Andhra Pradesh Court March 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. G. Renuka Vs. M. Papa Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-31-1994
Reported in: AIR1995AP130; 1994(2)ALT535; I(1995)DMC270
1. These two appeals arise out of the common judgment passed in A.S. Nos.24 and 15 of 1987 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Warangal.2. In both the appeals, plaintiff is the appellant. Second Appeal No. 178 of 1988 arises out of the judgment in A.S. No. 24 of 1985 which was filed against the judgment in O.S. No. 229 of 1981 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Warangal, by the respondent herein. Second Appeal No. 260 of 1988 was filed against the judgment in A.S. No. 15 of 1987 by the appellant-plaintiff against that part of the judgment in O.S. No. 229 of 1991 refusing to grant interest to the plaintiff.3. The facts in brief are that the appellant filed the suit O.S. No. 229 of 1981 against husband and her father-in-law for recovery of Rs. 17,150/- which is made up for Rupees 15,000/- principal and Rs.2,150/- interest, being the amount of dowry paid by her father before her marriage with the 1st defendant (who died during the pendency of the suit.) The father ...
Pubi Satyanarayana Alias Satteyya Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-31-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT172; 1995CriLJ1738
1. This is an appeal filed by the sole accused in S.C. No. 185 of 1991 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Eluru, West Godavari. The accused is the sister's son of the deceased, who is a resident of Pasalapudi village in East Godavari district. The accused went away to an Arab country two years back. On 3-4-1991, the accused returned from the Arab country and went to the house of Raghavulu, the relation of the accused. The family of Raghavulu told something against the family of the deceased and the accused abused the family of the deceased on that night. The wife of the accused was sick and was not able to lead family life. Therefore, he wanted to marry somebody. On 4-4-1991 at about 10 a.m., the accused came to the house of the deceased and asked why they informed his wife and fater-in-law about the proposed second marriage and threatened to kill the deceased and his wife. By saying so, he took out the vegetable cutter belonging to the deceased and hacked the wife of the de...
Mrs. K. Padmalatha, Advocate and ors. Vs. Govt. of India, Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-31-1994
Reported in: 1994(3)ALT159
ORDER1. This batch of writ petitions is the third attempt by the Members of the legal profession to enter Non-OYT Special Category specified under the Telephone Amendment Rules, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules')- For efficient functioning of the scheme to provide facility of telephone speedily, the applicants are classified by the respondents in two categories: (1) OYT (own your telephone) category; and (2) Non-OYT category. Non-OYT category is sub-divided into two categories; (a) Non-OYT Special Category and (b) NonOYT General Category. The allotment of telephones among these categories, is as follows:(i) OYT........40%(ii) Non-OYT Spl.......20%(iii) Non-OYT Gen.....20%2. In this batch of writ petitions we are concerned with Non-OYT Special Category. Rule 2.4 of the Rules which are non-statutory, enumerates various persons which are included in this category. This rule has been amended from time to time adding further categories by executive instructions.3. The Members of ...
indla Subba Reddy Vs. the Govt. of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, Agricu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-31-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT565
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. The main averment in the writ petition is that the impugned G.O.Ms.No. 12, Agriculture & Co-operation (Mrtg: 1) dated 21-1-1994 was issued constituting the Agricultural Market Committee for Cuddapah by the Government without independent application of mind, but only on tine basis of the list submitted by four Members of Legislative Assembly with mutual consent. I have passed the orders of status quo on 31-1-1994 as it was stated that the oath taking ceremony was on 2-2-1994. Now, Mr. E. Ella Reddy, the learned Counsel for the 4th respondent has brought to my notice that there is no oath taking ceremony under the statute or the rules framed thereunder. As such, it is a charge-taking ceremony. There is lot of dispute raised by Mr. S. Ramachander Rao as to whether the charge was taken over on 31-1-1994 as stated by the Government and the 4th respondent. While the stand of Mr. S. Ramachandra Rao is that the charge was to be taken over on 2nd February, 1994, Mr...
Nellimarla Jute Mills Karmika Sangham Vs. State of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT223; (1995)ILLJ507AP
ORDERS. Parvatha Rao, J. 1. The petitioner is Nellimarla Jute Mills Karmika Sangham, represented by its General Secretary, K. Suresh. The petitioner prays for an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents i.e., respondents 1 to 4, who are the original respondents in the writ petition, 'to allow the workers to work in the factory without insisting upon giving personal undertaking by the workers' etc. 2. Along with the writ petition, the petitioner also filed W.P.M.P. No. 22296 of 1993 for an interim direction directing respondents 1 to 4 'to allow the workers to work in the factory without insisting upon giving personal undertaking by the workers, pending the writ petition and to pass such other order' etc. 3. The writ petition was presented on November 22, 1993. It was admitted on November 24, 1993 and on the same day in W.P.M.P. No. 22296 of 1993 this Court granted interim direction as prayed for until further or...
Dr. C. Jayasree Vs. Commissioner, M.C.H.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-29-1994
Reported in: AIR1994AP312
ORDER1. The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, respondent in this writ petition, is the owner and possessor of the Commercial Complex situate at Kummarguda, Secunderabad. In 1986, the respondent proposed to construct a commercial complex at Kummarguda, Secunderabad. However, the respondent-Corporation, for want of funds, could not complete the construction and also felt that it was not a profitable project and, therefore, took a decision to sell the property. Accordingly, the respondent obtained permission from the State Government on 18-3-1992, for selling the property. A wide publicity was made in four newspapers on three occasions, in the months of March, April and May 1992 by the respondent about the intention of the respondent-Corporation to sell the property. No person came forward to file tenders for purchase of the premises as the upset price fixed at 2.8 crores rupees was considered as very high. Thereafter, the respondent-Corporation wrote letters to various builders and ass...
Bala Nagaiah and anr. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-1994
Reported in: 1994(1)ALT702
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. The two petitioners herein had been serving the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) for nearly two decades as drivers. As there are hazards in every employment/profession, the post of the drivers in A. P. S. R. T. C. are no exception. Because of the constant driving and the strain involved, the petitioners and the like develop defective eye vision. I myself dealt with several cases sitting in admission and also in final hearing. As this type of cases are occurring time and again, I deem it reasonable to adjudicate these two matters comprehensively so that it can act as a guiding formula for appointment of such drivers who sustain defective eye-vision or other medical problems on account of long driving years. The criterion being adopted by A. P. S. R. T. C. now is to allocate 10% of the quota for appointment as cleaners from among drivers who are declared medically unfit while working as drivers. But, again this is made division-wise. ...
T.B. Ch. V. Ramanaiah and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, H ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-1994
Reported in: [1994]95STC296(AP)
M.N. Rao, J.1. This appeal, under section 23 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short 'the Act'), is directed against an order passed by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes dated January 7, 1986, in exercise of his revisional jurisdiction under section 20(1) of the Act setting aside the order of the appellate authority - the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes - dated October 13, 1981, in Appeal No. 90/81-82 in respect of turnover of Rs. 1,64,790. The appellant - M/s. T. B. Ch. V. Ramanaiah & Sons of Kothavalasa - is a registered dealer under the Act carrying on business in groundnut oil, groundnut cake, gingelly oil and gingelly cake. The premises of the appellant was inspected on May 1, 1979 by the Commercial Tax Officer and the inspection disclosed that there was an excess of 38 bags of groundnut cake and 18 bags of gingelly cake. The Commercial Tax Officer estimated the suppressed turnover relatable to the groundnut oil and gingelly oil at Rs. 54,930 and le...
P.P. Mastanrao and ors. Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, F ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT197
ORDERB.S. Raikote, J.1. Four petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not extending the special pay of Rs. 100-00 to the petitioners having extended the same to the equivalent posts viz., Mandal Revenue Officers as per G.O.Ms.No. 74 dated 25-3-1987is arbitrary, illegal, unjust and discriminatory. There is a further prayer that they should also be awarded the special pay of Rs. 100-00 on par with the Mandal Revenue Officer (hereinafter referred to as 'the M.R. Os.') with effect from 25-3-1987.2. First petitioner is working as Additional Head Clerk, I Additional Distict Court, Guntur. Second petitioner is working as Central Nazar in the District Court, Guntur. The third petitioner is working as Head Clerk in the District Court, Guntur and the fourth petitioner is working as Sheristadar, Sub-Court, Guntur. The petitioners have got common grievance and according to the case of the petitioners they are...
N. Brahmaiah and ors. Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, Foo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT633
M.N. Rao, J.1. These two writ appeals arise out of Writ Petition Nos. 15660 of 1992 and 1102 of 1993 which were disposed of along with certain other writ petitions, by a learned Single Judge of this Court by a common order dated 18th January, 1994. What was essentially at issue before the learned Single Judge was the method of appointments to the common cadre of Class-II Officers in the A.P. State Co- operative Bank. Section 116-A of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 contemplates constitution of common cadres of posts in certain societies. Clause (a) which is relevant is in the following terms:'116-A: (1) Notwithstanding anything in this Act, the Registrar shall have power to constitute a common cadre for the following posts, namely:(a) Co-operative Banks (i) General Managers of Co-operative Central Banks and Deputy General Managers of Appex Bank, (ii) Deputy Managers of Co-operative Central Banks and Assistant General Managers of Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank.'We are ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »