Andhra Pradesh Court April 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Sulakshana Bai Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by the Secretary to Governmen ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)ALT498
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. The question for consideration in this writ petition is, whether the land certified to be agricultural land on the date of commencement 6f the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short, 'the Act'), would continue to retain its character as agricultural land even after it was divided into house sites and sold? The petitioner was the pattadar in respect of agricultural lands covered by Sy Nos. 63/71 and 72 of Karmanghat village within the urban agglomeration of Hyderabad. On the coming into force of the Act, she and her four daughters and one son filed separate declarations Under Section 6(1) of the Act in respect of the lands, before the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad, (for short, 'the Special Officer'). As the petitioner had a doubt regarding the nature of the land, she obtained a certificate from the Special Officer Under Section 2(o) of the Act read with the clarification issued by the Government in their memo...
Dr. C. Jayasree Vs. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)ALT898
Y. Bhasker Rao, J.1. This writ appeal is filed aggrieved by the orders passed in W.P.No. 20552 of 1993 dated 29-3-1994. The facts of the case are that the respondent-Corporation, who is the owner and possessor of the Commercial Complex situate at Kummarguda, Secunderabad, proposed to sell the said commercial complex as it could not complete the project and in that connection issued wide publicity in the newspapers on three occasions and also wrote letters to various builders and Associations in all the States. In response to the third advertisement and also the letters written by the respondent, nine persons submitted applications for purchase of the tender schedules but only six persons took the tender schedules. However, when the tenders were opened, the appellant-petitioner was only the person who filed the tender quoting the price of Rs. 2.91 crores. Thereupon, the respondent-Corporation sought for confirmation from the appellant-petitioner about her willingness to deposit the enti...
Shalimar Chemical Works Limited Vs. the Agricultural Market Committee
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT256
M.N. Rao, J.1. This appeal, filed Under Section 12-G of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce & Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 (for short 'the Act'), is from the revisional order dated 8-11-1993 passed by the Director of Marketing, Government of Andhra Pradesh Under Section 12-F of the Act in R.P.No. 23 of 1993 affirming the appellate order of the Joint Director of Marketing in Appeal No. l of 1989 dated 11-12-1989 upholding the assessment order dated 2-3-989 passed by the Assistant Secretary, Hyderabad Agricultural Market Committee in regard to levy of market fees for the period from 1-4-1985 to 31-12-1988 in respect of the appellant. The turnover involved is Rs. 23,72,16,997.90 and the market fee liable to be paid was: at the rate of one percent of the turnover.2. Common orders were passed by the appellate as well as the revisional authorities in respect of the appellant herein and another trader - M/s. Rajathgiri Oil lndustries-whose appeal-CMA No. 1218 of l995-was also heard along...
S. Sulakshna Bai Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Secretary to Government Urb ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT557
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. The question for consideration in this writ petition is whether the land certified to be agricultural land on the date of commencement of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short, the Act'), would continue to retain its character as agricultural land even after it was divided into house sites and sold? The petitioner was the pattadar in respect of agricultural lands covered by Sy.Nos. 63, 71 and 72 of Karmanghat village within the urban agglomeration of Hyderabad. On the coming into force the Act, she and her four daughters and one son filed separate declarations under Section 6(1) of the Act in respect of the lands, before the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad, (for short, 'the Special Officer'). As the petitioner had a doubt regarding the nature of the land, she obtained a certificate from the Special Officer under Section 2(o) of the Act read with the clarification issued by the Government in their memo No....
Master A. Sridhar, Minor Being Rep. by His Guardian, A. Venkateswarlu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT890
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. This C.R.P. is filed against the Order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, in I.A.No. 557/1995 in O.P.No. 968/1992. O.P. No. 968/1992 is a petition filed by the 1st respondent herein for grant of succession certificate in her favour. Another suit was filed in the year 1992 by the respondents for declaration of the status of the respondents as legally wedded wife and daughter of late Narayana Rao respectively and for partition and separate possession of the proper ties of late Narayan Rao. The said suitwas transferred to the Court of the Additional Chief Judge and on such transfer, the suit was assigned the number O.S.No. 224/1994. However, the said suit was made over to the Family Court, Hyderabad after the Family Courts Act was brought into force in the city of Hyderabad. The said suit is pending in the Family Court. While so, the respondent in the O.P. (Petitioner here in) who is the son of late Sri Narayana Rao filed an I. ...
A. Srinath and Others Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-1996
Reported in: AIR1996AP309; 1996(2)ALT893; (1997)ILLJ255AP
ORDERP.S. Mishra, C.J.1. The instant petition to review the final judgment in Writ Appeal No. 903 of 1994 has been occasioned for the reason that the Bench consisting of Lingaraja Rath, J. and D. Reddeppa Reddi has ordered that in view of the judgment of this Court in Kum. K. Pushpa Leela v. Labour Court, Guntur, (1991) 3 Andh LT 22 (Notes on Recent Cases) and G. Padma v. Dr. B. Vijaya Lakshmi, (1994) 3 Andh LT 318, it has to be heard by Reddeppa Reddi, J. alone because A. Lakshmana Rao, J., has since demitted the office and learned counsel for the petitioners has circulated a letter stating that the matter should not be heard by Reddeppa Reddi, J., as he was the Standing Counsel for the respondents before his elevation as a Judge. No objection, however, was taken when the writ appeal was taken up for hearing that Reddeppa Reddi, J., should not hear the appeal. The order that the matter should be heard by Reddeppa Reddi, J., was passed by a Bench, of which Reddeppa Reddi, J., was a Mem...
Nallapareddy Janardhana Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)ALD90; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)124; 1996CriLJ3034
1. This appeal is filed against the Judgment and sentence passed in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1992 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Chittoor. On a private complaint filed by the one Dandu Raja Reddy under section 302 IPC, the II Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate. Madanapalle, took the case on file and subsequently Sessions Case No. 28 of 1992 was registered. The Inspector of Police, Madanapalle, filed charge sheet in Crime No. 59 of 1983 of B. Kothakota Police Station under section 304A and 379 IPC and Section 39 of Electricity Act in C.C. No. 92 of 1984. These two cases arise on the same incident. The Calender Case is transferred to be tried along with Sessions Case No. 28/92, and after its transfer, it was registered as C.C. No. 1/92. 2. The case of the prosecution in C.C. No. 1 of 1992 is as follows : The accused is a resident of Gollapalle. Late Govinda Reddy is also resident of same village. On 4-12-1983 at about 9.30 a.m. Govenda Reddy went to Government Channel to take water...
Yandrapu Venkataramana Vs. Yandrapu Surya Prabhavathi and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALD841; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)633; 1996(2)ALT271; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)371; 1997CriLJ710
ORDER1. This petition is filed to quash the order passed by the II Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry in Cr.M.P. No. 2890/93 in M.C. No. 30/91 and also the order passed by the I Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry, in Cri.R.P. No. 33/1995, confirming the order of the trial Court. 2. The 1st respondent herein filed M.C. No. 30/91 on the file of the II Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmindry, for maintenance under Section 125(1), Cr.P.C. claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month. That petition was allowed granting maintenance at the rate of Rs. 400/- p.m. The petitioner herein filed Cr.M.P. No. 2890/93 to cancel the ex parte order dated 20-4-1994 in M.C. No. 30/91 but the same was dismissed on 11-11-1994. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner herein had preferred criminal revision petition No. 33/1995 on the file of the I Addl. District and Session Judge, Rajahmindry. The learned Sessions Judge, after considering the merits of the c...
Syed Mohammad Yahya Quadri (Died) Per L.Rs. Vs. the District Collector ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)ALT793
B.K. Somasekhara, J.1. The matter was heard once and an order was passed on 1-4-1994 setting aside the findings given on issues 1 and 2 by the trial Court and the matter was remitted back for giving fresh findings on issues 1 and 2 by giving sufficient opportunity to both the sides to lead additional evidence on the said issues and the appeal was kept pending till then. Now that the learned trial Judge has submitted his findings on the said issues again, as directed by this Court, in his report dated 22-11-1995, the matter is being heard again to dispose of the appeal on merits.2. This is a plaintiff's appeal. His suit O.S.No. 79 of 1978 was dismissed by the learned Sub-Judge, Nalgonda by his judgment and decree dated 24-3-1982. The respondents in the appeal were the defendants in the suit.3. The plaintiff filed the suit for return of the plaint schedule property by delivering vacant possession of the same by defendant No. 1, who is the District, Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda....
Y. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. N. Pola Reddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT322
ORDERRamesh Madhav Bapat, J.1. The petitioner herein was the original defendant in O.S. No. 106/1987 filed by the plaintiffs-respondents against the petitioner herein in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Gudur.2. It appears from record that parties to this suit led evidence and the matter was posted for judgment. At that stage, the plaintiffs-respondents filed I.A. No. 185/1995 with a request to allow them to carry out certain amendment which was proposed in the aforesaid I. A. On hearing both sides, it appears, the said I.A. was allowed. Against the said Order, the present revision petition is preferred by the defendant-petitioner.3. In order to appreciate the real controversy between the parties, it is necessary to narrate a few facts.4. It appears from record that the plaintiffs-respondents filed a suit against the defendant for recovery of Rs. 60,390.05 due under a promissory note. The plaintiffs in the suit have pleaded that the defendant was working in the P & T Department at v...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »