Advanced Search Results

Committee of Management, Rama Devi Balika Inter College Vs. Mohd. Iqba ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2006All163; 2006(3)AWC2474

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kant and ;Vishal Agarwal, Advs.

ORDERUmeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard Sri Ravi Kant, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Vishal Agarwal.2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been moved challenging the order dated 26-11-2005 passed by the...

Neeta Prakash Modi Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev.), Mumbai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Vishal Agarwal, Advocate with for Appellant. Shri Sunil Nawandhar, C.A. Shri T. Tiju, SDR for Respondents.

Per : Ashok Jindal Neeta Prakash Modi - the appellant has filed this appeal against the order confirming absolute confiscation of diamonds weighing 154.04 carets under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant s...

Emerald Alchymicus P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Raigad

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Vishal Agarwal, Advocate for Appellants. Shri Sunil Nawandhar, C.A Shri N.A. Sayyad, JDR for Respondents.

Per : Ashok Jindal The appellant has filed this appeal against the confiscation of their imported goods which were allowed to redeem on payment of redemption fine and penalty. 2. The facts of the case are...

Neeta Prakash Modi Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Mumbai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant : Shri Vishal Agarwal, Advocate. For the Respondent : Shri Navneet, Additional Commissioner (AR).

Ashok Jindal: Heard as per the directions of the honble High Court of Bombay in Customs Appeal No. 86 of 2010 dated 06/01/2011. 2. The hon’ble High Court has observed as under: “3. In the present...

M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd. versus the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.1525

[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1525 : 2024 INSC 880 M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune (Civil Appeal No(s). 10409-10410 of 2014) 20 November 2024 [B.V. Nagarathna and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh,* JJ.] Issue...

Sharad Kumar Agarwal Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev),

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2002)(145)ELT344Tri(Mum.)bai

2. vide order dated 11/04/1967 the Additional Collector of Customs.Bombay confiscated absolutely 8000 tolas gold seized from Sharad Kumar P Agarwal travelling to Delhi at Bombay Central Station. The Central Board of Excise and Customs vide...

Nav Maharashtra Chakan Oil Mills Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2002)(104)LC549Tri(Mum.)bai

1.These two appeals have been filed against two different orders. C.165/91 has been filed against the decision of Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune made in Sr. No. 1/Cus/1991 dated 8.1.1991, whereunder the Collector had...

Goa Industrial Products, Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(181)ELT222Tri(Mum.)bai

1. All the three appeals are being disposed off by this common order as they arise out of he same impugned orders, passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise. Duty of Rs. 64.62 lakhs and 7.47...

Kinetic Engg. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

2. Shri Vishal Agarwal, ld. Chartered Accountant, appearing for the appellants states that the appellants received the material from the principal manufacturer for job work and returned the same without payment of duty following the procedure...

Pentair Water India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property

2. The appellants have filed a Bill of Entry No. 103393 dated 15.1.2000 under the EDI Scheme for clearance of 2000 kg. of Seamless extruded pipes which was assessed to duty and the duty was paid...