Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Pubs: air1930cal1 · Page 1 of about 22 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 01 1929

BadaraddIn Mandal Vs. Nazir HossaIn Joaddar

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-01-1929

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1930Cal163,121Ind.Cas.744

1. In this case an under-raiyat applied to make a deposit under Section 170, Clause (3), Ben. Ten. Act, when the landlord decree-holder sought to put up to sale the holding of the occupancy raiyat under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1929

Provash Chandra Lahiri Vs. Municipal Commissioner of Howrah

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-23-1929

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1930Cal147a

1. This rule was issued to show cause why a certain order passed by the Subordinate Judge of Howrah on 24th May 1929, should not be set aside or such other or further order made as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1929

Kali Bilash Hazra Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-05-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1930Cal188

Graham, J.1. This is an appeal by one Kali Bilash Hazra who has been convicted by the unanimous verdict of the jury under Section 471, I.P.C., and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment. There was also...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 15 1929

DabiruddIn Mohammad and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-15-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1930Cal131

Rankin, C.J.1. In this case an order was made under Section 144, Criminal P.C., prohibiting the petitioners from exercising any act of possession in respect of a certain fishery. The Magistrate made this order on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1929

Emperor Vs. Balai Ghose and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-07-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1930Cal141,124Ind.Cas.486

Graham, J.1. This is a reference under Section 307, Criminal P.C. by the Additional Sessions Judge of Burdwan in connexion with a dacoity case which was tried by him in which the jury by a majority...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1929

In Re: Shib Charan Das

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-1929

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1930Cal150,121Ind.Cas.687

Lort-Williams, J.1. In my opinion, the law on this point is not sufficiently clear and definite to induce me to discharge this caveat.2. The next reversioner is an old man of 70 who has stated in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1929

In Re: Ramackers and Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-31-1929

Subject : Company

Reported in : AIR1930Cal146,122Ind.Cas.214

ORDERLort-Williams, J.1. In my opinion, the right construction of Section 104, Companies Act is that the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies should file the documents therein referred to when presented, in spite of the fact that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1929

Karnani Industrial Bank Ltd. Vs. Nawab Bahadur of Murshidabad

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-15-1929

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1930Cal159

Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion, the appeal must be allowed.2. The application is one by the Karnani Industrial Bank Limited who appear to be unsecured creditors of the respondent for a debt which was represented at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1929

Sunnat Mondal Vs. Makar Sheikh

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-23-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1930Cal138

Patterson, J.1. If the evidence is believed, the complainant's wife was enticed away by a woman named Hazari Bibi, was taken away from Hazari Bibi's house by the present accused and was then detained or concealed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 15 1929

Dhananjoy Pal and anr. Vs. Nagendra Sankar Roy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-15-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1930Cal144

Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion this rule must be made absolute. The Magistrate has not complied with the provisions of Section 139-A Criminal P.C., before proceeding to make relevant enquiry under Section 137. What happened was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial