Andhra Pradesh Court June 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pinnaboyina Chittamma and ors. Vs. B. Narasingarao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
Reported in: 2003ACJ1531; 2002(6)ALT723
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. The appeal is filed by the claimants challenging the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, in O.P. No. 23 of 1986 dated 30-10-1991.2. An important issue that arises for consideration in this appeal is the interpretation of the expression 'public place.'3. One Mr. Gangaiah was the driver of the lorry bearing No. ABK 8035. On 28-8-1985, the lorry went to the premises of Coromandel Fertilisers Limited, Visakhapatnam to load Gypsum. The lorry entered into the premises of the factory after obtaining necessary permission. It was parked at the appropriate parking place and the driver was with the vehicle. While so, a cleaner of another lorry bearing No. ATV 3438 while taking reverse of the vehicle dashed against Gangaiah on account of which he died. Consequently, the legal representatives of the deceased laid a claim for compensation. The Tribunal found that the accident had not taken place in a public place ...
N. Nageswara Rao Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by General Manager, (Wo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
Reported in: 2004(2)ALT208
ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J. 1. The petitioner, who is working as Class-4 employee of the Railways, was granted permission for cultivation of Railway lands under Grow More Food Scheme for the year 1994-95. According to the petitioner, though the licence was granted in the year January, 1996, but the possession of the same was given in January, 1998. The same was not fit for immediate cultivation. The petitioner after spending huge amounts started cultivation in the year 1998. While so, the respondents by order dated 20-2-1996 have insisted upon for payment of revised licence fees said to have been revised from 1-4-1995. The petitioner made representations on 23-10-1997 and also on 2-11-1998 but still the authorities insisted for the payment of revised rates of licence fees with effect from 1-4-1995. As the petitioner left with no other alternative paid the revised license fees for the years 1995-1996. 1996-1997. 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 under protest pending disposal of the representations d...
S. Ramaswamy and ors. Vs. Special Court Constituted Under the A.P. Lan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALT11
ORDERDalava Subramanyam, J.1. The petitioners in W.P.No. 21588 of 1998, who are the applicants in L.G.C.No. 113 of 1995 on the file of the Special Court constituted under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, Hyderabad (for short 'the Special Court'), filed the writ challenging the judgment of the Special Court in partly allowing the application declaring the right and title of the applicants to an extent of 253 sq. yards in plot No. 29 in S.No. 37 shown in Ex. C-3 and declaring the respondents as land grabbers to that extent and dismissing the application for the rest of the claim.2. The writ petitioners in W.P.No. 25869 of 2000, who are the respondents 1, 4 to 6 in L.G.C.No. 113 of 1995, filed the writ aggrieved against the judgment in L.G.C-No. 113 of 1995 declaring them as the land grabbers to an extent of 253 sq. yards in plot No. 29 in S.No. 37 as shown in Ex. C-3.3. Since both the writ petitions are filed aggrieved by the judgment and decree in L.G.C.No. 113 of 1995, both ...
M.B. Ratnam and ors. Vs. N. Ashok Kumar and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD764; 2003(2)ALT17
1. This appeal is filed by respondents in I.A. No. 96 of 2002 in O.S. No. 55 of 2002 on the file of Vacation Civil Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar. After summer vacation was over, the said suit was made over to Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rangaredy District at L.B. Nagar for disposal and it is now pending as O.S. No. 415 of 2002 on the file of the said Principal Senior Civil Judge. 2. The respondents - plaintiffs filed the suit seeking a decree for perpetual injunction against the appellants. They also filed a petition under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C., in I.A. No. 96 of 2002 requesting the trial court to grant temporary injunction order restraining the appellants herein from interfering with their peaceful possession of suit schedule lands. On 13.5.2002 after hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiffs and perusing the documents filed along with the plaint, the learned Vacation Civil Judge dispensed with prior notice to the appellants herein and granted ad-interim i...
R. Komaraiah Vs. Special Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD579; 2003(2)ALT422
S.R. Nayak, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order-dated 28-4-2000 made in LGC No.85 of 1996 on the file of the Special Court constituted under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (for short, 'the Act'). The writ petitioner is the respondent in the LGC.2. The 2nd respondent herein viz., Kasula Raghumani, filed the above LGC in the Special Court for declaration of title and for recovery of possession of the land to an extent of 1102 sq. yards equivalent to 922 sq. meters comprised in Sy. No.63/2 of Sankeswar Bazaar, Saidabad village and Mandal of Hyderabad (the then Channinar Mandal), (hereinafter referred to as 'the schedule land'), by declaring the writ petitioner as the land grabber and to punish him under the provisions of the Act. The said application filed by the 2nd respondent herein was allowed by the Special Court holding that the petitioner herein is a land grabber within the meaning of the Act and directing him to vacate the schedule land within a period...
B.V. Narayana Rao Vs. Indian Bank, Madras
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD106
S.R. Nayak, J.1. The unsuccessful petitioner-appellant being aggrieved by the order of the learned single judge dated 2-9-1988 in Writ Petition No.6933 of 1988 has filed this, writ appeal.2. In the writ petition, the petitioner sought for a writ of certiorari for quashing the proceedings dated 4-8-1986 of the Deputy General Manager (Personnel) and the proceedings No. HIM:GENL:87, dated 20-10-1987 of the Chief Manager, Himayatnagar, Office of Indian Bank,Hyderabad and for a consequential direction to the respondent to promote the petitioner to the Officer Grade (J.M. Scale-1) post with retrospective effect i.e., from 8-5-1974 and to grant all the consequential benefits flowing from such promotion.3. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition be summarized briefly as under: The petitioner while working as Clerk in the establishment of the respondent bank came under zone of consideration for promotion to the post of Officer Grade (J.M.Scale-I) on 8-5-1974. But, his case was not ...
G.S. Venkata Ramana and ors. Vs. General Manager, South Central Railwa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD264; 2002(5)ALT600
Bilal Nazki, J. 1. This is a Writ petition filed by the petitioners who have filed an O.A being O.A.No.666 of 2002 before the Tribunal challenging the memorandum issued by South Central Railways dated 30th May, 2002. Along with the O.A an application for interim stay was filed. The Tribunal has passed the following order:'Heard the Counsel on both sides. We consider it necessary to get a reply statement from the respondents. The learned Counsel for the applicant sought for an interim direction in the matter. We are not inclined to grant any interim direction in this matter.'2. Before coming to the controversy it is necessary to refer to certain material facts. The petitioners were appointed after a notification for filling up of certain vacancies. There were 90 vacancies of Junior clerks-cum-Typists in the scale of Rs.950-1500 in the South Central Railway zone. It was stipulated in the notification that the selection would be made on the basis of written examination and interview, skil...
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Guntur Dignumate Neti Kotala Dharam Chaliv ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: 2003(3)ALD349; 2003(4)ALT376
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the District Collector, Guntur first defendant in O.S. No. 314 of 1982 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Guntur is the appellant. Respondents 1 and 2 in the appeal are the plaintiffs in the said suit and the 3rd respondent Guntur Municipality represented by its Commissioner is the 2nd defendant in the said suit. 2. Respondents 1 and 2 herein, the plaintiffs in the suit had instituted OS.No. 314 of 1982 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Guntur praying for the relief for possession of the suit schedule property free from obstruction from the appellant and the 3rd respondent in the appeal the defendants in the suit and also for damages for demolition of the building in the said site in a sum of Rs. 98,000/- and for interest on the said amount at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realisation and for the costs of the suit. 3. The respondents 1 and 2 in the appeal th...
A. Rama Murthy Vs. the A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corp.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD112; 2002(6)ALT138
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. The petitioner was an employee of the Respondent-Corporation. After his initial recruitment, he earned number of promotions and ultimately he was promoted to the post of Assistant Regional Manager on 22-11-79.2. While he was working in that capacity at Karimnagar, he was issued a charge memo dated 13-2-90 by the Deputy General Manager (Finance II), who has been appointed as the Enquiry Officer. The only charge that was framed in the charge memo was that the petitioner has collected a sum of Rs.11,447/- on 7-9-1989 from M/s.Sri Charan Enterprises towards balance of Cost and Maintenance Charges of a plot, without specific orders from the Managing Director and in spite of the fact that the allotment of the plot in favour of the said Entrepreneur was cancelled, a decree of eviction was obtained by the Corporation against him in OS.No.44/88 and execution proceedings were in progress. The petitioner was required to submit his explanation within 15 days from the...
Vattumalli Narayana Rao Vs. Medrarapu Krishna Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2002
Reported in: AIR2003AP46; 2002(5)ALD588; 2002(6)ALT528
P.S. Narayana, J.1. The 3rd defendant in OS No.78/82 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Bhimavaram is the appellant. The 1 st respondent in the appeal is the plaintiff. Defendants 2, 4 and 5 were impleaded as respondents 2 to 5 in the present appeal and the appeal was dismissed for default as against those respondents/defendants.2. The 1st respondent/plaintiff filed the above suit for recovery of Rs.20,584/-with costs and subsequent interest as against the 1st defendant firm and also the partners on the strength of a promissory note dated 21-9-1979 executed by the 1st defendant firm, represented by its managing Partner, shown as 2nd defendant in the suit.3. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the original suit.4. The 1st respondent/plaintiff had pleaded as follows:The 1st defendant is the firm while defendants 2 to 5 are its partners, doing rice and flour mill contract business under the name and style of the 1st defendant. The 2nd defendant is acti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »