Allahabad Court July 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Kumar Misra Vs. Superintendent, District Jail and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-03-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ3652
M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri D. S. Mishra learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Counsel for the respondents.2. This is a writ petition, which we are allowing with a heavy heart despite all our inclination to the contrary.3. The petitioner who has been elected MLA from the Samajwadi Party is challenging the impugned order of detention dated 24-4-2002 (Annexure-1 to the petition) passed under the National Security Act. Annexure-2 to the petition is the ground of detention, which mentions as many as 38 criminal cases against the petitioner. Of these, 8 cases are under Section 302, IPC, about 10 cases under Section 307, IPC and there are other cases under Section 376, IPC, 452, IPC and the U. P. Control of Goondas Act, Gangsters Act, Arms Act etc.4. The petitioner Vijay Kumar Mishra has been elected Member of the Legislative Assembly of U.P. in the recent election. This case illustrates the level of criminalisation that has taken place unfortunately in our public life. It i...
Ashok Kumar Rai Vs. District Inspector of Schools and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)AWC2353; (2002)3UPLBEC2533
S.K. Singh, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 10.10.2000 (Annexure-15) to the writ petition passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Ghazipur.2. There happens to be an Intermediate College known as Kedar Narain Krishak Inter College, Uchauri, district Ghazipur (herein-after referred to. as the college), which is recognised by the U. P . Board of High Schools and Intermediate Education Act which receives the grant-in-aid from the State Government. The petitioner claims to have been appointed as Assistant Teacher in C. T. grade on 4.10.1984 which was approved by the District Inspector of Schools . It is stated that as a policy decision, the C.T. grade was declared as dying cadre and as such, there remained only two cadres i.e., L.T. grade and Lecturer's grade. It has been stated in para 4 of the writ petition that the decision was made effective w.e.f. 1.1.1986, consequently, the petitioner started receiving all the benefits a...
Udai Prakash Bhartiya Vs. Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)AWC2391
Sudhir Narain and M.C, Jain, JJ.1. The petitioner has challenged the show cause notice dated 12th of April, 2002 Issued by the Deputy Director. Enforcement Directorate, Government of India, Kolkata, respondent No. 1 and has prayed for quashing further proceedings which may be initiated on the basis of the said notice.2. We have heard Sri Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vivek Mathur, Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.3. The petitioner is a Group 'B' Officer in the Department of Customs and Central Excise, Ministry of Finance, Government of India and is presently posted as Superintendent Central Excise at Headquarter, Allahabad. On 23rd October, 2000. C.B.I., Lucknow, had lodged a first information report showing the recovery of foreign exchange and illegal Indian currency from the possession of the petitioner and other custom staff members on duty. Thereafter, a show cause notice dated 12th April, 2002, was issued to the writ petitioner, w...
Deepak Nijhawan Vs. Vith Additional District and Sessions Judge and or ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)AWC2540
A.K. Yog, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. By means of the present petition under Article 226, Constitution of India, the tenant-petitioner seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 6.9.1999 passed by the Prescribed Authority/ respondent No. 2 appointed under Section 21 U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting. Rent and Eviction). Act. 1972. U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972 (for short called 'the Act'). whereby the application for the release of the accommodation has been allowed in favour of the landlord and the Judgment and the order dated 18.7.2000 passed by the Additional District Judge/respondent No. 1 affirming the above release order passed by the Prescribed Authority (Annexures-5 and 6 to the writ petition) and prayed that a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari be issued to quash the aforementioned impugned orders. 3. One R. N. Gupta (respondent No. 3). called 'the landlord' in the present petition, Initiated release pro...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›