Chennai Madurai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Muthu Vs. The Inspector of Police, Samayapuram Police Station, Trichy
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 15.10.2014 made in S.C.No.85 of 2014, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Trichirappalli.) S. Nagamuthu, J The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.85 of 2014, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Trichirappalli. He stood charged for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. By Judgment dated 15.10.2014, the Trial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him, as detailed below:- Section of LawSentence of imprisonmentFine amount302 IPCTo undergo imprisonment for life.Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.294(b) IPC Rs.500/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for fifteen days. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up with this Criminal Appeal. 2.The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- The deceased, in this case, was...
Rajendran and Another Vs. V. Thirugnanasambandamoorthy
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.71 of 2008, on the file of the III Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli.) 1. The learned counsel for the respondent made an endorsement that the respondent/plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit in O.S.No.71 of 2008, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruchirappalli, with liberty to file a fresh suit with the same cause of action and has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the Civil Revision Petition filed by the revision petitioner is closed. Liberty is granted as sought for. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. No costs....
The Commissioner of Customs Vs. M/s.MKS Shipping Agencies Pvt.Ltd
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 04.01.2013 made in W.P.(MD).No.16351of 2012.) M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. The respondent / Revenue in W.P.(MD).No.16351 of 2012 is the appellant herein and aggrieved by the final order, dated 04.01.2013, in and by which, challenge made to the show cause notice, dated 06.12.2012, issued by the appellant herein, has been quashed by the learned Judge and hence, came forward to file this Writ Appeal. 2. A perusal of the materials placed before this Court would disclose among other things that the respondent /writ petitioner carries the business of Custom House Agents (in short 'CHA') and to carry out this agency work, he obtained license in the year 2004 under Section 146 of the Customs Act 1962 and CHALR 2004 Regulations. The nature of the activities carried on by the said Concern is relating to entry or departure of a conveyance or the import or export of goods in the Customs House Station and their rol...
S. Vijayalakshmi and Others Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu rep. through ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling the records relating to the Impugned Order of the 2nd Respondent made in Na.Ka.No.12535/A2/2011 dated 25.05.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to regularize the Petitioners from the year 2002 with all attendant benefits.) 1. The writ petitioners were appointed as Village Librarian on consolidated pay. In G.O.Ms.No.66, dated 30.01.1996, it was clarified that the vacancy of Grade -III Librarian could be filled up from the qualified Village Librarian, like the petitioners herein. But contrary to the undertaking, the Government attempted to fill up the post of Grade - III Librarian from open market. This appointments were challenged before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal by various original applications. By Judgments dated 07.06.2000, 23.06.2000 and 27.11.2000, have directed to fill up the vacancies of Grade - III Librarian from ...
Ravindran Vs. Padma and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside Clause No.2 in the returned order in petition and order dated 9.9.2016 in unnumbered O.S.SR.No.156 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Sub-Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and to direct the Principal Sub-Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District to number the main suit in O.S.SR.No.156 of 2016 and to decide the same on merits and in accordance with law.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking for a direction to set aside Clause No.2 in the returned order in petition and order, dated 09.09.2016 in unnumbered O.S.SR.No.156 of 2016, on the file of the Principal Sub-Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and to direct the Principal Sub-Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District to number the main suit in O.S.SR.No.156 of 2016 and to decide the same on merits and in accordance with law. 2. According to the Petitioner, the trial Court ought to have number the suit in O.S.SR...
Vijayarani Vs. V. Chandrakumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in HMOP.No.2792 of 2015 on the file of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai to the III Additional Sub-Court, Madurai.) 1. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 22.02.2013 as per the Hindu rites and customs. Since the petitioner could not procreate a child, the respondent started harassing her and driven out her from the matrimonial house. The petitioner further states that now she is residing her parent's house at Madurai and she is unemployed. She is living with the support of her parents and not in a position to spend for conducting the case at Chennai. 2. This apart, the petitioner filed a maintenance case in M.C.No.19 of 2015 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai, which is pending. The respondent appeared in this matter and it is posted for adducing evidence. Further, the petitioner filed HMOP No.290 of 2015 for restitution of conjugal rights, whic...
Sumathi Vs. Kathiravan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.408 of 2015 on the file of the I-Additional Sub Court, Madurai District at Melur Camp Court and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Dindigul.) 1. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 20.10.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is also closed....
Ramya Prasanna Vs. V. Prasanna
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer the HMOP.No.2253 of 2015 on the file of the Family Court, Chennai to the file of the Family Court at Trichy.) 1. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 02.02.2009 as per the Hindu rites and customs. Due to the quarrel between the petitioner and the respondent, they have separated by leaving the matrimonial home. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that due to the strained relationship with the respondent, she was forced to leave the matrimonial home and now she is living at Trichy along with her parents. 3. The petitioner further contended that she is unemployed and not having any independent sources of income and she is living with the support of her parents and not in a position to spend money for conducting the case at Chennai. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the petition by stating that the contentions of the petitioner are false and ...
S.M.K. Abdul Mathaleep Vs. Beer Mohammed Masthan Sabele Dharaha Kanthu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the Trust O.P.No.160 of 2009 from the file of District court, Dindigul and to transfer to the file of Principal Sub Court, Dindigul and to try along with Wakf O.P.No.2 of 2015 pending before the said Court and deliver a common order.) 1. The present petition is filed seeking to transfer the Trust O.P.No.160 of 2009 pending before the District court, Dindigul, to the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul, to try along with Wakf O.P.No.2 of 2015 pending before the sane Court. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that he is resident of Natham Town and the respondents 1 and 2 filed Trust O.P.No.160 of 2009 before the District court, Dindigul, seeking permission to alienate the schedule properties said in O.P., as it belongs to a private trust created by the respondents' forefathers and deposit the sale consideration in a Nationalised Bank and to utilize the interest amount for charitable purpose mentioned in the tr...
M. Mariyappan Vs. K. Chandradevi (Died) and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer:Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the decree and Judgement of the Principal District Judge, Trichy, in A.S.No.183 of 2010 dated 12.03.2012 affirming the decree and judgment of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Trichy, in O.S.No.193 of 2010 dated 14.07.2010 and consequently dismiss the suit. Prayer:Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the decree and Judgement of the Principal District Judge, Trichy, in A.S.No.184 of 2010 dated 12.03.2012 affirming the decree and judgment of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Trichy, in O.S.No.206 of 2003 dated 14.07.2010 and consequently dismiss the suit.) Common Judgment: The plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.706 of 2003 (Originally O.S.No.2904 of 1989) on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Trichy and the first defendant in the suit in O.S.No.193 of 2000, is the appellant in the above second appeals. 2. The case of the plaintiff in O.S.No.706 of 2003 is ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »