Andhra Pradesh Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshmi Narayana Puli S/O Puli Narasimhu Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Li ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2012
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKUR AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.17 OF 201.07-02-2012 Lakshmi Narayana Puli S/o Puli Narasimhulu, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Chief LPG Manager and another JUDGMENT (Per Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar) Candidature of the appellant, selected for award of the Indane Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Distributorship at Yerraguntla, Kadapa District, was cancelled by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited under proceedings dated 13.10.2009 on the ground that he had furnished wrong information. His challenge to the said proceedings in Writ Petition No.22739 of 2009 having failed, the appellant is now before us. Earlier invalidation of the appellant's candidature on the same ground under the Corporation's proceedings dated 10.03.2009 was set aside by this Court in W.P.No.6694 of 2009 as the appellant was not given any notice or opportunity prior thereto. The Corporation was however given the liberty to initiate the process ...
M. Rajender Kumar and Others Vs. Ghmc, Rep by Its Commissioner and Spe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2302 o07. 02-2012 The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P,Hyderabad Avu Venkataramana and 3 others Counsel for the Appellant : Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent: Smt.M.Bhaskara Lakshmi Cases referred:1. AIR 1954(SC) 39 = 1954 CrLJ-335 2. (1972)1 Supreme Court Case3. (1976)1 Supreme Court Cases 621 JUDGMENT : This is an appeal against acquittal filed by the State. The Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Bobbili by judgment dated 26.02.2003 in C.C. No.282 of 1996 acquitted the respondents 1 to 4/A-1 to A-4 of the offence under Section 411 I.P.C. A-1 and A-2 are brothers. A-1 is a licensed stamp vendor of Sitanagaram. He was conducting sale of stamps in a bunk abutting compound wall of Sub-Registrar's office, Bobbili. A-3 and A-4 are alleged to be close associates of A-1. It is alleged that on 27.11.1996 after closing the transactions, sale proceeds of the stamps to the tune of Rs.43,247/- w...
Kunapareddy Prasad,s/O Sri Sitaramaiah, Vs. the District Collector,wes ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2302 o07. 02-2012 The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P,Hyderabad Avu Venkataramana and 3 others Counsel for the Appellant : Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent: Smt.M.Bhaskara Lakshmi Cases referred:1. AIR 1954(SC) 39 = 1954 CrLJ-335 2. (1972)1 Supreme Court Case3. (1976)1 Supreme Court Cases 621 JUDGMENT : This is an appeal against acquittal filed by the State. The Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Bobbili by judgment dated 26.02.2003 in C.C. No.282 of 1996 acquitted the respondents 1 to 4/A-1 to A-4 of the offence under Section 411 I.P.C. A-1 and A-2 are brothers. A-1 is a licensed stamp vendor of Sitanagaram. He was conducting sale of stamps in a bunk abutting compound wall of Sub-Registrar's office, Bobbili. A-3 and A-4 are alleged to be close associates of A-1. It is alleged that on 27.11.1996 after closing the transactions, sale proceeds of the stamps to the tune of Rs.43,247/- w...
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P Vs. Avu Venkataramana and 3 O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2302 o07. 02-2012 The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P,Hyderabad Avu Venkataramana and 3 others Counsel for the Appellant : Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent: Smt.M.Bhaskara Lakshmi Cases referred:1. AIR 1954(SC) 39 = 1954 CrLJ-335 2. (1972)1 Supreme Court Case3. (1976)1 Supreme Court Cases 621 JUDGMENT : This is an appeal against acquittal filed by the State. The Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Bobbili by judgment dated 26.02.2003 in C.C. No.282 of 1996 acquitted the respondents 1 to 4/A-1 to A-4 of the offence under Section 411 I.P.C. A-1 and A-2 are brothers. A-1 is a licensed stamp vendor of Sitanagaram. He was conducting sale of stamps in a bunk abutting compound wall of Sub-Registrar's office, Bobbili. A-3 and A-4 are alleged to be close associates of A-1. It is alleged that on 27.11.1996 after closing the transactions, sale proceeds of the stamps to the tune of Rs.43,247/- w...
K.Subbarayudu Vs. B.Jaganmohan Reddy and anr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2012
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J.Order:1. This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 19-10-2010, in IA.No.835 of 2010 in OS.No.54 of 2010, on the file of the Court of the learned Principal District Judge, Kadapa.2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit filed by him for recovery of certain amounts from the respondents. The petitioner filed IA.No.835 of 2010 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'CPC'), for a direction to respondent No.1 to deposit the suit amount as security. This application was dismissed on the ground that the same was not traceable to any particular provision of law under the CPC. Hence, the present Civil Revision Petition by the petitioner.3. At the hearing, Sri TVS.Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that, since there is no specific provision under which the relief claimed by his client can be granted, the petitioner has invoked the inherent powers of the Court under Section 151 CPC. I am afraid this submission ...
A.Dwarakanath Reddy Vs. the State of A.P. Represented by Princip
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2012
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.ORDER:1. The petitioner is the owner of Acs. 3.51 cents of land in survey No.156/3 of Kogileru Village, Peddapanjani Mandal, Chittoor District. It is stated that over an extent of Ac.0.26 cents of land, some of the villagers, particularly from Basavaraju Kandriga Village have constructed huts. Complaining that the authorities of the Revenue Department are proposing to dispossess him from the rest of the land, the petitioner filed O.S.No.467 of 1993 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Punganur. He has also filed I.A.No.1514 of 1993 for temporary injunction. The respondents are said to have filed a counter in the I.A. stating that Ac.0.26 cents of land of the petitioner is already under the occupation of landless poor and that they do not intend to take possession of any further extent and that I.A. was ordered on 15.07.1994. The petitioner submits that during the pendency of the suit, the respondents made a proposal to the effect that the petitioner should...
K.Subbarayudu Vs. B.Jaganmohan Reddy and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.2497 o06. 02-2012 K.Subbarayudu B.Jaganmohan Reddy and another ^Counsel for the petitioner: Sri TVS.Kumar !Counsel for the respondents: --- Order: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 19-10-2010, in IA.No.835 of 2010 in OS.No.54 of 2010, on the file of the Court of the learned Principal District Judge, Kadapa. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit filed by him for recovery of certain amounts from the respondents. The petitioner filed IA.No.835 of 2010 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'CPC'), for a direction to respondent No.1 to deposit the suit amount as security. This application was dismissed on the ground that the same was not traceable to any particular provision of law under the CPC. Hence, the present Civil Revision Petition by the petitioner. At the hearing, Sri TVS.Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that, since there is no specific ...
M/S Bhagyanagar Investments and Trading Pr Vs. the Sub-registrar, Cham ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.9378 o06. 02-2012 M/s Bhagyanagar Investments & Trading Private Ltd.and others The Sub-Registrar, Champapet,R.R District & another Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K. Rama Krishna Reddy Counsel for respondents: G.P. for Revenue Sri M.A Mukheed, for R-2 Gist: Head Note: Citations:1. AIR 200.A.P 31.2) (1979) 2 SCC 46.JUDGMENT: The petitioners purchased different extents of land totalling to Ac.26.25 guntas in Sy.Nos.302 and part of 303 of Mamidipally to one of non-agricultural purposes. They paid a sum of Rs.1,06,50,000/- towards the stipulated fee. Permission was accorde The land was divided into plots and necessary deeds of transfer, in respect of places covered by roads and common areas in th April and November 2008. A sale deed dated 06-04-2009 executed in favour of one of the prospective purchasers of the petitio was presented for registration before the 1st respondent. The document was kept pending, by assigning n...
Hdfc Bank Limited Vs. S. Naveen Kumar
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2012
(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.369/2009 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad, the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is a businessman dealing with sale of cloth in Hyderabad and he purchased a motor cycle, BAJAJ CT 100, 2006 from Siddi Vinayaka Automobiles, Kachiguda Station Road, Hyderabad by availing loan from Centurion Bank of Punjab, Hyderabad Branch which was subsequently amalgamated with the HDFC Bank Ltd. i.e. the opposite party. The vehicle was registered in the name of the complainant under registration no. AP9-BD-4981 and he taken delivery of the vehicle. The complainant before purchase of the vehicle, out of the loan amount sanctioned to him by the opp.party, paid the initial down payment in cash as required by the opp.party and his signatures were obtained on printed forms before the vehicle was delivered to him. As demanded by the opp...
M.Pentaiah Vs. B.Parameshwar
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-03-2012
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J.Order:1. This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 09-09-2011, in IA.No.1005 of 2010 in OS.No.3884 of 2009, on the file of the learned XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. I have heard Sri Ch.Anjaneyulu, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record.2. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent for recovery of certain amount on a pronote (Ex.A.1). The petitioner entered defence, in which he has stated that even though he has signed on a blank pronote, its contents were subsequently filled and accordingly, Ex.A.1 was fabricated. After PW.2, who is stated to be the scribe, gave his evidence, the petitioner filed an application under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'the CPC') to recall PW.2 on the plea that the latter needs to be cross-examined as he did not know Telugu. Accordingly, at the instance of the petitioner, PW.2 was recalled. During the course of his fu...