Chennai Madurai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Gopalan Vs. The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Ref.No.513/SC/2013 dated 13.11.2013 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all attendant benefits.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 13.11.2013 passed in Ref.No.513/SC/2013 as illegal, by which the petitioner was placed under deemed suspension with effect from the date of detention, i.e., 27.09.2013. The petitioner also sought direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all attendant benefits. 2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is that on 09.03.2014, the ...
J. Sangili Vs. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Grea ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue a No Objection Certificate to the petitioner for joining in the combined Engineering Services in view of selection in the examination conducted by the first respondent and to consequently direct the first respondent to recommend the appointment of the petitioner as an Assistant Engineer in the combined Engineering Services within the time that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue a No Objection Certificate to the petitioner for joining in the combined Engineering Services, in view of selection in the examination conducted by the first respondent and consequently to direct the first respondent to recommend the appointment of the petitioner as an Assistant Engineer in the combined Engineering Services within the time that may be stipulated by this Court. 2. He...
Mohan Dass Vs. The General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigham Ltd. Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondentsto restore the petitioner in Shop No.65, Thalavai Agraharam Street, North Avani Moola Veethi, Madurai pending disposal of the above writ petition. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to restore the petitioner in Shop No.65, Thalavai Agraharam Street, North Avani Moola Veethi, Madurai pending disposal of the above writ petition. 2. It is seen that the petitioner running a Public Telephone Booth at No.65, Thalavai Agraharam Street, North Avani Moola Veethi, Madurai. Originally the said shop was allotted to Dhana Pandian by the first respondent. The said Dhana Pandian adopted the petitioner as his son. Thereafter, the said Dhana Pandian passed away. After his death, the petitioner is continuing the Telephone Booth business in the above place. While so, the 3rd and 4th respondents with a help of the second respondent subordin...
Irudhayaraj Vs. Durairaj
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.1068 of 2014 in O.S.No.35 of 2009, dated 1.8.2015, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchendur.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.1068 of 2014 in O.S.No.35 of 2009, dated 1.8.2015, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchendur. 2. According to the Petitioner, the petitioner herein filed a suit in O.S.No.35 of 2009 before the District Munsif Court, Thiruchendur for declaration to declare the suit second schedule property belongs to the Petitioner and for recovery of possession. The suit schedule properties consist of two schedules comprised in S.No.256/1A/2. The first schedule is measuring about 12 cents and the second schedule is the part of the first schedule measuring three cents situated on the western side of the first property. In the aforesa...
P. Uma Vs. The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 3 and 4 herein to sponsor the name of the petitioner under the SCA(ICM-Priority Category) for the post of Graduate Assistant (Zoology) and consequently directing theRespondents 1 and 2 herein to appoint the petitioner as Graduate Assistant (Zoology) under the SCA (ICM-Priority) Category among the existing 294 vacancies now available with the 2nd respondent department as per the petitioner's seniority vide Employment Registration No. W/3202/03/96 dated 28/10/2003.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 3 and 4 herein to sponsor the name of the petitioner under the SCA(ICM-Priority Category) for the post of Graduate Assistant (Zoology) and consequently directing the Respondents 1 and 2 herein to appoint the petitioner as Graduate Assistant (Zoology) under the SCA (ICM-Priority) Category amo...
Sahayadhas Vs. The Secretary, Public Work Department, Secretariat, For ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to grant Rs.20,94,503/- to the petitioner for the construction work done by the petitioner, on the basis of representation dated 12.03.2012. Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to grant Rs.7,46,266/- to the petitioner for the construction work done by the petitioner, on the basis of representation dated 12.03.2012.) Common Order 1. In both the writ petitions, the petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondent department to grant Rs.20,94,503/- and Rs.7,46,266/- respectively to the petitioner for the construction work done by him, on the basis of his representations dated 12.03.2012. 2. Heard Mr.F.Deepak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Aairam K.Selvakumar, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of th...
The Rameswaram Vattara Kalanjiam rep. by its President, Vs. The State ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to conduct enquiry on the basis of the representation, dated 30.1.2012, preferred by the petitioner on behalf of the Society, consequently to take necessary action against the respondents those, who have illegally occupied the office of the Rameswaram Vattara Kalanjiam situate at No.12/42, Vannan Street, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District and handover thesame to petitioner for better administration within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry on the basis of the representation, dated 30.1.2012, preferred by the petitioner on behalf of the Society and consequently to take necessary action against the respondents those, who have illegally occupied the office of the Rameswaram Vattara Kalanjiam situate at No.12/42, Vannan Street, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District and hand...
M. Murugan Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary Finance Depar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose the petitioner's appeal petition, dated 10.08.2012, within the time frame as fixed by this Honourable Court and further directing the 1st respondent to secure teh amount of Rs.1,47,280/- (One lakhs forty seven thousand two hundred and eighty only) from the 3rd respondent for making the payment to the petitioner for taking the treatment at the 4th respondent hospital with the other incidental expenses.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal petition, dated 10.08.2012, within the time frame as fixed by this Court and further directing the 1st respondent to secure the amount of Rs.1,47,280/- (One lakhs fourty seven thousand two hundred and eighty only) from the 3rd respondent for making the payment to the petitioner for taking the tr...
A. Ananthi Vs. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to approve the appointment of the petitioner dated 01.3.2007 as B.T Assistant in the fifth respondent / Concordia Higher Secondary School, Valliyoor with in a time stipulated by this Court.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to approve her appointment, dated 01.3.2007 as B.T Assistant in the fifth respondent / Concordia Higher Secondary School, Valliyoor with in a time stipulated by this Court. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided in the case of S.Christy vs. The Chief Educational Officer reported in 2011(5) CTC 532. 3. In view of the above, the 3 rd respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petition...
S. Visalakshi Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Sec ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order passed by the Hon'ble Court in W.P.(MD) No.12849 of 2013 dated 01.08.2013 and allow the above writ petition.) S.S. Sundar, J. 1. The unsuccessful petitioner in the writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.12849 of 2013 is the appellant in the above writ appeal. 2. The case of the writ petitioner / appellant is that she is a grand-daughter of Late Subramania Pillai, who was a freedom fighter. Though the Government of Tamil Nadu has enumerated various schemes to give benefit to the freedom fighters and their legal heirs, by providing reservations for the descendants of the freedom fighters for certain Government posts, such a reservation was not provided when the second respondent issued a notification for the recruitment of Assistant Professors in Tamil Nadu Collegiate Educational Service for appointment in Government Arts and Science Colleges. The notification is for filling up of 1093 vacancies in various subjec...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »