Andhra Pradesh Court July 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Manemma Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD295; 2006(6)ALT144
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel on record.2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in refusing to receive and process the petitioner's application for building permission for construction of building in Premises No. 1-8-369 and 370, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad as it is not accompanied with No Objection Certificate and basing upon the entry in TSLR as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to receive and process the application for building permission without insisting No Objection Certificate and without reference to entry in TSLR and to pass such other suitable orders.3. It is stated that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the house property bearing No. 1-8-369 and 370, admeasuring 70.53 sq. meters situated at Chikkadpally, Hyderabad having inherited from her husband late K. Yadaiah. It is stated that originally one J. Venkata Rao pur...
Commissioner of Collegiate Education and anr. Vs. V. Narayana Reddy an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD492; 2007(1)ALT454
Ramesh Ranganathan, J.1. Aggrieved by the order in W.P. No. 15318 of 1996, dated 9.9.1997, whereby the 1st respondent-writ petitioner was reinstated and given the benefit of service for all purposes including terminal benefits, the present writ appeal is filed.2. The dispute in the writ petition relates to correction of the date of birth of an employee in his service records. The petitioner joined service as a Lecturer in Telugu in the 2nd respondent college on 30.7.1960. He was appointed as an N.C.C. Officer in 1961. While N.C.C. Officers are required to retire at the age of 50 years, the petitioner retired from the said post on 27.2.1994, after two extensions, on reaching the age of 54 years. While his date of birth was recorded in the college Service Register as 1.7.1938, it was recorded as 28.2.1940 in the N.C.C. Register. The petitioner submitted a representation on 3.3.1996 for correction of his date of birth and filed W.P. No. 6245 of 1996 which was disposed of with a direction ...
Vissa Television Network Ltd. Vs. V.V. Ramana Kumar and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD488; [2006(111)FLR765]
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. M/s. Vissa Television Network Limited, has filed these writ petitions assailing the orders passed by the 2nd respondent, namely the Authority under Section 48 of the A.P. Shops and Establishments Act-cum-Assistant Commissioner of Labour-II, Hyderabad, setting aside the orders of termination passed by the petitioner against the 1st respondent-workman and directing the petitioner to reinstate the 1st respondent-workman into service and pay half of the back wages from the date of termination to the date of reinstatement.2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to non-renewal of their licence, the petitioner stopped its operations temporarily, and the licence having been renewed, it started its operations from December, 2004. Even though the 1st respondent has not been attending to duties, he has made a false claim before the 2nd respondent stating that the petitioner had not been paying him salary and had illegally terminated his services in Janu...
Palakurthu Laxmi Ganapathi Rao and Gundu Subhadramma Vs. Manisha Video ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2006
Reported in: 2007(34)PTC33(NULL)
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Introduction: - The plaintiff in O.S. No. 1/89 on the file of District Judge, Krishna at Machilipatnam, is the appellant and defendants 1 and 2 in the said suit are the respondent herein. For the purpose of convenience, the parties would be referred to as the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2. The plaintiff filed the suit under Section 62 of the Copy-right Act, 1957, for declaration that he is the copyright holder of the Telugu feature film Paramanandayya Sishula Katha and also for the relief of mandatory injunction directing defendants 1 and 2 to surrender and deliver the material relating to the film i.e., 3/4th U matic cassettes, 1/2 VHS video cassettes, video gram, Discs, tapes, etc., and also for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, etc., from over exploiting the plaintiffs right over the said picture and also claiming damages of Rs. 1,00,000 and for accounts. The Trial Court recorded the evidence of P.W. 1, D.Ws. 1 and 2, and mark...
T.T. Traders Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD283; 2006(5)ALT331
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is a firm. It is engaged in the business of distribution of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinders being the distributor appointed and licenced by M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), the first respondent herein. Aggrieved by the communication issued to them by the Senior Regional Manager, HPCL, Vijayawada, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. By impugned communication dated 2.6.2005, the first respondent advised the petitioner to handover all consumers catered through extension counter at Renigunta to the newly commissioned dealership of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), namely, M/s. O.V.G. Bharath Gas Agency (a proprietary concern), the third respondent herein. Initially this Court while admitting the writ petition on 15.6.2005 suspended the impugned letter. The third respondent, therefore, moved an application for vacating the interim order. When the said application being W.V.M.P. No. 1908 of 2005, came up ...
Alla Bhavanarayana Vs. Katragadda Vijaya Lakshmi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD758
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The sole defendant in O.S. No. 22 of 1993, on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, is the appellant. The respondent filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 14.8.1983. The trial court decreed the suit, and the appeal preferred by the appellant herein, in the Court of I Additional District Judge, Krishna at Machilipatnam, was dismissed. 2. The respondent filed the suit for specific performance of agreement of sale, with the following averments. The appellant offered to sell a plot of 449 sq. yards in Ward No. 6, Javarupet of Machilipatnam Municipality, at the rate of Rs. 40/- per square yard. A sum of Rs. 3,900/- was paid as advance, on the date of agreement itself. The entire consideration was to be paid within one month from the date of agreement, and the appellant in turn was under obligation, to get the plot measured and to execute a sale deed. The appellant was not ready to get the land measured, but ...
Thota Papi Reddy and Eight ors. Vs. Gudalli Yellaiah Land anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ4409
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J. 1. This Criminal Petition is filed to quash the complaint in P.R.C. No. 9 of 2003 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ramannapet. The allegations, in the complaint filed by the first respondent herein, are that the complainant and accused 1 to 9 belong to the same village of Ch. Ramavaram, and that the complainant belongs to the scheduled caste while the accused belong to the higher caste. On the date of the offence i.e., during Dusserah festival, the complainant, along with other villagers, went to the 'Dasara' bulrush tree for plucking leaves as per their custom. While the complainant was snapping the bulrush leaves, Accused 1 to 9 abused him, asked him not to touch the bulrush tree since he belonged to the Madiga caste and was an untouchable. Accused 1 to 9 prevented the complainant from snapping the bulrush leaves, abused him in a filthy and vulgar language as 'Madiga Lanjakodaka Mammalanu muttukontava', and chased him with axe...
Nallapati Kotamma Vs. Lanka Bhagyalakshmi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD631
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard the counsel.2. This writ petition is filed by Nallapati Kotamma questioning the order dated 21-03-2005 in EOP No. 30 of 2001 on the file of Election Tribunal-cum- Principal Junior Civil Judge, Guntur.3. It is stated that the election for the post of Sarpanch to the Gram Panchayat, Vengalayapalem was held on 17-08-2001 and the said post was reserved for Scheduled Caste woman. The last date for filing of nomination was on 04-08- 2001, the scrutiny of the applications was held on 05-08-2001 and the last date for withdrawal of nomination was on 08-08-2001. The petitioner was one of the contestants along with the respondents 1 to 7 in EOP No. 30 of 2001 to the post of Sarpanch, Vengalayapalem. The first respondent secured maximum number of votes and elected as Sarpanch of Vengalayapalem and the petitioner secured the second highest number of votes. It is an admitted fact that the first respondent gave birth to a male child on 06-09-2001 and hence, she incurred...
United India Insurance Company Limited Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2006
Reported in: II(2007)ACC607; 2007ACJ1735; 2007(1)ALD364; 2007(2)ALT366
B. Prakash Rao, J.1. Heard Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant and Sri K. Venkatesh Gupta, learned Counsel, appearing for the respondent-claimants.2. This appeal is at the instance of the insurance-company aggrieved against the order and decree in M.V.O.P. No. 293 of 2001 dated 26-11-2002 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kurnool, allowing the petition filed under Sections 140 and 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act claiming compensation, on account of death of the deceased in a motor vehicle accident.3. The few facts, which are necessary for disposal of this appeal, are that the claimants are the children of deceased Kurva Yejji Bojjanna. In an accident that occurred on 08-05-1999 at about 8-30 pm, the said Bojjanna while getting down from the lorry of respondent No. 4, who is the owner of the vehicle, at Sri Satya Sai School, Kollapur, came under the same lorry due to its rash and negligent driving, due to which he sustained se...
A. Nazeemunnisa Vs. Rasool Bee and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD677
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Ramesh, the learned Counsel representing Sri S.V. Bhatt.2. The revision petitioner A, Nazeemunnisa aggrieved by the order made in LA. No. 443 of 2004 in O.S. No. 4 of 1999 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chittoor, filed the present civil revision petition.3. The revision petitioner-the third defendant in the said suit filed an application LA. No. 443 of 2004 in O.S. No. 4 of 1999 under Order XXVI Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure praying to examine the petitioner - Defendant No. 3 in cross-examination by appointing an Advocate Commissioner in the residence of the petitioner. The learned Judge recorded certain reasons and ultimately dismissed the application. Aggrieved by the same, the present C.R.P. is preferred,4. The stand taken by the revision petitioner is that she being a Muslim lady and observing Parda, she could not be exposed to public and hence, such relief had been prayed for in the said application. The same was resisted b...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »