Boby Alias Ravikant Sharma Vs. State of U.P.

Boby Alias Ravikant Sharma vs State of U.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Apr 01, 1999

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/490013

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/490013
Court: Allahabad High Court
Judge: M.L. Singhal, J.
Decided On: Apr 01, 1999
Case Number: Criminal Misc. Second Bail Appln. No. 722 of 1999
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 [C.A. No. 1/1894]. Section 4; [Sushil Harkauli, S.K. Singh & Krishna Murari, JJ] Acquisition of land Held, Court cannot issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the State Authorities to acquire a particular land. Land acquisition is not purely ministerial act to be performed by executive No...

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Constitution of India - Article 211

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Boby Alias Ravikant Sharma

Advocate Nalin Kumar Sharma, Adv.

Respondent

State of U.P.

Advocate A.G.A.

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Constitution of India - Article 211
Reported In: 1999CriLJ2758

Excerpt

.....with the statutory provisions, perhaps even within a reasonable time frame. however, the power of the court under article 226 must necessarily stop at that. thereafter, if the decision taken by the executive is capable of challenge and, there exist appropriate legal grounds for such challenge, it may also be open to the court to quash the decision and to require reconsideration. but no direction in the nature of mandamus whether interim or final can be issued by the court under article 226 to the executive to necessarily acquire a particular area of a particular piece of land for a particular public purpose. section 4; compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held, renewal of lease in favour of petitioners would not take away power of state government of compulsory acquisition of land. renewal of lease would at best be taken into consideration for determining quantum of compensation. - civil lines, muzaffarnagar, district muzaffarnagar shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate concerned.orderm.l. singhal, j.1. heard learned counsel for the accused applicant. the accused applicant boby alias ravikant has applied for bail under section 302/ 120b of the ipc. heard learned a.g.a. for the state.2. the right to a speedy trial implicit in article 211 of the constitution of india. the accused applicant is in jail since august, 1997. the copy of the order sheet of the case filed by the learned counsel for the accused applicant shows that not a single witness has yet been examined on be-half of the prosecution and next date fixed in the case is 3rd july, 1999.3. the accused applicant boby alias ravikant in case crime no. 290 of 1997 under section 302, 120b, ipc, p.s. civil lines, muzaffarnagar, district muzaffarnagar shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate concerned.

Full Judgment

ORDER

M.L. Singhal, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the accused applicant. The accused applicant Boby alias Ravikant has applied for bail under Section 302/ 120B of the IPC. Heard learned A.G.A. for the state.

2. The right to a speedy trial implicit in Article 211 of the Constitution of India. The accused applicant is in jail since August, 1997. The copy of the order sheet of the case filed by the learned counsel for the accused applicant shows that not a single witness has yet been examined on be-half of the prosecution and next date fixed in the case is 3rd July, 1999.

3. The accused applicant Boby alias Ravikant in case Crime No. 290 of 1997 under Section 302, 120B, IPC, P.S. Civil Lines, Muzaffarnagar, District MuzaffarNagar shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.

Same Court & Year Allahabad · 1999 Same Parties Boby Alias Ravikant Sharma vs State of U.P. Same Subject Criminal Same Judge M.L. Singhal, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Constitution...

Criminal