Chennai Madurai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Sethupathy Pandian and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his Na.Ka.No. /SDO-OMK/2015 dated 25.10.2015, quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to give permission to the petitioner to use amplifiers and mike set for celebration of National Leader Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Thevar's 108th Birthday Anniversary (Guru Pooja) from 6.00 pm to 10.00 pm on 29.10.2015 and from 6.00 am to 6.00 pm on 30.10.2015 in Kallambal village, Panaiyur Post, Madurai District.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement, made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
K. Maharajan Vs. Sankarammal
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to set aside the order passed by the learned Family Judge, Tirunelveli dated 12.02.2015 in M.C.No.54 of 2014.) 1. It is represented by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that the matter has been settled and the parties are living together and therefore, the Revision petition may be dismissed as not pressed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the above, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed (on account of the settlement between the parties). Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed....
Komalandi and Others Vs. Kadarkarai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.32 of 2007 in A.S.No.6 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Sankarankoil dated 25.9.2007.) The Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in I.A.No.32 of 2007 in A.S.No.6 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Sankarankovil dated 25.9.2007. 2. The said I.A.No.32 of 2007 has been filed to stay the operation of the Decree till the disposal of the Appeal. However, by letter dated 20.10.2015 in D.No.2150/2015, the learned Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil has clearly stated that the Appeal Suit No.6 of 2007 has already been disposed of by the said Court by Judgment dated 23.7.2013. Hence the learned counsel for the petitioners has reported that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. 3. In such circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected M.P(MD) N...
Kannadhasan and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct therespondents not to harass the petitioner except under due process of law.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C seeking a direction to therespondents not to harass the petitioner except under due process of law. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instruction submitted that there is no case and no F.I.R pending against the petitioner and hence, there is no harassment by the respondent police. 3. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the second respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioner. Thereupon, the petitioner shal...
M/s. First Garment MFG Co.(India) Pvt.Ltd. Vs. The Assistant Commissio ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in TIN No.33476231113/2008-08 dated 15.12.2008 pertaining to February 2008, quash the same as illegal and contrary to Article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondent to refund the taxes paid on exports to the tune of Rs.16,572/-.) Common Order 1. Since the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions are one and the same, they are all taken up together and disposed of, by a common order. 2. For the sake of convenience, W.P.(MD).No.1395 of 2010 is taken into consideration:- 3. The Writ Petition in W.P.(MD).No.1395 of 2010 has been filed praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in TIN No.33476231113/2008-08 dated 15.12.2008 pertaining to February 2008, quash the same as illegal and contrary to Article 286(1)(b) of ...
P. Radhakrishnan Vs. L.R. Ramesh
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Fast Track Court Magisterial Level, Madurai in Cr.M.P.No.383 of 2013 in STC No.1068 of 2012 and set aside the order dated 13.02.2013.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also given a letter to that effect. 2. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
Pandi Vs. The Inspector of Police, Andipatti Police Station, Theni
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by one Muthiah, petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.No.728 of 2015. He further submits that the respondent has not harassed the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but le...
S. Thirumani and Another Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, The Director of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Appeals filed under under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 10.07.2015, made in W.P.(MD)Nos.4742 and 4740 of 2015.) Common Judgment V.M. Velumani, J., 1. These writ appeals have been filed challenging the order dated 10.07.2015, made in W.P.(MD)Nos.4742 and 4740 of 2015. 2. Since common issues are involved in both the writ appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The case of the appellants: (i) The appellants and two other students, viz., N.Sivaguru and M.Palanisamy, were studying III year in five years B.A., B.L., Degree course at Government Law College, Trichy. They were extending their support to the students, whenever they went on protest for the interest of students as well as for the interest of the Society and participated in those protest. (ii) Girl students in the ladies hostel were checked-up and searched to find out whether any student is having mobile phone in the hostel. Mrs.Krishna Leela, Assistant Profess...
K. Gopalsamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members without due procedure of law.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members without due procedure of law. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that no petition enquiry is pending and no case registered against the petitioner and no harassment. 3. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed....
Gopal Vs. The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct therespondent herein not to harass the petitionerunder the guise of enquiry.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct therespondent herein not to harass the petitionerunder the guise of enquiry. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that the petitioner himself gave a complaint, petition enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed in C.S.R.No.794 of 2015 . 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »