Andhra Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments

Kanagam Satyanarayana Vs. Thata Eswararao and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This appeal is by the claimant who had filed a claim petition in WC No. 190 of 1997 before the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-I, Guntur seeking compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- for the injuries he sustained in a motor accident. The appellant was working as a driver on lorry bearing No. ADT 4007 belonging to first respondent and in the course of employment, on 20.9.1996 an accident took place, as a result the appellant sustained injuries, and he was admitted in Government hospital at Vijayawada for treatment. He claimed that he was aged 40 years and earning monthly salary of Rs.2,000/- at the time of accident. First respondent-owner remained exparte, whereas second respondent-insurance company defended the claim of the appellant by denying the age, wages and extent of injuries as claimed by the appellant. Before the learned Commissioner, the appellant examined himself as AW-I and doctor as AW-II and no oral or documentary evidence was led...

Seetharama Swamy Temple, Rep. by Managing Trustee and Chairman, P. Ven ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD610

COMMON ORDER: 1. These two writ petitions are connected and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. Heard Smt. N.Indrani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in W.P.No.19883 of 2004, Sri Sitharam Chaparla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in W.P.No.21803 of 2004 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for the official respondents in both the cases. 3. Petitioner in W.P.No.19883 of 2004 is a Temple, viz., Sri Seetharama Swamy Temple (hereinafter referred to as ‘Temple’) situated in Suryaraopet locality of Kakinada Town, East Godavari District. Petitioners in W.P.No.21803 of 2004 claim to be the lessees of the said Temple. In both the writ petitions challenge is to the draft notification Ref.No.G2/8828/2003 dated 19.01.2004 published in the East Godavari District Gazette Extraordinary, dated 20.01.2004. issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity ‘the Act’) proposing to a...

V. Subba Rao Vs. Disciplinary Authority Cum Chief Manager Andhra Bank ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of 1st Respondent in compulsorily retiring the Petitioner vide Order dt.30.8.99 as confirmed by the 2nd Respondent vide Order dt.16.2.2000 as arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional and to issue consequential direction to the respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service with all consequential benefits.) This writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to declare the action of the first respondent in compulsorily retiring the petitioner from service vide order dated 30.08.1999 as confirmed by the second respondent vide order dated 16.02.2000 as arbitrary, unreasonable, unconstitutional and to issue consequential direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits. 2. The brief...

B. Venkata Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh Industries and Com ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Pinaki Chandra Ghose, ACJ. This appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 29908 of 2011. The facts of the case as stated by the writ petitioner are that he is holding a lease of Yeragama Sand Reach, Sarubujji Mandal, Srikakulam District.  The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Srikakulam issued an auction notification No. 4415/VG/2002, dated 22.6.2011 in respect of seized illegally excavated sand on the banks of Vamsadhara river within the limits of several villages of Srikakulam District including Karajada Village.  The quantity is about 8715 cubic meters, which, ought to be lifted within a month in terms of the said notification, which is also annexed to the appeal and being appearing at page 27 of the material papers. It appears that the 4th respondent was declared as the highest bidder in respect of the said auction and subsequently his bid was confirmed on 20.7.2011.  It has been  specifically mentioned in...

Smt. K.Nagarathnam Vs. Hindustan Fluorocarbons Ltd. Rep. by Its

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO W.P.No.9697 of 2000:27. 06.2012 Smt. K.Nagarathnam Hindustan Fluorocarbons Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. Counsel for the petitioner : Sri T.Sharath Counsel for respondent : Smt.G.Sudhaa HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. AIR 196.SC 180(1) 2. AIR 199.SC 180.3. AIR 200.SC 191.4. AIR 197.SC 694(1) 5. 1987 (SUPP) SCC 22.6. AIR 199.SC 157.7. AIR 200.SC 15.8. (2002) 3 SCC 43.9. 2011(5) SCC 14.ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking an order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the letter dated 20.05.1999 addressed by the respondent to the petitioner relieving her from duty pursuant to the acceptance of her resignation letter dated 20.02.1999 as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in her duties and to pass such other order granting all consequential benefits.2. The brief averments of the writ petition may be stated ...

V.Subba Rao Vs. Disciplinary Authority Cum Chief Manager

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WP.NO. 4584 OF 200.27.06.2012 V.Subba Rao Disciplinary Authority cum Chief Manager Andhra Bank and another !Counsel for the Applicant : Sri Vedula Srinivas Standing Counsel for respondent Bank: Sri K.Lakshminarasimha GIST: HEAD NOTE: Cases referred:1. (2012) 3 SCC 17.2 AIR 196.SC 182.3 (1995) 6 SCC 27.4 (2005)8 SCC 35.5 (2006) 8 SCC 77.6 (2006) 7 SCC 21.7 AIR 198.SC 50.8 AIR 198.SC 136.9 2011(5) SCC 14.ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to declare the action of the first respondent in compulsorily retiring the petitioner from service vide order dated 30.08.1999 as confirmed by the second respondent vide order dated 16.02.2000 as arbitrary, unreasonable, unconstitutional and to issue consequential direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits.2. The brief averments of the writ petition may be stated as follows: The petitioner joined the service of Andhra Bank in the yea...

B. Venkata Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh Industr

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO.506 OF 201.27.06.2012 B. Venkata Rao The Government of Andhra Pradesh Industries and Commerce (SPIU & Sand) Department and others. Counsel for the Appellant : M/s. C.V.R. Rudra Prasad Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3:G.P. for Mines & Geology. Counsel for the Respondent No.4:G.P. for Mines & Geology : : Cases referred:2010. (2) ALD 28.(DB) JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose) This appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 29908 of 2011. The facts of the case as stated by the writ petitioner are that he is holding a lease of Yeragama Sand Reach, Sarubujji Mandal, Srikakulam District. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Srikakulam issued an auction notification No. 4415/VG/2002, dated 22.6.2011 in respect of seized illegally excavated sand on the banks of V...

Akash Enclave Residents Welfare Association, Rep. by Its Secretary and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

E.A.No.34/2010 The petitioner/complainant filed this PP seeking compliance of the orders inC.D.No.102/2001 which was filed claiming compensation against the opposite party and this Commission appointed an Advocate Commissioner and by order dated 31-12-2005 directed the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- to rectify the defects mentioned in Advocate Commissioners report and further directed the opposite party to pay Rs.1,000/- to each flat owner totalling to Rs.19,000/- towards damages and costs of Rs.2,000/-. The opposite party aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.102/2001 preferred appeal F.A.No.109/2006 before the Honble National Commission and the National Commission by order dated 23-3-2006 granted interim stay of execution of order dated 31-12-2005 on certain conditions and as it was not complied, the National Commission dismissed the appeal vide order dated 18-8-2010.The opposite party also preferred a SLP before the Honble Supreme Court and the Apex court vide its order dat...

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the District Collector Vs. Special Co ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Order: (V.V.S. Rao, J.) The State of Andhra Pradesh through its District Collector, Ranga Reddy District invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order of the Special Court constituted under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (the Act). By the said impugned order dated 24.6.2011 made in I.A.No.356 of 2011 in LGC No.40 of 2003 the Special Court rejected permission for amendment of the pleadings in concise statement filed in LGC. As per Section 8(1) of the Act and the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Rules, 1988 (the Rules), every applicant including the State alleging land grabbing by others has to submit the case in Form No.1, Column-15 that requires the applicant to file concise statement of the claims. Be it also noted, if the Special Court finds prima facie case of land grabbing as defined, it has to take cognizance of the LGC and direct publication of the cognizance in the Andhr...

St.AugustIn Educational Society and Others Vs. the Dental Council of I ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

COMMON ORDER: The subject-matter in both the writ petitions is the same. Hence, they are disposed of together. The 1st petitioner in W.P.No.17192 of 2012 is an Educational Society; the 2nd petitioner therein is an Institute of Dental Sciences, established by the 1st petitioner at Nizamabad (for short ‘the College’) and the 3rd petitioner is the Vice President of the Society. The petitioners in W.P.No.17223 of 2012 are 43 students, who were admitted into the first year of the course, in the academic year 2009-2010. The 2nd petitioner was established as a minority institution to conduct five years BDS course. Its approved strength is 100 for each academic year. It is affiliated to Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, the 2nd respondent (for short ‘the University’), and approved by the Dental Council of India, the 1st respondent herein. In the year 2009, the college enjoyed the minority status and the admissions into the college are under two categories. A- categ...