Andhra Pradesh Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gutha Narayana Rao Vs. the District Collector, Guntur and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-13-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD W.P. No.33490 of 2011 and W.P. No.249 o13. 02/2012 Gutha Narayana Rao The District Collector, Guntur and others COUNSEL FOR THE WRIT PETITIONER: Sri Ancha Panduranga Rao COUNSEL FOR 1 TO 4 RESPONDENTS: G.P. for Revenue ^COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.5: Sri G. Elisha COUNSEL FOR 6 AND 7 RESPONDENTS: Sri Kasa Jagan Mohan Reddy +W.P. No.249 of 2012 #Konikineni Satyanarayana $The District Collector, Guntur District,Guntur and others !COUNSEL FOR THE WRIT PETITIONER: Sri Posani Venkateswarlu ^COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1: G.P. for Revenue COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.2: G.P. for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.3: G.P. for R & B Department COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.4: G.P. for Home COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.5: Sri G. Elisha COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.6: Sri K. Suresh Reddy COMMON ORDER: Writ Petition No.33490 of 2011 is for a direction to the Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur and Tahsildar, Sattenapalli Mandal to s...
Sri Mantena Vijaya Varma, Managing Partner and Another Vs. Kesanakurti
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-13-2012
(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.191/2006 on the file of Dist Forum-1, Visakhapatnam, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the absolute owner of a house site measuring 293 sq. yards and constructed RCC building thereon bearing D.No.49-26-3/1 and also owns a Madras Terrace House consisting two portions and ACC roof shed in an extent of Rs.364.42 Sq.yards with D.No.49-26-3. The complainant submits that the second opposite party who is the builder carrying on the business of construction of apartments approached the complainant and requested him to give his property for development and offered a price of Rs.7,250/- per sq.yard for which he agreed to demolish the ACC shed and other ACC structures on the Northern side belonging to the complainant and to construct a building with two floors about 1961.74 sq.ft. i.e. 980.87 sft. each floor and two balconies of 3...
The Madanapalle Cloth Merchants Associat Vs. the Madanapalle Municipal ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.29 o11. 02.2012 The Madanapalle Cloth Merchants Association, rep. by its Secretary, Chittoor district. The Madanapalle Municipality rep. by its Commissioner, Madanapalle, Chittoor district and another Counsel for appellant: Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala Counsel for Respondents : Standing Counsel for Municipalities HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred JUDGMENT: The appellant filed O.S.No.76 of 2001, in the Court of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Madanapall, Chittoor District, for the relief of declaration and injunction, restraining the respondents from levying the market fee on shops dealing with the business of cloths and readymade garments. Through the notification dated 12-01-1999, issued by the Madanapalle Municipal Council, the 2nd respondent herein, and published in the Chittoor gazette, it proposed to levy licence fee on various establishments functioning within the limits of Municipality, the 1st respondent. The grievance of the appe...
The Chairman, National Airports Authorit Vs. K. Subhash and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao) 1. This Appeal has been preferred by the National Airports Authority and its officers against the Judgment rendered by the learned single Judge, who allowed the writ petition instituted by the 1st respondent herein. 2. The 1st respondent writ petitioner was appointed as a Sweeper / Safaiwala by the Director, Hyderabad Airport, with effect from 03-12-1971. He was confirmed as such during August 1976. Pursuant to the National Airports Authority Act, 1985 (Act No.64 of 1985), various civil aviation airports have been constituted to form the National Airports Authority of India (henceforth referred to as 'the Authority'). All the employees of the Civil Aviation Department working, other than in the wings of Airworthiness and Air safety, were permanently absorbed in the service of the Authority with effect from 08-10-1989. All such employees were also entitled to reckon the past service rendered in the Civil Aviation Department. The ...
Manne Srinivasa Rao So Anjaiah, Aged 29 Vs. Regalla Uma, Wo. Satyanara ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
J U D G M E N T : 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant. Though served with notice, none appeared for the respondents. 2. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the award dated 06-05-1996 passed in MVOP.No. 1221 of 2004 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Khammam. 3. The learned Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim-petition filed by the appellant-claimant under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking compensation of Rs.1,50,000=00 for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident on the ground that the appellant failed to prove the alleged involvement of the vehicle namely the car bearing No.GJ-2K-6632 in the accident. Challenging the said finding, the present appeal is filed. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that even though there is evidence of PW-1 showing the involvement of the car bearing No.GJ-2K- 6632 in the accident and also that the accident occurred due to the rash a...
Manne Srinivasa Rao S/O Anjaiah, Aged 29 Vs. Regalla Uma, W/O. Satyana ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO MACMA.NO. 1889 OF 200.10-02-2012 Manne Srinivasa Rao s/o Anjaiah, aged 29 years, Occ. Clerk in Sirigala Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd., R/o.H.No. 7-1-14, Sahakaranagar, Khammam Town & district. Regalla Uma, w/o. Satyanarayana and another Counsel for the appellant: M/s. Ravulapati Sreenivasa Rao Counsel for the respondents : None appeared JUDGMENT : Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant. Though served with notice, none appeared for the respondents. 2. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the award dated 06-05-1996 passed in MVOP.No. 1221 of 2004 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Khammam. 3. The learned Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim-petition filed by the appellant-claimant under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking compensation of Rs.1,50,000=00 for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident on the ground that the appellant failed to prove the alleged invo...
Sunil Dalvai Vs. Tata Capital Limited, Rep. by Its Regional Sales Mana ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.460/2009 on the file of Dist Forum-III, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is doing business of post production work of Movies-DVDs. In the first week of August,2008 the complainant purchased Toyota Innova vehicle bearing no.AP.37 X 7010 from J.Ravi Kumar, Bhimavaram, West Godavari Dist. The said vehicle was transferred in the name of the complainant in the first week of November,2008 and the number of the said vehicle was re registered as AP 16 AS 8719. In the second week of August, 2008, the complainant approached opp.party no.1 for loan on the said vehicle, who, in turn sent the complainant to opp.party no.2 for arranging the said loan. Opposite party no.2 informed the complainant that he is the direct sales agent of opp.party no.1 and he will arrange the loan on the said vehicle from opp.party no.1 company. Opposi...
Ms.Gutta Anjaneyulu and Co.Rep. by Shri B Vs. Commissioner of Income-t ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-09-2012
MADAN B.LOKUR1. The assessee is aggrieved by an order of the Tribunal dated 02.08.1999 in ITA No.1656(Hyd)/1992 relating for the assessment year 1972-73. The order has been passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bench 'B', Hyderabad, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal').2. In this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act') the following substantial questions of law have been framed for our consideration:"1) Whether the Tribunal's approach that the assessee has to prove the non-service of notice under Sec.148 of the Act and the "department has to prove the negative", is in conformity with law?2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, it can be said that the re-assessment proceedings have been concluded without service of notice on the assessee?3) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, for the purpose of making an assessment on the body of individuals where an assessment was reopened in the status of a...
Ms. Mohamadiya and Company,a Partnership Vs. Smt. C. Uma and ors
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-09-2012
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.JUDGMENT:1. An interesting, nay, an important question arises for adjudication of this court. The question is whether with the fixation of fair rent for the demised premises in excess of Rs.3500/- per month, the jurisdiction of the Rent Controller is ousted and consequently the order of eviction passed by him, as confirmed in appeal, is without jurisdiction? The brief facts leading to the case are recounted hereunder:2. The petitioners are the tenants of premises bearing No.3-6-564/7, situated at Himayathnagar, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as "the demised premises"). The demised premises belongs to respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as "the landlady"). The tenancy was oral and the agreed rent for the demised premises was Rs.1100/- per month. The landlady filed two petitions before the learned II Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as "the Rent Controller"). She filed R.C.No.468/2006 for fixation of fair rent and R.C.No.470/...
Seepana Rajeswari Vs. Seepana Raja Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-09-2012
GHULAM MOHAMMED, J.JUDGMENT: 1. Aggrieved by the order and Decree dated 16.09.2005 passed in M.O.P.No. 8 of 2003 by the Senior Civil Judge, Rajam, Srikakulam District, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed. 2. Appellant herein is the respondent-wife and the respondent herein is the petitioner-husband in M.O.P.No. 8 of 2003. 3. For brevity and for better understanding, the parties as arrayed in the Lower Court are similarly arrayed in the present appeal. 4. The husband filed M.O.P.No. 8 of 2003 against the wife under Section 13 (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act for passing a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion. The trial Court on going through the evidence available on record, allowed the petition by granting divorce against the wife. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the wife. 5. The learned counsel for the appellant while placing reliance on the appeal grounds mainly urged that because of the conduct of the husband that he was having...