Advanced Search Results
Langley Vs. D'arcy
Mumbai
Mar-05-1929
Civil
AIR1930Bom24; (1929)31BOMLR1020; 122Ind.Cas.121
Rangnekar, J.1. This is an application to review the taxation of the defendant-respondent's costs. The first five items objected to, are, in my opinion, items in regard to which there is no principle involved. It is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Shivputraya Baslingaya
Mumbai
Feb-25-1930
Criminal
AIR1930Bom244; (1930)32BOMLR574
Mirza, J.1. This is a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Belgaum, tinder Section 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case he tried with a jury in which the accused were charged with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagardas Mathuradas Vs. N.V. Velmahomed
Mumbai
Dec-09-1929
Contract
AIR1930Bom249; (1930)32BOMLR454
Blackwell, J.1. This suit as originally framed was a suit to recover the sum of Rs. 3,841-10-0 upon the basis that the defendant employed the plaintiffs as his commission agents on pakki adat terms. Alternatively, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›