Central Information Commission Cic Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr.S Ajith Prasad Vs. Ut of Andaman and Nicobar
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000832/15013 Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000832 Complainant : Mr. S Ajith Prasad Advocate, District and Sessions Courts, Port Blair, Andamand & Nicobar Public Information Officer UT of Andaman & Nicobar, O/o the Deputy Commissioner, South Andaman, Port Blair, Andaman & NicobarRespondent:Facts arising from the Complaint: The Complainant had filed a RTI application with the Respondent PIO on 12/05/2011 asking for certain information. On not having received any information within the mandated time the Complainant filed a Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act before the Commission. On this basis, the Commission issued a notice to the Respondent PIO on 09/08/2011 with a direction to provide the information to the Complainant and further sought an explanation for not furnishing the information within the mandated time. The Commission has neithe...
Mr.S Mohammed Rajih Vs. Indian Overseas Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000798/15006 Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000798 Complainant : Mr. S Mohammed Rajih Trend Leather City and Plastic Fantasy, Ground Floor, City Center, Thrissur, Kerela-680001 CPIO & Assistant General Manager Indian Overseas Bank, Ernakulam Brach, Opp. Kavitha Theatre, M.G Road, ErnakulamRespondent:Facts arising from the Complaint: The Complainant had filed a RTI application with the Respondent No.1 on 18/04/2011 asking for certain information. On not having received any information within the mandated time the Complainant filed a Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act before the Commission. On this basis, the Commission issued a notice to the Respondent on 27/07/2011 with a direction to provide the information to the Complainant and further sought an explanation for not furnishing the information within the mandated time. The Commission is ...
Shri. Suresh Kumar Vs. Syndicate Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001066/SG/14986 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001066/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Suresh Kumar 11/583 Rishi Nagar Sonepat (HR) 131001 Mr. M. K. Jain PIO & DGM Syndicate Bank Zonal Office Bhagwan Dass Road Sarojini House New Delhi- 110001 24/09/2010 12/11/2010 08/12/2010 03/01/2010 31/03/2011Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order on Second Appeal received on: : : : :Certified photocopies of the detail/documents duly rubber stamp affixed theron in respect of your employee and a member of the Bankers Welfare Co-op (S.E) Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. 11/583, Rishi Nagar, and Sonepat (HR) 131001 Sl. Information Sought 1. What action has been taken on letter no BW/23 dated 02/10/2002 sent by Regd. Of post to the Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank, Delhi Cantt. Delhi....
Mr.R L Goyal Vs. United Commercial Bank (Uco)
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000848/15016 Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000848 Complainant : Mr .R L Goyal House No. 560, Old Kasauli Road, Kalka-133302 (Distt. Panchkula) Central Public Information Officer UCO Bank, Zonal Office, Bank Square, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh- 160017Respondent:Facts arising from the Complaint: The Complainant had filed a RTI application with the Respondent on 04/04/2011 asking for certain information. On not having received any information within the mandated time the Complainant filed a Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act before the Commission. On this basis, the Commission issued a notice to the Respondent on 09/08/2011 with a direction to provide the information to the Complainant and further sought an explanation for not furnishing the information within the mandated time. The Commission is in receipt of the Respondents submissions vide ...
Mr.Dusmantabehera Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No. CIC/AD/A/2011/001827 Date of Hearing : October 3, 2011 Date of Decision : October 3, 2011Parties: Appellant Shri Dusmanta Behera 33, Lord Buddha Apartment, Near Inder Enclave, Peeragarhi, New Delhi The Appellant was present through his representative, Shri Rakesh Kumar. Respondents M/o Railway, Railway Board, New Delhi Represented by: Shri Yasir Rizvi, Section Officer Information Commissioner : Mrs. Annapurna Dixit ___________________________________________________________________In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No: CIC/AD/A/2011/001827 ORDER Background1. The Applicant filed his RTIapplication dated 18.05.2011 with the PIO, Railway Board, New Delhi, seeking certain information about the concession on Railway ticket being provided to the PIBaccredited media personnel doing journalistic work . The PIO, on 31.05.2011, forwarded a pointwise reply of Traf...
Mr.J O Vashishtha Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No: CIC/AD/A/2011/001614Date of Hearing : October 3, 2011 Date of Decision : October 3, 2011 Parties: Applicant Shri J.O.Vashistha Office1 Plot No.75, Sec1/A Near Hero Honda Show Room Gandhidham Kachchh 370 201 Gujarat The Applicant was not present during the hearing. Respondents Western Railway Divisional Railway Managers Office Ahmedabad Division AhmedabadRepresented by : Shri R.S.Bhuriya, CPIO & DPO NIC Studio, AhmedabadInformation Commissioner: Mrs. Annapurna Dixit___________________________________________________________________In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No: CIC/AD/A/2011/001614 ORDERBackground 1.The Applicant filed an RTI Application dt.25.2.11 with the PIO, DRM Office, Western Railway, Ahmedabad seeking the following information for the period 1989 to 2011: i) When DRM Office is going to pay MACP arrears to Shri B.O.Vashistha, Train Clerk. Please inform the dat...
Mr.Ashwani Kumar Avasthi Vs. Indian Overseas Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000842/SG/14996 Appeal No.CIC/SM/A/2011/000842/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Avasti H.No. 1/307 Moh. Govind Colony T Road Aligarh (UP)-202001Respondent:Mr. V. C. Ramchandran, PIO & Dy. General Manager Indian Overseas Bank 763 Anna Salai Chennai-600002 08/11/2010 24/12/2010 01/01/2011 08/02/2011 : 03/03/2011RTI application filed on : PIO replied on : First appeal filed on : First appellant authority replied on: Second appeal received on S.No. Information sought 1. Details of marks secured by the appellant with the minimum cut off marks. Reply of PIO2.3. 4. 5.Marks Weightage Weighted score 1. Test of reasoning 15 1.60 24.00 2. Test of numeric 23 1.60 36.80 ability 3. Test of clerical 34 0.80 27.20 aptitude 4. Test of English 10 * * language 88.0 Photocopy of OMR The examination is conducted by institute...
Mr.Pradeepraj Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No. CIC/AD/A/2011/001863 Date of Hearing : October 3, 2011 Date of Decision : October 3, 2011Parties: Appellant Shri Pradeep Raj, 372 E, Mandir Marg, Chajjupur, Shahdara, Delhi The Appellant was heard through audioconference. Respondents M/o Railways Railway Board New Delhi Represented by: Shri S.K. Roy, ASC/PS and Shri Sarfaraj Alam, Astt. Sec. Information Commissioner : Mrs. Annapurna Dixit ___________________________________________________________________In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No: CIC/AD/A/2011/001863 ORDERBackground1. The present appeal relates to the Applicants RTIapplication dated 01.04.2011, filed with the PIO, Railway Board, New Delhi, which contained a series of questions in respect of various schemes and facilities extended by the M/o Railways to the physically challenged people. In response to this application, the PIO, Railw...
Mr.Rajesh Kumarmeena Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No. CIC/AD/A/2011/001854 Date of Hearing : October 3, 2011 Date of Decision : October 3, 2011Parties: Appellant Shri Rajesh Kumar Meena H No. 76, Aditya Awaas Police Line, Kota Rajasthan PIN 324 001 The Appellant was heard through audioconference. Respondents Northern Railway Office of Divisional Railway Manager, State Entry Road, New Delhi Represented by: Shri S.P. Mahi, Appellate Authority, Shri Jagjit Singh, Sr. DMM and Shri S.P. Sharma, DPO II Information Commissioner : Mrs. Annapurna Dixit ___________________________________________________________________In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No: CIC/AD/A/2011/001854ORDER Background1. The Applicant filed his RTIapplication dated 26.02.2011 with the PIO, Northern Railway, DRM office, New Delhi, seeking certain information about his pay fixation. This application was replied to by the PIO on ...
Mr.Vasudevsharma Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-03-2011
In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No. CIC/AD/A/2011/001855 Date of Hearing : October 3, 2011 Date of Decision : October 3, 2011Parties: Appellant Shri Vasudev Sharma Gram+Post Rasulpur Rithori, Distt. Bulandsehar Pin 203202 U.P. The Appellant was not present. Respondents Northern Railway Head office, Baroda House, New Delhi Represented by: Shri D.K. Pandey, CIO, Shri Anshuman, Dy. Com, Shri Rakesh Tyagi, DGM/Law, and Shri N.R.S. Yadav, AOM/G Information Commissioner : Mrs. Annapurna Dixit___________________________________________________________________In the Central Information Commission at New DelhiFile No: CIC/AD/A/2011/001855ORDER Background1. The Applicant filed his RTIapplication dated 18.02.2011 with the PIO, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi, seeking information against 9 items all related to the movement of suburban trains between Aligarh and Delhi stations. The PIO, on 24.03.2011, forwarded t...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »