Advanced Search Results
A. Aziz Vs. Managing Director, Ksrtc
Karnataka
Mar-25-1986
CivilService
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 32 and 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1978 - Sections 25F
ILR1986KAR2007
V. Lakshminarayana, Adv.
ORDERBopanna, J.1. These petitions are disposed of by a common order since a common question arises for consideration in all these petitions.2. The petitioners are all Ex badli conductors of the 1st respondent/Corporation. Their services were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHegde and Golay Limited and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and C ...
Karnataka
Jan-02-1986
Excise
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25; Central Excise Act; Central Excise Rules - Rule 8(1)
1986(7)ECC140; 1986(25)ELT47(Kar)
G. Sarangan and ;J.N.S. Prasad, Advs.
ORDERS.R. Rajasekhara Murthy, J.1. The Petitioner-Company, which is a manufacturer of watches, imported certain components for the purpose of manufacture of watches in its factory.2. The Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Bangalore levied additional duty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoseph Vs. Registrar, Mangalore University
Karnataka
Mar-24-1986
ConstitutionCivil
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 10
S. Vijayashankar, Adv.
ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have sought for quashing the communications dated 25-1-1986 bearing No. P.O.4326/85-86 and P.O.4327/ 85-86 addressed to the petitioners produced as Annexures A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sudershan Boury and Etc. Vs. the Director of Enforcement, New Delhi
Karnataka
Sep-25-1981
Fera
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 50 and 54; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1) and 9
AIR1982Kant135; [1982]52CompCas305a(Kar); ILR1982KAR280
K.R.D. Karanth, Adv.
Sabhahit, J.1. These two appeals are directed against the common order dated 18-10-78, passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, in appeal Nos. 1464/1977 and 142/1978, on its file, reducing the penalty against the husband...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSukumar and ors. Vs. State and ors.
Karnataka
Oct-12-1971
Criminal
1972CriLJ1402
Sri. Shivashankar Bhat
ORDERS.R. Range Gowda, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the two preliminary orders dated 10-8-1971 and 17-8-1971 passed by the Additional District Magistrate Man-galore in M. C. No. 1 of 1971. The first order relates...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHegde and Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs
Karnataka
Jan-02-1986
Customs
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25
ILR1987KAR604
G. Sarangan and ;J.N.S. Prasad, Advs.
Rajasekhara Murthy, J.1. The petitioner-Company, which is a manufacturer of watch as, imported certain components for the purpose of manufacture of watches in its factory.2. The Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Bangalore levied additional duty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.G.E.F. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore
Karnataka
Jul-17-1985
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 56A and 56A(7)
1985(6)ECC68; 1986(6)LC127(Karnataka); 1985(22)ELT705(Kar); [1986]160ITR829(KAR); [1986]160ITR829(Karn)
G. Sarangan, Adv.
1. The petitioner - M/s. N.G.E.F. Ltd. a Government of Karnataka undertaking, has challenged the Endorsement issued by the Asst. Collector, Central Excise, East Division, Bangalore, dated 18-7-1981 (Anx-E). 2. The petitioner-company manufactures essentially among other...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.M. Pattanaik Vs. Secretary to Government of India
Karnataka
Nov-05-1986
Labour and Industrial
>Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 33; he Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(4), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 6(3), 6(4), 6(7), 9, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 22(3), 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 29(1)
ILR1986KAR3954; (1987)IILLJ113Kant
Shri. G. P. Shivaprakash
ORDER1. In this Writ Petition in which the petitioner, a member of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS for short), has questioned the constitutional validity of Clauses (b) and (c) of the proviso to Rule 5(a) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaharashtra Apex Corporation Ltd. Vs. Poovappa Salian and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-06-1984
CommercialContract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 135, 140 and 141
AIR1985Kant116
K. Shivashankar Bhat, Adv.
ORDER1. This is a revision by the decree-holder Bank against the order dt. 3-9-1979 passed by the First Additional Civil Judge, Mangalore, in Execution Case No. 112 of 1977 allowing I. A. IX and dismissing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaharashtra Apex Corporation Ltd. Vs. Poovappa and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-06-1984
Contract
Contract Act, 1872, - Sections 135, 140 and 141
ILR1985KAR255
K. Shivashankar Bhat, Adv.
ORDERKulkarni, J.1. This is a revision by the decree-holder-Bank against the order dated 3-9-1979 passed by the First Additional Civil Judge, Mangalore, in Execution Case No. 112 of 1977 allowing I.A.IX and dismissing the execution.2. Judgment-debtor...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »