Sumathi Vs. Kathiravan

Sumathi vs Kathiravan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 21, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187701

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1187701
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: S.M. Subramaniam
Decided On: Oct 21, 2016
Case Number: TR.C.M.P (MD) No. 401 of 2016 & C.M.P (MD) No. 7789 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sumathi

Respondent

Kathiravan

Excerpt

(prayer: petition filed under section 24 of civil procedure code to withdraw h.m.o.p.no.408 of 2015 on the file of the i-additional sub court, madurai district at melur camp court and transfer the same to the sub court, dindigul.) 1. when the matter was taken up for hearing on 20.10.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. hence, this transfer civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.408 of 2015 on the file of the I-Additional Sub Court, Madurai District at Melur Camp Court and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Dindigul.)

1. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 20.10.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Sumathi vs Kathiravan Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge S.M. Subramaniam