Allahabad Court July 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Trade Tax Vs. Nervy Lock Company
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-04-2005
Reported in: (2007)8VST683(All)
Prakash Krishna, J.1. The present revision is directed against the order passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Aligarh.2. The dealer-opposite party carried on the business of manufacture and sale of bicycle locks. Its turnover for the assessment year 1990-91 (Central) was accepted by the assessing officer. However, in respect of certain sales the dealer-opposite party claimed concessional rate of tax, at the rate of four per cent on the supposition that it would be filing the requisite form C subsequently. It failed to submit form C in respect of sale of Rs. 21,18,846.32, at the assessment stage. Subsequently, certain forms were filed before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and the benefit of those forms were extended to it. It is an admitted fact that the dealer-opposite party could not file the requisite number of form C as stated in the returns. Resultantly for certain sales in respect of which the dealer-opposite party initially claimed concessional rate of tax, could not produce form...
Munni Lal Vs. Smt. Vimla Devi
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)AWC3227
ORDERAnjani Kumar, J.1. This writ petition filed by the petitioner who is the tenant of a portion on the ground floor and two rooms, latrine and bathroom and two rooms on the first floor of the shop in dispute, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order passed by prescribed authority dated 15.1.2002 and the order of the appellate authority dated 9.11.2004 under the provisions of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 (in short 'the Act').2. The facts leading to filing of the present writ petition are as under :That the respondent-landlady filed an application under Section 21(1)(a) of the Act for the release of the accommodation in question for her bona fide need. The aforesaid application was contested by the petitioner on the ground that the landlady does not have any requirement and further that the tilt of the comparative hardship is also in favour of the tenant. The prescribed authority after exchange of the pleadings and evidence on record by the parties allowed, the re...
Rajendra Kumar Karanwal Vs. Smt. Kamlesh Garg and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)AWC3858J
ORDERAnjani Kumar, J.1. The petitioner-tenant has challenged the order dated 24.3.2003, passed by the Special/Additional District Judge, Saharanpur in Civil Revision No. 11 of 1997 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition).2. The brief facts leading to filing of the writ petition are as under :Smt. Pramod Kumari and two minor children filed an application under Section 30(1) of the Act, in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Saharanpur, for depositing rent of the premises under their tenancy. The said application was registered as Misc. Case No. 14 of 1989. The respondent-landlord filed an objection to the aforesaid application filed by the tenant. The Civil Judge (Junior Division), Saharanpur, vide its order dated 22.11.1996, held that there is relationship of the landlord and tenant between the parties and directed the tenant to handover the amount of rent to the landlord and directed the landlord to give the receipt of the same and further observed that if the landlords refuse to ac...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›