Chennai Madurai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Josephine Martin and Another Vs. David Ravirajan, The Inspector of Pol ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer:Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish those concerned with the respondent for willfully and wantonly disobeying the Hon'ble Court order in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21978 of 2014 dated 16.12.2014.) 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submits that the Case has been numbered as C.C.No.3 of 2015 on the file of the Land Grabbing Court, Tirunelveli. Hence, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the contempt petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
K. Ganesamoorthi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai Distric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the learned Juvenile Board to consider the bail application on the surrender of the petitioner in connection with Crime No.187 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent police on merits on the same day.) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to the learned Juvenile Board to consider the bail application on the surrender of the petitioner in connection with Crime No.187 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent police on merits on the same day. 2. The petitioner is accused for offences punishable under Section 306 IPC. 3. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side. The materials available on record were also perused. 4. Considering the nature of offences alleged against the petitioner, this Court considers it appropriate to direct the Juvenile Justice Board, Pudukkottai, to consider the bail application of the petitioner on merits and pass appropriate order on the s...
M. Palswamy and Others Vs. The Regional Transport Authority, Nagercoil ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayers: Writ Petition (MD) No.19525 of 2015:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to permit the petitioner's Mini Bus inside the Anna Bus Stand in bearing Registration No. TN 74 E 7197 as per the Transport Commissioner's circular letter in R.No.90919/E2/2000 dated 29.11.2000 while ply on the route Chettikulam Junction to A.N. Kudy forthwith. Writ Petition(MD)No.19526 of 2015:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to permit the petitioner's Mini Bus inside the Anna Bus Stand in bearing Registration No. TN 74 E 7798 as per the Transport Commissioner's circular letter in R.No.90919/E2/2000 dated 29.11.2000 while ply on the route SMRV School to Erachakulam Ammancoil forthwith. Writ Petition(MD)No.19527 of 2015:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus direct...
Mookan @ Murugan @ Bhaskar Vs. State rep. by its The Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. praying this Court, to call for the records relating to the Judgment delivered in S.C.No.36 of 2011 dated 28.04.2011 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Thoothukudi and to set aside the said Judgment and conviction.) V.S. Ravi, J. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.36 of 2011(Crime No.351 of 2009), on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Thoothukudi. He has been charged for the offences under Sections 341 and 302 I.P.C. The trial Court, by Judgment dated 28.04.2011, acquitted him under Section 341 I.P.C, but convicted him under Section 302 I.P.C., and sentenced him to undergo Life Imprisonment and also imposed a fine of Rs.2,000/- and, in default, to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said Judgment passed in S.C.No.36 of 2011, the appellant/accused in Crime No.351 of 2009, is before this Court with this present app...
G. Sakthivel and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in C.No.110/Mike/B2PS/2015 dated 25.10.2015 of the second respondent and to quash the same, consequently directing the 2nd respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural programme (i.e.,) Adal Padal on 4.11.2015 at 6.30 pm in the eve of Arulmighu Sri Kaliamman Kovil, 39th Years Thiruvizha at Allinagaram, Theni Taluk, Theni District.) 1. Mr.D.Muruganandam learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the Respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to ...
D. Honest Raj Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to accord necessary permission and give police protection to conduct the Kabadi tournament at Peruvalappur village, Lalgudi taluk, Trichy District on 31.10.2015 and 1.11.2015 respectively on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.10.2015.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to accord necessary permission and give police protection to conduct the Kabadi tournament at Peruvalappur village, Lalgudi taluk, Trichy District on 31.10.2015 and 1.11.2015 respectively on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.10.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers joint...
D. Manikandan Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent to grant permission for organizing a small function on 30.10.2015 at Uralvoimozhi Village, Radhapuram Village, Tirunelveli District for distributing Note books, pencil, pen and uniform to the school going children belonging to the all community and also allow the village people to conduct an orchestra in the evening between 6.00 pm to 10.00 pm.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents particularly the second respondent to grant permission for organizing a small function on 30.10.2015 at Uralvoimozhi Village, Radhapuram Village, Tirunelveli District for distributing Note books, pencil, pen and uniform to the school going children belonging to all community and also allow the village people to conduct an orchestra in the evening between ...
M. Otchathevar Vs. The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madura ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ ofMandamus directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the appeal preferred by the petitioner dated 01.04.2015 to set aside the punishment order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 06.03.2015.) 1. The petitioner, who suffered the punishment of compulsory retirement, by order dated 06.03.2015, at the hands of the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, the 3rd respondent herein, has filed an appeal before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai, the second respondent herein, on 01.04.2015. Finding no response in the status of the appeal, the petitioner has come before this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the appeal preferred by him dated 01.04.2015 to set aside the punishment order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 06.03.2015. 2. Mrs.S.Bharathi, learned Government Advocate ...
K. Sekar Vs. The Director of School Education, D.P.I. Campus, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.5377/C3/E2/2015 dated 17.04.2015 and quash the same as illegal and direct the 2nd respondent to include the petitioner's name in the seniority No.38 in the tentative promotional list of the secondary grade teachers B.T. Assistant (English) as on 01.01.2015.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/K.Sekar challenging the impugned order passed by the second respondent, the Joint Director of School Education (Personal), Chennai, dated 17.04.2015 in Na.Ka.No.5377/C3/E2/2015, in and by which, the request of the petitioner to include his name for further promotion to the post of B.T. Assistant, was refused citing a reason that the petitioner has obtained two degrees, namely, B.A. (Economise) and B.Ed., simultaneously, namely from 2011-2014 (B.A., (Economise) and B.Ed on 03.04.2014 (one year). 2. Learne...
R. Selvalakshmi Vs. Vijayandira Bidari, The Superintendent of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer:Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the 1st respondent/Contemnor for his willful disobedience of the order passed by the Hon'ble Court dated 20.3.2015 in Crl.O.P(MD) No.22701 of 2014.) 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the contempt petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »