Andhra Pradesh Court November 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Railways, Nalgonda ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD745
1. The appellant in this appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short 'the Act'} is the Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer), Railways, Nalgonda The Judgment and decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Nalgonda in O.P.No.114 of 1983 dated 30-4-1985 is challenged in A.S.No.2793 of 1985.2. The grounds taken by the appellant in A. S.No. 2793/1985 are briefly as follows :(1) That the enhancement of compensation to Rs.10/- per square yard from the rate of compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer ranging from Rs. 1,850/- to Rs.2,775/- per acre was abnormal and unreasonable; (2) Reliance placed on Exs.A2 to A4 which were broughtinto existence subsequent to Section 4(1) notification was notlegal and proper; (3) The lower Court ought to have seen that Exs. A2 to A4 beside being the got up documents were also not comparable sales having regard to the fact that the same were consisting of small extents of land; (4) A grievance is also made in the...
G.Lakshmi Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal A.P., Hyd. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD1; 1997(6)ALT511
ORDERV. Bhaskar Rao, J.1. This is a writ petition filed assailing the order of the first respondent/State Transport Appellate Tribunal dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner.2. The facts of the case are : The petitioner filed application for grant of pucca permit for plying the bus on the route Siddipet town to Marpadga via Ponnala. The 2nd respondent/Regional Transport Authority rejected the application of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner was already granted two permits of town service routes in the district of Medak and she was running the services on the said route and opportunity should be given to unemployed person instead of giving another permit to the petitioner. The 2nd respondent accordingly granted permit to one Janga Reddy. Against that order, the petitioner filed appeal before the first respondent and the first respondent rejected the appeal on the same grounds. Against the same, the present writ petition is filed.3. The learned Counsel for the petit...
P. Katama Reddy Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantpur and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD136; 1997(6)ALT548
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. Whether women-reservation can be provided in the matter of allotment of fair-price shops and if so what should be the extent of such reservation and as to whether the said reservation can be 100% - are the vital questions for consideration in this batch of writ petitions.2. Fair price shops have been set-up by promulgating an order titled 'Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Commodities (Regulation and Distribution by Card System) Order, 1973 in exercise of the powers contained under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. At the inception, no reservation was stipulated, but preference was being given to the Co-operative Societies to run the fair-price shops. Class reservations grouped on caste basis were introduced in the year 1987 for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes at 15% and 6% respectively. 3% reservation was also provided to physically handicapped. Coming to 1988, there was a little change in the policy because of acute unemployment problem for ...
K. Gundacchar Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-1997
Reported in: 1998(3)ALD196
ORDER1. All the three writ petitions raise common questions of law and hence they are disposed of by a common order.2. In these writ petitions, constitutional validity of Section 78-B(i) of A.P. Education Act, 1982 and Rule 2 Part 'A' of the A.P.Aided Degree Oriental and Junior Colleges Staff Pension Rules, 1993 issued in G.O. Ms. No.2, Education (CE-II) Department, dated 5-1-1994 are assailed and sought for consequential direction to fix the pension/family pension of the petitioners by applying A.P. Revised Pension Rules, 1980 with effect from the dates of their respective retirements.3. Writ Petition No. 8722/1996 was filed by the Affiliated College Teachers Association and Teachers working in the Private Aided Colleges. The widow of the deceased pensioner is also one of the petitioners. The petitioners worked in various private aided colleges and they retired from service on attaining the age of 58 years. It is necessary to trace the previous events for the introduction of pension s...
Kadavakollu Ramulu and anr. Vs. Commissioner for Co-operation and Regi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-27-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD460; 1998(1)ALT617
1. The material facts for the purpose of this writ petition are narrated as follows : 2. Elections to the Managing Committee of Mandapakala Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited, R.No.H.5622, hereinafter referred to as'Society' were held on 26th July, 1995. 4th Respondent was elected directly as President and 12 others were elected as members of the committee. The petitioners herein were also elected as members of the committee. After the constitution of the committee the 4th respondent issued a notice on 12-2-96 to the petitioners which according to them was received on 19-2-96. In this notice it was alleged that the petitioners have failed to attend four consecutive committee meetings held on 30-9-95,29-11-95,30-11-95 and 20-12-95 and therefore they had acquired disqualification to continue as members of the committee in terms of Section 21B of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, hereinafter referred as 'Act'. By this notice, an explanation was called from ...
Jamedar Bhavani Singh Vs. Budathi Balaih and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-27-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD500; 1998(1)ALT551
ORDER1. Heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties.2. The petitioner is seeking an order in this civil miscellaneous petition that the main civil revision petition No.2421/94 be permitted to be converted into a writ petition in view of the fact that in Mathan Sangaiah v. Pateal Eswarappa, 1997 (2) APLJ 494, it is held that revision does not lie, to this Court from the order of the prescribed authority under Section 24 of the A. P. (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 read with Section 28 thereof It is further observed in the concluding part of Para 4 as under:'...At this stage the learned Counsel for the petitioners cited a decision reported in G V. Narasimha Reddy v. Syed Aktar Ali, 1988 (2) ALT 136 and strongly contended that a revision against an order under Section 24 is very well maintainable in this Court. I am not inclined to agree with the reasoning that is given in the said decision. As already held by me, the intent of the Legislature is otherwise. It intends to...
Mc Dowell and Co. Ltd., Nacharam Vs. Commissioner of Excise, Ap and or ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-27-1997
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD398; 1998(4)ALT426
ORDERD. Redeppa Reddi, J. 1. Thepetitioner is a manufacturer of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, having its factory at Hyderabad. It has filed this writ petition to declare the action of the respondents, claiming a sum of Rs.96,480/- towards export fee under the impugned proceedings as illegal and arbitrary.2. The relevant facts that led to the filing of this petition may be stated thus: The Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation obtained fourteen import permits on 12-3-1992 from the Commissioner of Excise, Tamilnadu, for importing Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) from the petitioner. The permits so obtained were valid upto 10-4-1992. On the strength of the said permits, the petitioner applied for 14 export permits to the 1st respondent, namely, Commissioner of Excise, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, by paying the necessary export fee of Rs.96,480/-on21-3-1992. Thereupon, the 1st respondent granted 14 export permits on 8-4-1992 permitting the petitioner to export the permitted quantity of liquor...
M. Sadhiqunnisa Begum and anr. Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, South Di ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-26-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD175; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)586
ORDER1. The petitioners in the instant writ petition pray for issuance of an appropriate writ, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent in seizing Ambassador Car bearing No.AAV-6929 under Rc.No.1/MP/II/92-93 dated 9-4-1992 as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners also pray for a declaration that the proceedings No.2371/92/HB, dated 21-4-1992 on the file of the first respondent as null and void.Relevant Facts :2. The petitioners are the owners of the Ambassador Car Bearing No. AAV-6929 (for short 'the Car') of 1969 model. The petitioners are stated to have purchased the said car for a sum of Rs.30,000.00/- in the year 1991 for the purposes of plying the same on hire. On 8-4-1992, the Car is said to have been hired by a marriage party from Warangal to Khamrnam. It was seized by the second respondent herein on the ground that the car was used as escort for a lorry which is alleged to have been transporting illegal timber. The vehicl...
S.D.A. Karim Vs. Engineer-in-chief, Public Health Department, Hyderaba ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-26-1997
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD213
1. This Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is invoked by the petitioner purported to be in public interest. He prays for issuance of an appropriate writ particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents herein in modifying the scheme of Water Supply to the 'fifthrespondent- Municipality through PSC pipes instead of RCC pipes by inviting tenders through Bid Notice No. 765/NRT/WSS/ PWGM/RI/D4/97-1 Dt. 18-8-1997 as illegal and void. The petitioner consequently prays for issuance of an appropriate direction directing the respondents to implement the Water-supply scheme as per the earlier estimates furnished.2. The petitioner is a retired Government Employee and a resident of Narsaraopet town. He is aggrieved by the action of the respondents i and 2 herein in awarding the contract of the work relating to supply of water to the residents of Narasaraopet Municipality. The petitioner alleges abuse of official st...
Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Secretary, Home (Prisons) Dep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-26-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD(Cri)495; 1998(2)ALT261
ORDERSyed Shah Mohammed Quadri, A.C.J.1. These two writ appeals raise the question of validity of the direction of the learned single Judge directing that the convict be sent to Borstal School under Section 10 (A) of the Borstal School Act.2. Having regard to the contentions raised by the learned Government Pleader for Home, it will not be necessary to refer to the facts of the case. However, we prefer to note that the contentions are covered by the judgments of the Division Bench of this Court. Firstly, it is contended that at the time of issuing direction by the learned single Judge, the adolescent convict should have atleast a minimum period of two years for reformation in the Borstal School. A Division Bench of this Court in State of A.P. v. Komalla Krishnaiah, : 1992(1)ALT644 (D.B.) dealing with similar submission observed as follows;'We are in full agreement with the following view expressed by the learned Judge how the available limited period will have the desired effect of ref...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »