Andhra Pradesh Court October 2009 Judgments

K. Venkatesh and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home (Courts.C ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(6)ALT483

Ghulam Mohammed, J.1. These two writ petitions raise common questions of law relating to the process of selection of women candidates for appointment by the method of direct recruitment to the post of Junior Civil Judges in the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service (henceforth referred to as 'Judicial Service') and hence they are heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment. Since the facts are not in dispute, we prefer to set out the facts in WP No. 27080 of 20089, as they were narrated to us.2. The writ petitioner possesses MA and LLB qualifications. He was enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh in November 2003 and has eversince been practising at Ranga Reddy District Courts, Hyderabad. Incidentally, he belongs to Backward Class - D category ('BC-D' for brevity).3. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh has initiated the process of recruitment to 105 posts of Junior Civil Judges in Judicial Service through the notification dated 14.5.2007 calling for ...

The State Bank of Hyderabad Rep. by Its Managing Director and ors. Vs. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT399

Ghulam Mohammed, J.1. Since these two writ appeals arise out of the order dated 02.05.2003 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 5925 of 1997, filed seeking to set aside the orders in DPD Nos. 1121, 135 and 224, dated 28.02.1996, 10.05.1995 and 13.06.1994 respectively, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. W.A. No. 1663 of 2003 is filed by the respondent-State Bank of Hyderabad in the writ petition and W.A. No. 439 of 2004 is filed by the writ petitioner-Ahmed Mohinuddin.3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they were arrayed in the writ petition.4. The facts stated are:The petitioner, while working as Manager, Grade-II, in the respondent Bank, was transferred from Bidar to Kamalanagar Branch and joined duty in July, 1975 and to undergo training at Trivendrum, he was relieved from the duty on 16.09.1976. While so, based on the complaint, dated 17.09.1976, given by a customer, namely, Bandappa Kalappa Gandge, of Kamalanagar Branch, the Deputy ...

Association of A.P. Sajjada Nasheens, Mutawallies and Khidmat Guzaran ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT112

Ghulam Mohammed, J.1. These two writ petitions are filed praying this Court to declare provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 (Central Act 43 of 1995) particularly Section 14 of the Wakf Act, unconstitutional, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 25 and 26 of the Constitution.2. WP No. 11349 of 1996 is filed by the Association of AP Saj jada Nasheens, Mutawallies & Khidmat Guzaran of Wakfs, Dargah Hazrath Shaikh-ji-hali, Urdu Shareef, Hyderabad, represented by its President Soofi Shah Mohd. Sabir Ali and WP No. 11728 of 1996 is filed by All India Shia Organization, Yakutpura, Hyderabad, represented by its Joint Secretary Mirza Mehdi Ali Baig. Since the relief sought for in these writ petitions is the same, they are taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by a common judgment.3. The facts in WP No. 11349 of 1996 are adverted to. It is stated that prior to the enactment of the Wakf Act, 1995, the Union Legislature had enacted the Wakf Act, 1954 and the provisions of the said...

State of A.P. Rep. by Its Principal Secretary to Govt., Revenue Depart ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT178

ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. Since the question involved in both the writ petitions is one and the same and both the O.As on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal are filed by the same applicant, namely, A. Ramulu, who is petitioner in W.P. No. 21739 of 2009 and 1st respondent in W.P. No. 19913 of 2009, as such these two writ petitions are being heard together and disposed of by a common order.2. Government filed W.P. No. 19913 of 2009 aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 7307, dated 3.7.2009, directing to consider the case of the applicant for promotion without reference to the disciplinary proceedings. The said interim order was made absolute by order 24.8.2009. The applicant, A. Ramulu filed W.P. No. 21739 of 2009 seeking writ of mandamus to declare the orders of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 6719 of 2009, dated 24.6.2009 and 24.8.2009 as illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same.W.P. No. 19913 of 2009:3. The 1st respondent filed O.A. No. 7307 of 2009 befo...

Suri Prem Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Home Af ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT354

D.S.R. Varma, J.1. The relief sought for in the writ petition is as follows:For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this writ petition it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may in the interests of justice be pleased to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the petitioners before this Hon'ble Court and to call for all the records pertaining to the investigation into Crime No. Rc.6(E)/CB/BSFC/BLR dt. 27th Dec, 1997 and the pursuant Judicial Proceedings thereon which include C.C. No. 24 of 2001 and also C.C. No. 22 of 2003 on the file of Court of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad, and declare the action of the CBI, BSFC, Bangalore, the 2nd respondent in not complying with the mandatory provisions of law viz., Section 105 and Section 105B Cri.P.C. as relates these petitioners herein, and by not serving summons or process on them, and acting on false and untrue grounds obtaining NBWs and the consequent acti...

A. Hanumantha Prasad and ors. Vs. Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisati ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT18

ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the order dated 19.03.2009 passed by the 1st respondent - Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisation - dismissing the petitioners from service under Rule 11(ix) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to Rules 14 & 15 of the said Rules.2. The facts, in brief, are as under:The petitioners herein are the employees of Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisation. They were initially working in the Regional Office at Hyderabad. Aggrieved by the decision of the Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisation (for short, 'CMPFO') to shift the Regional Office from Hyderabad to Godavarikhani, the Employees Union of CMPFO went on strike after issuing a strike notice dated 1.7.2005 under Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, 'ID Act'), On the intervention of the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), the strike was called off pursuant to an agreement dated 31.01.2006 signed betw...

Ch.Jaya Prakash Vs. Authorized Person

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order( Per Sri K.Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant. The case of the complainant as set out in the amended complaint is briefly as follows The complainant purchased a two wheeler under hypothecation from the opposite party. The vehicle was registered in his name. The certificate of registration was with the opposite party as per the terms and conditions of the hypothecation and it was marked to be obtained only after clearing the finance. The complainant claimed to have paid the entire finance loan amount due towards the said vehicle and no amount was outstanding due to the opposite party as on 22-7-2006. As such the opposite party was under an obligation to arrange for return of the certificate of registration to the complainant. However, the opposite party with held the said certificate of registration. So he claimed to have got issued a legal notice. The opposite party gave a reply with false and untenable allegations and asserted t...

V.Vidya Sagar Sharma Vs. Icici Bank Ltd., Represented by Its Collectio ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order( Per Sri K.Satyanand,Honble Member) Not satisfied with the relief granted by the District Forum, the complainant preferred this appeal. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The complainant obtained a car loan of Rs.1,50,000/- from the opposite party bank on 30-3-2001. The said vehicle was delivered to the complainant on 1-5-2001. The bank loan was marked to be discharged in 60 instalments of Rs.3,488/- per month. The complainant claimed to have paid instalments regularly till 18-11-2003 and yet the opposite party sized the vehicle on 12-1-2004 high handedly without any prior notice and with the help of unsocial elements. Subsequently the complainant approached the bank and they justified their seizure saying that the complainant fell in arrears to a tune of five instalmetns. He also claimed to have paid January instalment by way of a DD for Rs.5576/-. The complainant further alleged that on account of the unlawful seizure, he was deprived of the v...

Choppadandi Shanthamma Vs. the United India Insurance Company Ltd. and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order( Per Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant assailing the order of the District Forum and seeking relief she sought for in the complaint. The facts of the case briefly stated are as under: The complainant was a widow of late Choppadandi Kanaka Raju, a badili workman, owning a two wheeler. He obtained insurance from the opposite party No.1 in respect of the said vehicle for the period 25-11-2003 to 24-11-2004 for an amount of Rs.1 lakh. Whileso late KanaKa Raju met with an accident on 30-6-2004 near Pakistan camp at Ramakrsihnapur and sustained fatal injuries. The police concerned registered a case against the said Kanaka Raju under Section 337 of IPC and he was immediately shifted to MGM Warangal. On 2-7-2004 at about 9.00 am., he was shifted to NIMS for better treatment. There he succumbed to his injuries on 4-7-2004. The police Punjagutta registered a new crime and transferred the same to the Ramakrsihnapuram Police on point...

State Bank of India Life Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Konduri Arun Kumar ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order( Per Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the opposite party No.3, insurance company, assailing the order of the District Forum and seeking the dismissal of the order passed against it. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The complainants father by name, Kolluri Maruthi, had taken a house mortgage loan of Rs.2,00,000/- on 23-11-2004 from opposite party No.1 State Bank of Hyderabad branch, at Rampur branch at Karimnagar. It appears that opposite party No.3, insurance company floated a scheme by name Super Suraksha scheme to all the customers of opposite party no.1 who availed mortgage loans and within the range of 18 to 58 years of age. Under the said scheme, the sum assured was Rs.1,00,000/-. The premium amount of Rs.300/- was admittedly deducted from the account of the complainants father on 26-6-2005. While so the said insured Kolluri Maruthi died on 28-7-2005. As such the complainant as his only son put up the claim for t...