, dated 09.04.2014 for committing the act of contempt of court.) 1. it is represented by the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondents that as against the order passed in the above writ petition, the respondents filed w.a.no.676 of 2015 and the same was admitted and pending. 2. recording the above said submission, this contempt petition is closed. however, liberty is given to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition, if situation so warrants, in future.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Article 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court to punish the respondents for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.16771 of 2013, dated 09.04.2014 for committing the act of Contempt of Court.)

1. It is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that as against the order passed in the above Writ Petition, the respondents filed W.A.No.676 of 2015 and the same was admitted and pending.

2. Recording the above said submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. However, liberty is given to the Petitioner to revive the Contempt Petition, if situation so warrants, in future.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties V. Ramar and Others vs D. Sabitha, State of Tamil Nadu, Repre... Same Subject Education Same Judge K. Ravichandrabaabu