Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v n damle · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 08 2008

Balbhim Ramchandra Kedar, Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Ma ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-08-2008

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 10, 12, 15, 15(2) and 20; SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 249, 340 and 345; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 143, 147, 166, 167, 178, 179, 180, 211, 217, 218, 219, 228, 307, 323, 324 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Contempt of Courts (Bombay High Court) Rules, 1975 - Rule 6

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR1324; 2008CriLJ3249

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Damle, Amicus Curiae

Naresh H. Patil, J.1. This is a reference made under Section 15(2) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 by Shri. Balbhim Ramchandra Kedar, Civil Judge Junior Division & Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhusawal, District Jalgaon...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2004

Babasaheb Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-16-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32

Reported in : II(2004)DMC457

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Damle, Adv. for ;V.D. Hon, Adv.

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. In Sessions Case No. 78 of 1984 the appellant-original accused was put on trial for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and by his judgment and order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2001

indya Sega Valvi Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-03-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 134; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300, 302 and 400; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 161

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)2360; 2001CriLJ4804

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Damle, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this Appeal, the Appellant challenges the Judgment and Order dated 30th September, 1994 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 36 of 1994, whereby he has been convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 06 2003

Madhavgir S/O Gururatangir Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 304; Evidence Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj161

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Damale, Adv.

A.S. Bagga, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18-8-1998, passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded in Sessions Case No. 126 of 1997, thereby convicting the appellant/original accused for the offence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2006

Shri. Ashok S/O Laxman Kale Vs. Sau. Ujwala W/O Ashok Kale

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 19; Specific Relief Act - Sections 7; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 111; Suits Valuation Act - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 16 to 21, 21(1), 86 and 99

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR588; 2007(1)BomCR16

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Kale-Patil, Adv.

P.R. Borkar, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the original respondent, directed against the order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad in Petition No. B-19 of 2004 decided on 4.7.2005, to return Stridhan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2008

Bakshisingh S/O Sahelsingh Vs. the State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-2008

Subject : PropertyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 420, 463, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197 and 482

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2420

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Damle, ;A.H. Kapadia and ;Hemant Kumar Pawar, Advs.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Both these applications filed Under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. are being disposed of together. For, they arise out of same set of fact situation. The applicants seek quashing of F.I.R. dated 14.6.2004...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2002

Bishansing Thakursing Vs. Nasira Kadar Shaikh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A and 110B

Reported in : 2003ACJ1458; 2003(1)MhLj68

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Damle, Adv., i/b., ;A.H. Kapadia, Adv.

A.B. Naik, J.1. The First Appeal Nos. 153 and 156 of 1984 can be disposed of by the common judgment as this relates to the accident which took place on 14-11-1978. The facts involved in these...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2000

Anand Chintamani Dighe and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through I ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-19-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1), 21 and 226; Criminal Proceudre Code, 1973 - Sections 95, 99D and 144; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124-A, 153A, 292, 293 and 295A

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2203

Advocate for Appellant : Shri V.N. Damle, ;Shri D.K. Ghaisas and ;Shri P.V. Bapat, Advs.

Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, J.1. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is filed by a social worker who is the 1st Petitioner and by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1982

Sohan Mahabir Prasad Saha and anr. Vs. Shyam Sunder Sevramdas Bidawata ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-08-1982

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR13

Advocate for Appellant : Porus Mehta and ;Bhaskar N. Mehta, Advs.;For State: V.N. Damle, P.P.

S.J. Deshpande, J.1. The petitioners are a company who are exporters and importers, carrying on business of garments. Petitioner No. 1 is the son and petitioner No. 2 is the mother. Respondent No. 1 is also...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 1973

Mohamed Salim SamsuddIn and ors. Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Offi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-27-1973

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9(2), 18, 23, 23(4) and 25(2)

Reported in : AIR1975Bom53; (1974)76BOMLR519; ILR1975Bom227

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Paranjpe, ;V.N. Damle and ;V.N. Gadgil, Advs. in F.A. No. 235 of 1964 and ;V.T. Gambhirwala, Asstt. Govt. Pleader in F.A. No. 355 of 1964

Tulzapurkar, Ag.C.J. 1. These appeals arise out of the land acquisition proceedings which were initiated at the instance of the Executive Engineer. Irrigation Division, Nasik, for acquiring certain lands comprised in different survey numbers situate at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial