Andhra Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Afzalunnisa Begum and Others Vs. Ireddy Sanjeeva Reddy (Died) Per ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
The unsuccessful appellants before the Joint Collector, Karimnagar filed the present Civil Revision Petition assailing the order in appeal No.C3/14339/89, dated 9-11-1990. The facts leading to the filing of the Civil Revision Petition are briefly stated hereunder: 16 items of land in various survey numbers of Konur village, Odela Mandal and 11 items of land in different survey numbers in Madipalli Mandal, Sreerampur Mandal, Karimnagar District were held by Md. Habeebuddin Farooqui, predecessor-in-interest of the appellants (hereinafter referred to as “the original land holder”). These lands were in occupation of the respondents or their predecessors-in-interest as protected tenants. The tenants approached the Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli for issue of ownership certificates under Section 38E of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short "the Act"). The Revenue Divisional Officer has accordingly granted the ownership certificates d...
S. Laxma Reddy and Another Vs. the District Collector and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2012
The petitioners state that their ancestors owned an extent of Ac.7.08 guntas of land in Survey No.383/2 of Torrur Village, Hayatnagr Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and that the said land was the subject matter of partition under Document No.2736 of 1976. It is also stated that Ac.3.00 of the said land was gifted to the 2nd petitioner through document No.769/91 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Vanasthalipuram, 2nd respondent herein. The first petitioner is said to be the owner of Ac.2.06 guntas of land. The petitioners intended to sell a part of the land referred to above. They claim to have approached the 2nd respondent herein with a request to furnish the particulars of market value, stamp duty, registration fee etc. Their grievance is that the 2nd respondent is refusing to furnish the particulars on the ground that the land in Survey No.383/2 was included in the list of Government properties and the 2nd respondent is enforcing the prohibition contained under Section 22-A of the Regist...
L. Gopal Singh, Hyd. Vs. Inspector General, Stamps and Registration an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2012
Reported in: 2012(4)ALT563
(Prayer: Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in collecting excess stamp duty on the rectification deed dated 11.10.2010 bearing document No. 1886/2010 to a tune of Rs.2,83,035/- instead of collecting stamp duty for the excess period of lease from 15 years to 30 years and also excess registration charges of Rs.4,085/- as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to return the excess stamp duty collected i.e. Rs.2,83,035/- and also excess registration charges of Rs.4,085/-.) M/s.Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited invited applications for establishment of a petroleum outlet at Jumarath Bazar, Hyderabad. The applicant must be either a owner of the land, which is required for establishment of the ...
Gundra Adilakshumma and Others Vs. Uppuluru Yella and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2012
This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners, who are plaintiffs in OS.No.508 of 2008, feeling aggrieved by Order, dated 17-11-2011, of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur, passed in IA.No.313 of 2009 in OS.No.508 of 2008. This Court has ordered notice to the respondent on 09-03-2012. Office report shows that notice was served on the respondent but no one entered appearance on his behalf. I have heard Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioners. The suit is for permanent injunction. The petitioners filed the aforesaid application for appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner. On 03-06-2009, the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur, has appointed one Sri P.Chandra Sekhar as Advocate-Commissioner inter alia for inspection, location, measurement of the entire extent of the suit schedule property with the help of the Mandal Surveyor and comparing the survey numbers with the Field Map Book available with the Mandal Surveyor. A direction wa...
M/S.Jagathi Publications Ltd., Rep. by Y.Eshwara Prasad Reddy Vs. Cent ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-02-2012
Common Order:- Since the facts of all these petitions are one and the same and common arguments have been advanced by both the learned counsel in all these petitions, they are being disposed of by this common order. Criminal Petition Nos.4593 and 4594 of 2012 have been filed by M/s. Jagati Publications Limited and V. Vijaya Sai Reddy (hereinafter referred to as ‘A-2’) respectively, seeking to set aside/quash the orders of the Principal Special Judge, CBI Cases, Hyderabad,(hereinafter referred to as ‘Special Judge’) dated 27.04.2012 made in R.C. No.19(A)/2011 taking cognizance of the final report submitted on 31.03.2012 and in issuing summons to the accused by assigning C.C. No.8 of 2012 and to direct the Special Judge to consider the taking of cognizance in the matter after entire investigation is completed. Criminal Petition No.4742 of 2012 has been filed challenging the order dated 28.05.2012 passed in C.C. No.8 of 2012 in R.C. No.19(A)/2011-CBI/HYD, by the Sp...