Central Information Commission Cic Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr.Srikant Tiwari Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-13-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000846 Complainant : Shri Srikant Tiwari C K 16/32, Suriya Varanasi 221001. The Public Information Officer DRM Office North Eastern Railway Gorakhpur Division Gorakhpur. Dated : 13.10. 2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 22.11.10 from Shri Srikant Tiwari against the PIO, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur Division under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 22.11.20110. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO DRM Office, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur is directed as follows: a) In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant t...
Mr.Shamsher Singh Vs. Delhi Police
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-13-2011
Central Information CommissionRoom No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi 110067 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26161997 Case No. CIC/SS/C/2011/900551 Name of Complainant Name of Respondent : : Mr. Shamsher Singh Delhi Police, PHQ. ORDER The Commission has received a complaint dated Nil (received on 4.4.2011) from Mr. Shamsher Singh u/s 18 of the RTI Act, 2005, against the Delhi Police, PHQ for deemed refusal to his RTI request dated 9.11.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under sections 19 and 18 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, this case is remitted to CPIO, Commissioner of Police, PHQ, New Delhi (along with copy of complaint and RTI-request), with the following directions:(i)In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant to his RTI-request dated 9.11.2010, CPIO should furnish a reply to the complainant within two weeks of receipt of this order. In case CPIO has already given a reply to the complainant in the matter, he...
Mr.Om Prakash Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-13-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000873 Complainant : Shri Om Prakash Sr.Clerk CR Deptt Northern Railway, Hazratganj, Lucknow. The Public Information Officer DRM Office Northern Railway Lucknow Division Lucknow. Dated : 13.10. 2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 15.4.11 from Shri Om Prakash against the PIO, DRM Office, Northern Railway, Lucknow Division, Lucknow under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 9.12.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO DRM Office, Northern Railway, Lucknow Division, Lucknow is directed as follows: a) In cas...
Mrs.Baijayantisahu Vs. Indian Airlines
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-13-2011
Central Information CommissionRoom No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi 110067 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26161997 Case No. CIC/SS/C/2011/900553 Name of Complainant Name of Respondent : : Mrs. Baijayanti Sahu Air India Ltd. ORDER The Commission has received a complaint dated 19.7.2011 from Mrs. Baijayanti Sahu u/s 18 of the RTI Act, 2005, against the Air India Ltd. for deemed refusal to her RTI request dated 11.4.2011. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under sections 19 and 18 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, this case is remitted to CPIO, Air India Ltd., New Delhi (along with copy of complaint and RTI-request), with the following directions:(i)In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant to her RTI-request dated 11.4.2011, CPIO should furnish a reply to the complainant within two weeks of receipt of this order. In case CPIO has already given a reply to the complainant in the matter, he should furnish a copy of his rep...
Mr.Munni Devi Shakyabar Vs. Allahabad Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001623/SG/15153 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001623/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Munni Devi Shakyavar 429 Durga Bhawan Near Railway Jhansi Outer Signal New Ram Nagar Orai- District Jalaun (UP) CPIO & DGM Allahabad Bank Zonal Office 113/58, Swaroop Nagar, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 19/05/2010 26/05/2010 10/06/2010 16/07/2010 26/11/2010Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order on Second Appeal received on: : : : :Information Sought: When the Appellants husband, Shri SP Shakyayar, was transferred from Bhopal Zone to Home-Town Jalaun, he was penalized for being a laborious and extremely honest person of Scheduled Tribe & forced to work as Senior Manager (operations) at Orai Branch in Second-line, whereas the most corrupt persons of higher castes were made Branch Head...
Mr.Chand Singh Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Old JNU Campus, Opposite Ber Sarai, New Delhi -110067 Tel: + 91 11 26161796Decision No.CIC/SM/A/2010/001621/SG/15150 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001621/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Chand Singh Guru Hargobind Nagar, Chahai Road, By-Pass, Backside hand Marriage Palace Faridkot-151203 (PB) : Mr. Surjeet Singh Sachdeva PIO & Chief Manager Punjab and Sind Bank Noble Enclave, Bhaibala Chowk Zonal Office Ludhiana-Punjab Mr. A. S. Jolly PIO & Chief Manager Punjab and Sind Bank Risk Management Department RTI Cell, H.O. 7th Floor, Bank House, 21, Rajendra Place, New Delhi 27/08/2010 20/09/2010 28/09/2010 08/11/2010 25/11/2010Respondent(1)(2):RTI application filed on PIO replied First Appeal filed on Order of First Appellate Authority Second Appeal received on: : : : :Information Sought: Information regarding names of officials who were staying at places other than the place of posting and were paid HRA in 2005 for the last...
Shri. Dhrubajyoti Saikia Vs. United Bank of India
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001146/SG/15145 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001146/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant:Mr. Dhrubajyoti Saikia House No. 38 Pub Sarania Via 9th Bylane, Rajgarh Road Guwahati 781003 Mr. Elango Public Information Officer & AGM United Bank of India Nathun Bazar, Charila, Nagaon 782001. 12/09/2010 09/12/2010 06/12/2010 29/12/2010 06/04/2011Respondent:RTI application filed on : PIO replied on : First appeal filed on : First appellant authority replied on: Second appeal received on :Information Sought: Following information sought in respect of loan sanctioned to m/s Dragon Cement Industries Pvt. Ltd.1. On which date the loan application, if any, was received from M/s Dragon Cement IndustriesPvt. Ltd. 2. On which date the loan was sanctioned.3. On which date was the first installment of loan disbursed & what was the amount and for wha...
Mr.Kailash Narayan Dave Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000799 Complainant : Shri Kailash Narayan Dave Chandpol Dwar Bahar Jodhpur Rajasthands U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Dated : 12.10. 2011 Respondents:The Public Information Officer M/o Railways, Railway Board Rail Bhawan Raisina Road New Delhi.Commission has received a complaint petition dated 28.3.11 from Shri Kailash Narayan Dave against the PIO, M/o Railways, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 9.12.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO M/o Railways, Railway Board, New Delhi is directed as follows: a) In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the compla...
Mr.S P Goyal Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/01614/SG/15154 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/01614/SG Appellant : Mr. S. P. Goyal, 103 A, Krishna Chambers, 59 Near Marine Lines, Mumbai-400020 : P.I.O. Punjab and Sind Bank Fitwell house, LBS Marg, Vikhroli, Mumbai-400083 : : : : : 22/06/2010 05/07/2010 15/07/2010 26/08/2010 13/11/2010RespondentRTI application filed on PIO replied First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order Second Appeal filed onInformation sought: Receipt date of notice by SP Garg by the bank its file no., Number of copies of documents in the file, action taken on notice, officer in charge, inspection request for the above said file and the date on which notice was intimated to Zonal Central or Regional Office. Reply of PIO: Information comes under section 8(1)(j), exempted cannot be provided. Grounds for First Appeal: Section 8(1)(j) doesnt applies to appell...
Mr.Arun Anand Vs. Mcd, Gnct Delhi
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002372/15159 Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002372 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Arun Anand, Chief Manager ICICI, 16, Cottage, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi -110008. Mr. Rakesh Mehta Public Information Officer & AC, Municipal Corporation of Delhi O/o The Asst. Commissioner, Karol Bagh Zone, Nigam Bhawan, D B Gupta Road, Anand Parbat, New Delhi -110005. 04-07-2011 13-07-2011 18-07-2011 Not ordered 02-09-2011 The PIO replied No, eligible squatters are found of family member of G/32, West Patel Nagar under Gainda Ram Scheme as per record.Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order of Second Appeal received on: : : : :S. No. Information sought. i Please confirm under MCD any of the undernoted persons (Family members) is enjoying the facility of TEHBAZARI under MCD Po...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »