Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Ramackers and Co. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jan 31, 1929
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/856077

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Companies Act (VII of 1918), Section 104 - Delay in filing return of allotment of shares--Duty of Registrar--Acceptance of documents by Registrar, effect of. -

Key legal issue
Company

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Ramackers and Co. Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1930Cal146,122Ind.Cas.214

Excerpt

companies act (vii of 1918), section 104 - delay in filing return of allotment of shares--duty of registrar--acceptance of documents by registrar, effect of. - orderlort-williams, j.1. in my opinion, the right construction of section 104, companies act is that the registrar of joint stock companies should file the documents therein referred to when presented, in spite of the fact that they have not been presented for filing within the month specified, and that he should inform the officer of the company, who presents the document for filing, that, unless, within a time to be specified by the registrar, the applicant obtains relief from the court, he (the registrar) will take steps to prosecute him for his default. the effect of accepting and filing the document is not to relieve the person in default from the liability imposed by the section, unless he obtains relief from the court for the whole period during which he was in default, with an order extending the time for filing up to the time when he actually did file the documents.2. with regard to the facts of this particular case, i am satisfied from the affidavits that, up to june 1927, this applicant was not aware of the provisions of the law, although that is not a reason for which the court will necessarily give relief, and i am satisfied also that, at that time, he was informed by the registrar that the documents could not be filed until he had obtained relief from the court. i am not sure that i ought to give him relief for the whole of the intervening period from june 1927, up to date, because, having been informed that it was necessary for him to obtain relief from the court before he could file this document, he took no step to obtain that relief for a considerable period. however, in all the circumstances, i think i am justified in granting relief. therefore, the time for filing these documents will be extended until the 14th february 1929.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Lort-Williams, J.

1. In my opinion, the right construction of Section 104, Companies Act is that the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies should file the documents therein referred to when presented, in spite of the fact that they have not been presented for filing within the month specified, and that he should inform the officer of the company, who presents the document for filing, that, unless, within a time to be specified by the Registrar, the applicant obtains relief from the Court, he (the Registrar) will take steps to prosecute him for his default. The effect of accepting and filing the document is not to relieve the person in default from the liability imposed by the section, unless he obtains relief from the Court for the whole period during which he was in default, with an order extending the time for filing up to the time when he actually did file the documents.

2. With regard to the facts of this particular case, I am satisfied from the affidavits that, up to June 1927, this applicant was not aware of the provisions of the law, although that is not a reason for which the Court will necessarily give relief, and I am satisfied also that, at that time, he was informed by the Registrar that the documents could not be filed until he had obtained relief from the Court. I am not sure that I ought to give him relief for the whole of the intervening period from June 1927, up to date, because, having been informed that it was necessary for him to obtain relief from the Court before he could file this document, he took no step to obtain that relief for a considerable period. However, in all the circumstances, I think I am justified in granting relief. Therefore, the time for filing these documents will be extended until the 14th February 1929.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial