Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: uday lalit · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.059 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 19 2008

Aditya Khanna Vs. the Regional Passport Officer/Passport Authority

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-19-2008

Subject : FEMA

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 37(3); Income Tax Act - Sections 131; Passport Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 10(3), 10(3)(1), 10(5), 10(9), 10A, 10A(1) and 11; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18AA; Orissa Municipal Act - Sections 417A; Himachal Act - Sections 256; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 91 and 104; Indian Penal Code; Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings) Rules, 2000 - Rule 4; Passports Rules, 1980 - Rule 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT172

Advocate for Appellant : Uday Lalit, Sr. Adv. and; Atul Nanda, Adv

Gita Mittal, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by Aditya Khanna assailing the action of the respondents in revoking his passport bearing No. F 4812183 without issuance of a notice to show cause and grant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2011

B.S. Yeddyurappa Vs. State of Karnataka, Through Superintendent of Pol ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-26-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Uday Lalit - SR. Counsel along with Sandeep Patil and MRS. Vijetha Naik Patil, Advocates. For the Respondents: -----------

(PRAYER: THESE WRIT PETITIONS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT IN PCR NO.18/2011 FILED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 BEFORE THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR LOKAYUKTA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2013

D N Taneja Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Uday Lalit, Mr. N. Hariharan, Mr. Bhanoo Sood, Mr. Yogesh Dahiya

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:18. h February, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 552/2013 D N TANEJA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Uday Lalit, Sr. Advocate with Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 21 2003

Educate India Society Vs. All India Council for Technical Education

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-21-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 4, 10 and 23

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)91; 108(2003)DLT274

Advocate for Appellant : Uday Lalit,; Gaurav Aggarwal and; Prasanjit Keswani, Ad

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. Rule.2. Since the facts that are germane for deciding this Petition are not in controversy, learned counsel for the parties have consented to the final disposal of the Writ Petition itself. Arguments have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2019

M/S Prosafe International Private Limited vs.m/s Oil and Natural Gas C ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-06-2019

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shreeyash Uday Lalit

$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 33/2019 M/S PROSAFE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shreeyash Uday Lalit, Adv versus M/S OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2008

Ghanta Infrastructures Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-23-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1941 - Sections 22 and 22(3); Assam Control Order, 1961; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 79; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19(1), 32, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of the Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 78(2) and 81; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4A, 81, 91, 100, 190, 224 to 233, 235 to 351, 391-394, 433, 617, 619 and 643; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Industrial Courts Act, 1919; Industries (Development and Regulation Act, 1951; International Finance Corporation (Status, Immunities and Privileges) Act, 1958; Madras Agriculturalists' Relief Act; Recovery of

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT611

Advocate for Appellant : Uday Lalit, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court issued rule nisi on 19-4-2007.2. Counter affidavits, additional affidavits and reply affidavits were filed and written arguments also were submitted in addition to the submissions made by the respective Counsel in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2007

Ch. Jagjit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-15-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3547

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Uday Lalit

ORDERRanjit Singh, J.1. By this common order, the abovesaid three Criminal Misc. Petitions are being dealt with as the same have arisen from the same FIR. The facts are being taken from Criminal Misc. No. 27116-M...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2009

A.P. Civil Liberties Committee (Apclc) Rep. by Its President, Mr. S. S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-06-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 6, 6(3), 8(1) and 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 21, 25, 81, 105, 123, 145 and 157; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; APPS - Sections 8; Commission of Inquiries Act, 1962; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 106, 106(2) and 155; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 108; Ku Klux Klan Act, 1871; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 34, 52A, 76 to 106, 135, 147, 148, 149, 201, 202, 203, 204, 216, 217, 221, 299, 300, 302, 304, 304A, 307, 332, 408, 420, 452, 499, 500 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 37, 39, 40, 41, 43, 46, 46(1), 46(2), 46(3), 129 to 132, 132(1), 132, 132(2), 133, 134, 149, 151, 152, 153(3), 154, 154(1), 154(2), 154(3), 155, 156, 156(1), 156(3), 1

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT754

Advocate for Appellant : Bojja Tarakam, Sr. Counsel, ;D. Suresh Kumar, ;K. Balagopal, ;K.G. Kannabiran, Sr. Counsel, ;V. Raghunath, ;Balla Ravindranath and ;Kolla Savithri Devi, Advs.;C. Padmanabha Reddy, Sr. Counsel

ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.Competing interpretations of recurrent-contemporaneous events:1. Since the inception of the naxalite movement in Andhra Pradesh in 1969, 551 police personnel were killed including one DIG, two S.Ps, five D.S.Ps; 16 Inspectors and 49 Sub-Inspectors....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 2006

Laxmi Sharma and ors. Vs. V.C., Chhatrapati Sahuji Maharaj University ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-23-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State University Act - Sections 37(2)

Reported in : AIR2006SC3619; 2006(5)ALD66(SC); JT2006(6)SC13; 2006(6)SCALE493; (2006)9SCC138; 2006(2)LC824(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : U.U. Lalit, Sr. Adv.,; Pooja Dhar,; Prashant Kumar and;

Altamas Kabir, J.1. The appellants in Civil Appeal Nos. 5147-5148/2005 were admitted as students by the Himalaya Ayurvedic Mahavidyalaya between 1992 to 1995 in its Medical College being the appellant in Civil Appeal Nos. 5149-5150/2005. Inasmuch...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2000

Sadashiv H. Patil Vs. Vithal D. Teke and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-31-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3(1), 7 and 9; Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rules 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961- Sections 57

Reported in : AIR2000SC3044; JT2000(9)SC604; 2000(6)SCALE209; (2000)8SCC82; 2000(2)LC1335(SC); 2001(1)MhLJ312

ORDERR.C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted in S.L.P.(C)No. 21085 of 1998. 2. In all these appeals the controversy arising for decision is whether certain members of the municipal council have incurred disqualification on ground of defection. 3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial