Andhra Pradesh Court July 2009 Judgments

Chenna Rayudu Vs. the Managing Director Prabhat Agri Bio-tech Ltd. and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: D. Appa Rao, President: Appellant is unsuccessful complainant. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he purchased 8 packets of Prabhat sunflower hybrid seed each containing 2 Kgs on 2.9.2002 from R2 dealer manufactured by R1 paying Rs. 350/- per each packet. He sowed them in the second week of September, 2002 in 8 acres of land situated in Konganapadu village. Though there was flowering there was ill-filling of seeds in the heads of the plants leading to poor setting of 15% to 20% leaving the remaining flowers chaffy. The other farmers who had sown the very same seed suffered the very same fate. When the said fact was informed to Joint Director of Agriculture, Kurnool, and Agricultural Officer, Kallur Mandal, a team of Agricultural Officers, Government Officials visited the fields in the presence of representatives of respondents and observed that the seeds were adulterated. Though the respondents promised to reimburse the loss they did not do so, and therefore he...

Life Insurance Corporation of India Rep. by Its Divisional Manager Div ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: D. Appa Rao, President: 1) This is an appeal preferred by opposite party insurance company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it pay Rs. 1 lakh covered under the policy together with interest and costs. 2) The case of the complainants in brief is that complainant No. 1 is the wife, complainant Nos. 2 and 3 are minor children of the deceased Late Jithender Babu who obtained an insurance policy from the appellants on 28.9.2001 for Rs. 1 lakh. The panel doctor of the insurance company examined him and opined that he was free from ailments. While so, on 13.7.2002 he died of cardiac arrest at Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad (NIMS). She intimated the death along with necessary documents followed by legal notice for which the appellants sent repudiation letter alleging that the assured had suppressed the material facts that he was suffering from diabetes and hyper tension. In fact his death was sudden and he was not diabetic. The repudiation was unjust ...

C.V.S.K. Sharma (Dr.), I.A.S., Commissioner and Special Officer, Great ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(4)ALT796

D.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard both sides.2. This Contempt Appeal is directed against the order, dated 19-6-2009, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, in C.C. No. 839 of 2008, sentencing the appellants herein to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each to the respondent herein, within a period of two weeks from the date of said order, for depriving him of his livelihood and causing mental agony, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of seven days.3. Appellants are the respondents and the respondent is the petitioner, before the learned single Judge of this Court.4. For the sake of convenience, the appellants and the respondent will be referred to as 'the respondents' and 'the petitioner', respectively.5. The factual background of the case, in brief, is that when the property in dispute was sought to be acquired by the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (for brevity 'the Corporation') for the purpose of road widening, in the interest of public, the petitioner filed W.P. No. ...

Prohibition and Excise Superintendent and anr. Vs. Toddy Tappers Co-op ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(5)ALT39

P.V. Sanjay Kumar, J.1. The entitlement of the Excise Department to collect rentals for the period of the excise year anterior to the grant of licence and for the period during which the toddy shop was closed upon its own order, is in question.2. The learned Judge by order dated 11.07.2001 allowed W.P. No. 23595 of 1997 holding that there was no such entitlement. Hence, this appeal.3. The Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society, Addagutta, the respondent herein, was granted a licence on 25.11.1996 to establish and operate the toddy shop at a particular location in Addagutta. It is not in dispute that the respondent society did not transact any business from 01.10.1996, being the commencement of the excise year, upto 24.11.1996.The facts on record also establish that the Excise Department, vide Proceedings in Cr. No. B1/3401/96/P&E; dated 11.01.1997, itself directed the respondent society to close down the toddy shop. The shop remained closed from 11.01.1997 till 18.01.1997 when it was reope...

P.B. V.P. Vijay Chandra Vs. M/S. Margadarshi Chit Fund Ltd., Rep. by I ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: D. Appa Rao, President: 1) Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that the matter can be disposed off at the stage of admission. 2) The appellant is unsuccessful complainant. 3) The case of the complainant in brief is that he joined in the chit conducted by the appellant for a total value of Rs. 5 lakhs in the month of July, 2003 wherein he had to pay Rs. 10,000/- for a period of 50 months. He paid initial amount of Rs. 10,000/-. Though it has promised that he could bid in the month of August, 2003 he was only allowed to do so in the month of April, 2004. He became the highest bidder forgoing an amount of Rs. 2 lakhs out of Rs. 5 lakhs as he needed the amount urgently to invest in his business. Though he complied all the formalities and the respondent promised to release the amount within two weeks, he has waited for two more months, but it did not pay. Finally it has informed that the sureties were not accepted. Due to non-payment of the ...