Advanced Search Results

V. Karthikeyan and Others Vs. State by S.i. of Police and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2948

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Sairam and ;P.M. Sundaram, Advs.

ORDER1. These two petitions are disposed of together by a common order, since the question raised is identical. 2. Both these petitions have been filed under S. 482, Cr.P.C. to call for the records in pending...

Prasath Vs. The Inspector of Police, Madurai and Another

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Sairam

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in P.R.C.No.27 of 2014 on the same pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and to quash the same...

Krishan Bai Vs. Arti Press

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas750(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Sairam, Adv.

Padmini Jesudurai, J. 1. The accused in C.C. No. 46 of 1990, pending trial before the Judicial Magistrate, Sivakasi, for an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as amended by the Act...

Thamilarasan Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2) and 313; Evidence Act - Sections 27

Reported in : 1996CriLJ274

Advocate for Appellant : V. Sairam, Adv.

Janarthanam, J. 1. The Appellant who was accused in S.C. No. 62 of 1987 on the file of Court of Session, South Arcot Division at Cuddalore, was found guilty under Section 302, I.P.C, convicted thereunder and...

Mohd. Buhari Vs. Rahamathunissa

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 25

Reported in : I(1992)DMC474; (1991)IIMLJ160

Advocate for Appellant : V. Sairam, Adv.

Nainar Sundaram, J.1. In this Letters Patent Appeal, the parents of two minor Muslim girls are quarrelling as between themselves for the guardianship of the person and custody of the said minor girls. Though in the...

M. Venugopal Vs. G. Manohar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 37, Rules 1, 3(2) and 3(4)

Reported in : AIR2005Mad35

Advocate for Appellant : V. Sairam, Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Defendant in O.S. No. 7187 of 1993 on the file of XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, against the dismissal of his petition in I.A. No. 11452 of 1995 filed under Order...

P. Tamilarasan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Commissioner and Secret ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 -- Sections 4 (1), 5-A, 12 (2), 60 and 66

Reported in : AIR1999Mad282; 1999(1)CTC586

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Sairam, Adv.

ORDER1. Aggrieved by the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents, the petitioner has filed the above writ petition. 2. The case of the petitioner is as follows: He purchased under Registered Sale Deed dated 31.12.1986...

A. Balasubramania Pillai Vs. the General Manager, Tamil Nadu Small Ind ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1996)IILLJ224Mad; (1996)IMLJ59

Advocate for Appellant : V. Sairam, Adv.

A.C. Lakshmanan, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition for the issue of writ of certiorari to quash the order of the 1 st respondent in his Proceedings No. 4068/EA 3/88 dated February...

Palanivel Vs The union of India

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Palanivel Petitioner(s) Vs1. The union of IndiaRep by Union Territory of Puducherry by Chief Secretary, chief secretariat, 2.The Special Secretary (Revenue) Cum...

V.G. Loganathan Vs. M. Balakrishnan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : (2000)1MLJ373

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Rajagopal, Sr. Counsel for ;T.R. Rajaraman, Adv.

ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. These revision petitions arise under peculiar circumstances. Petitioner, who is not a co-nominee party in the suit but who is really affected person has filed this revision. He has come to Court with...