Allahabad Court April 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Charan Singh and Sons and Another Vs. Assistant Sugar Commissioner, Me ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(2)AWC1703
M.C. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges an order dated 25th August. 1998, passed by the Khandsari inspector-cum-Assessing Officer whereby he rejected the petitioner's option exercised by him in terms of Section 3 (I-a) of the U. P. Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act. 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Rule 13A of the U. P. Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Rules. 1961 ; an assessment order dated 7th September. 1998 and the appellate order dated 25th September. 1998.2. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged.3. I have heard Sri M. K. Gupta learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. D. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.4. The petitioner owns a sugar unit and was liable to pay sugarcane purchase tax under the aforesaid Act. Section 3 (1-a) of the Act provides that the State Government may prescribe the quantity of sugarcane which shall be assumed for the purposes of the proviso to subsection...
NaraIn Singh and Charan Singh Vs. Additional Commissioner, Meerut and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)AWC1931
R.H. Zaidi, J,1. By means of this petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners pray for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 20.2.1998 passed by the Assistant Collector (1stClass) Meerut, setting aside the orders dated 18.6.1997 and 21.6.1997 and remanding the case to the Tahsildar, Meerut, to decide afresh after affording an opportunity, of hearing to the parties in accordance with law and the order dated 9.2.1999 dismissing the revision filed under Section 219 of U. P. Land Revenue Act passed by Additional Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut.2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel.3. It appears that petitioners filed 2 suits under Section 229B of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (for short 'the Act') for declaration that they were co-tenure holders in the land tn dispute, their share being 1/6 each. It was pleaded that the land in dispute was ...
Boby Alias Ravikant Sharma Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-01-1999
Reported in: 1999CriLJ2758
ORDERM.L. Singhal, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the accused applicant. The accused applicant Boby alias Ravikant has applied for bail under Section 302/ 120B of the IPC. Heard learned A.G.A. for the state.2. The right to a speedy trial implicit in Article 211 of the Constitution of India. The accused applicant is in jail since August, 1997. The copy of the order sheet of the case filed by the learned counsel for the accused applicant shows that not a single witness has yet been examined on be-half of the prosecution and next date fixed in the case is 3rd July, 1999.3. The accused applicant Boby alias Ravikant in case Crime No. 290 of 1997 under Section 302, 120B, IPC, P.S. Civil Lines, Muzaffarnagar, District MuzaffarNagar shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned....
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›