Andhra Pradesh Court October 2009 Judgments

Narapareddy Chaandra Sekhar Reddy Vs. Superintending Engineer (Operati ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Typed to the dictation of Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) The unsuccessful complainant filed this appeal assailing the order of the District Forum. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The complainant was enjoying agricultural service connection prior to 30-12-2000 on which date he decided to change it into fish pond service connection. In that connection, he claimed to have paid the entire agricultural arrears amounting to Rs.3,820/- on 4-11-2000 under bill No.78601 issued on the above said agricultural connection. Subsequently his service connection was disconnected on the ground that he had to pay arrears of Rs.3,200/- for the FPSC No.353 for the months of 6/01 and 7/01. The complainant therefore approached the second opposite party, Accounts Officer, and showed the bills. Thereupon the service connection was restored on the ground that the bills had come to be issued by mistake. However, the service connection was again disconnected on the ground that ...

K. NooruddIn and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Sec ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(6)ALT146

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. These three writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order in view of the commonality of the factual matrix of these cases and also the commonality of the questions of law which had been put forth by the learned Counsel representing the parties.2. Except certain slight variations, the pleadings of the respective parties, the affidavits filed in support of the writ petitions, the counter-affidavits and the reply affidavit also are substantially the same.3. Interim orders had been obtained and the same were modified subsequent thereto. All these writ petitions are filed by the writ petitioners challenging initiation of land acquisition proceedings proposing to acquire the lands of the petitioners specified in the respective writ petitions for the purpose of setting up LPG bottling unit for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Counter-affidavits had been filed on behalf of R-1, R-3, R-4 and R-2 as well. Reply affidavits also had been filed.4. Sri S. Niranj...

Managing Director, Apsrtc and anr. Vs. A. Annaiah

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT37

ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred by the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (for short, 'the Corporation') being aggrieved by the order of attachment dated 12.2.2009 passed in E.P. No. 11 of 2009 in O.S. No. 194 of 1996 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur.2. The facts which are not in dispute are as under:3. The respondent herein filed O.S. No. 9 of 1994 in the Court of the Additional District Judge, Hindupur, under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to direct the Corporation to file the agreement dated 31.8.1991 into Court and make an order of reference to the Arbitrator appointed by the Court for decision of his claim against the Corporation. The said suit which was renumbered as O.S. No. 194 of 1996 on transfer to the Sub-Court, Hindupur, was decreed on 17.4.1997 appointing Sri M. Rama Narasimhulu, a retired District Judge as the sole arbitrator. However, as the arbitrator so appointed was not willing to act as an A...

G. Muneswaran Vs. Chief Commissioner of Land Administration and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT185

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. Petitioner seeks invalidation of the order of August 2001 passed by the third respondent whereby and whereunder in purported exercise of power under Section 13-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act, for brevity), he deducted money awarded for Well and pipeline separately from total compensation, which was awarded earlier.2. Petitioner is owner of land admeasuring about Acs.0.17 1/2 in survey No. 764/3 and Acs.0.05 in survey No. 764/15 situated at Vadderappale village of Puthalapattu Mandal in Chittoor District. The said land and other lands of the village were acquired for public prupose, namely, construction of barrage across Ponnai river near Kalvakunta village. Third respondent passed award No. 8/2001-2002, dated 7-7-2001, awarding a sum of Rs. 1,52,778/- which includes land value and value for structures/well. The details - as tabulated in Land Acquisition Officer's award; are as follows:------------------------------------------------------------------...

Indian Overseas Bank, Tirupathi Rep. by Its Senior Manager Sri G.Vijay ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Typed to the dictation of Sri K. Satyanand, Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the opposite party assailing the order of the District Forum imposing the liability corresponding to the reliefs prayed by the complainant. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: A non resident couple by name Venkateswara Rao Anamolu and his wife, Sarojini Anamolu deposited an amount in US dollars by way of two deposits under FCNR RDB 3/79 and 1/79 with the opposite party bank, appellant on 29th December, 1979. Subsequently both of them died intestate on 31-5-1983 in a fire accident in the United States of America. The circuit court of Marion Country, West Virginia declared that the estate of the said V.R.Anamolu should devolve upon his mother, Smt.A.Sundramma. Later the said Sundramma also died on 25-4-1990 even before she got orders from the said court in the U.S. Subsequently the complainants 1 to 3 filed O.p.No.885/90 on the file of City Civil court, Hyderabad for probat...

Bhupender Singh Vs. Idea Cellular Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Typed to the dictation of Sri K. Satyanand, Honble Member) The unsuccessful complainant before the District Forum filed the appeal The facts of the case are briefly as follows: The complainant subscribed for mobile cell phone bearing No.9948095239 offered by the opposite parties. While availing the said connection, he opted for payment of bills through electronic clearance services. Accordingly he paid an initial amount of Rs.550/-. Subsequently he had taken an add on connection with number 9848046773. For both the connections, he took the option of electronic clearance. He claimed to have issued a cheque and also signed certain documents paving the way for clearing the bills through ECS. Satisfying themselves of the proper documentation, the phones were activated. In the month of August, 2005, he received bills for payment as also a message on his mobile phone from the opposite parties for payment of bills immediately. The complainant contacted the customer care services of the oppos...

Xps Cargo Services and Others Vs. M/S.Vanka Agro Foods, Rep. by Its Pr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Typed to the dictation of Sri K. Satyanand, Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the opposite parties before the District forum against whom the Forum passed an order imposing liability for deficiency in service. The facts of the case are briefly as follows: The complainant claimed to have engaged the services of the opposite parties who represent one and the same cargo service but at different levels on 9-9-2005 paying freight charges to send consistent cashew kernnels from Chirala to Sri Reshma Enterprises, Adarshnagar, Beergang, Nepal. According to the complainant, the said consignment was never delivered to the said consignee as intimated to it by the consignee party. As such, the complainant claimed to have issued notices to the opposite parties but with no effect. As such the complainant filed this consumer complaint claiming the value of the consignment quantified at Rs.98,800/- with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. as also compensation of Rs.10,000/- for causing annoyance...

Ch. Kamala Hassan Dev. (Died) and Others Vs. M/S.The New India Assuran ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order( As per SMT.M. SHREESHA, Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.254/2004 on the file of District Forum, Guntur the complainants preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the case are that the complainant had been taking Medi-claim insurance policy from the year 1998 without any break and the details are as under: 1998 - 621003489800681 1999 621003489901436 2000 621003480000230 2001 -621003480100288 2002 -621003480200332 2003 -621003480300307 On 18-10-2003 the complainant approached Dr.J.Ravindra Kumar with a complaint of fever and stomach pain and the doctor advised the complainant to join a Corporate hospital for treatment suspecting Hepatitis C and thereafter the complainant on 21-10-2003 joined Kamineni Hospitals for better treatment and the complainant submitted that he spent an amount of Rs.78,862-75 ps. towards hospitalization expenses and Rs.3,302-08 towards post hospitalization and submits that the local Medical body had paid an amount of Rs.20,000/- a...