Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Pubs: air2000sc1 · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.023 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 27 2000

Surendra Chauhan Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 314; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 136; Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Sections 3 and 4; Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 1975 - Rule 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2000SC1436; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)869; 2000CriLJ1789; JT2000(3)SC507; 2000(2)MPHT421; RLW2000(2)SC340; 2000(2)SCALE513; (2000)4SCC110; [2000]2SCR515; 2000(2)LC898(SC)

D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. Appellant Surendra Chauhan (Chauhan) has been convicted for ah offence under Sections 314/34, Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and a fine of Rs. 10.000/- and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2000

M/S. Haldiram Bhujiawala and Another Vs. M/S. Anand Kumar Deepak Kumar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-28-2000

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 2 and 69(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Trade Marks Act; Registration of Business Names Act, 1916 - Sections 7 and 8; Business Names Act, 1985; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Transfer of Property Act

Reported in : AIR2000SC1287; 84(2000)DLT301(SC); JT2000(2)SC596; (2000)IIMLJ159(SC); 2000(2)SCALE177; (2000)3SCC250; [2000]1SCR1247; 2000(1)LC603(SC)

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred by the two defendants, M/s. Haldiram Bhujiawala and Sri Ashok Kumar against the judgment of the Delhi High Court in FAO 365 of 1999 dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2000

M/S. Nathpa Jhakri Jt. Venture Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2000

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1968 - Sections 12A; Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules - Rule 31-A; Orissa Sales Tax Act - Sections 6 and 13-AA; Companies Act, 1956; Bihar Sales Tax Act; Societies Registration Act, 1860

Reported in : AIR2000SC1268; JT2000(3)SC189; 2000(2)SCALE352; (2000)3SCC319; [2000]118STC306(SC)

ORDERCIVIL APPEAL NO. 8468 OF 19971. The appellant before us called in question the validity of Section 12-A of the Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1968 [hereinafter referred as 'the Act'] and Rule 31-A of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 29 2000

Nar Singh Pal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2000

Subject : Labour and IndustrialService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 324, 427 and 504; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25F

Reported in : AIR2000SC1401; 84(2000)DLT31(SC); [2000(85)FLR458]; JT2000(3)SC593; (2000)ILLJ1388SC; 2000(2)SCALE685; (2000)3SCC588; [2000]2SCR752; (2000)2UPLBEC1298

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Leave granted.2 The appellant, who was engaged as casual labour in October, 1982 by the Telecom Department at Agra, had worked continuously as such for more than ten years and had also...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1999

Anil Hada Vs. Indian Acrylic Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-26-1999

Subject : CompanyBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1882 - Sections 138, 139 and 141; Companies Act, 1956; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 7 and 10; Water(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 44

Reported in : AIR2000SC145; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)736; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)25; 2000(1)ALLMR(SC)722; I(2006)BC143(SC); [2000]99CompCas36(SC); 2000CriLJ373; 2000(1)CTC94; JT1999(9)SC223; 2000(1)MPHT64

K.T. Thomas, J.1. Special Leave granted.2. When a company, which committed the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') eludes from being prosecuted thereof, can the Directors of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1999

Prasad Ramakant Khade Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-12-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Substance Act, 1908 - Sections 4 and 5; Terrorist And Desruptive Activities Act, 1987 - Sections 3(3), 4, 5, 6, 7 and 19

Reported in : AIR2000SC138; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)894; 2000CriLJ55; 1999(3)Crimes187(SC); JT1999(8)SC302; 1999(6)SCALE524; (1999)8SCC493; 2000(1)LC332(SC)

ORDERS.P. Kurdukar, J.1. The appellant along with Pravin Krishna Gawand (since deceased) and Sunil Dattaram Sawant (since absconding) were put up for trial for the offences punishable under Sections 3(3), 5 and 6 of the TADA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1999

Lal Chand and anr. Vs. District Judge, Agra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings - (Regulation of Letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 2(2) and 24(2); Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 1A, 7 and 19

Reported in : AIR2000SC141; JT1999(7)SC450; 1999(6)SCALE76; (1999)8SCC351; [1999]Supp2SCR664; 1999(2)LC1553(SC)

ORDER1. This appeal is preferred by the legal representative of Gian Chand, the original tenant who was sought to be evicted by the respondent-landlord in a regular Civil suit for eviction filed in 1976. According to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2000

Kush Sahgal and ors. Vs. M. C. Mitter and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-28-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : United Provinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 7F, 14 and 21; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925; Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, 1887; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rules 1 and 6; Utter Pradesh Civil Laws Amendment Act, 1972 - Sections 22; Utter Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 43(2); Utter Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 18, 19 and 20

Reported in : AIR2000SC1390; JT2000(3)SC563; 2000(2)SCALE593; (2000)4SCC526; [2000]2SCR648

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal involves a little interpretative effort. Not like Themis, blindfolded, but like Astraea, the Roman Goddess of justice holding a Scale (Balance) without folds on the eyes and occupying...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2000

Wellington Associates Ltd. Vs. Mr. Kirit Mehta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2000

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(b), 11 and 16; Arbitration Act, 1947 - Sections 34; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 33; UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules - Article 21

Reported in : AIR2000SC1379; 2000(3)ALLMR(SC)671; 2000(3)ALT2(SC); JT2000(4)SC135; (2000)3MLJ1(SC); 2000(3)SCALE23; (2000)4SCC272; 2000(2)LC1094(SC)

ORDER1. This is an application filed under Sub-clauses (2), (6), (10) and (12) of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called the Act). The application is made to the Chief Justice of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2000

Anandi D. Jadhav (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Nirmala Ramachandra Kore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-05-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11) and 13(1); Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 15 and 20; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1978

Reported in : AIR2000SC1386; (2000)3GLR2754; JT2000(4)SC96; 2000(3)SCALE90; (2000)3SCC703; [2000]2SCR963; 2000(2)LC810(SC)

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. This appeal raises an interesting question : whether on respondents 2 and 3, sons of the first respondent (tenant), building a house the appellants-landlords can seek eviction of the first-respondent under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial