Advanced Search Results
Panmal Lodha and anr. Vs. Omraomal Lodha and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-05-1952
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103 and 114
AIR1953Cal244
R. Goho, Adv. for Receiver, ;Special Referee and Commissioner of Partition; ;Sankar Banerjee, ;B.K. Ghosh and ;S.K. Acharya, Advs. for ;Sobhagmal Lodha, Adv., ;A.C. Bhabra, Adv. for ;Manmohan Lal Lodh
ORDERSinha, J. 1. This is an application by the defendant Sobhagmal Lobha for several reliefs the most important being a direction upon the Special Referee to make a special Report. A few facts must be stated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirdhari Lal Nannelal Vs. the Sales Tax Commissioner, M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-01-1976
Sales Tax
Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 44
AIR1977SC298a; [1977]109ITR726(SC); (1976)3SCC701; [1977]39STC30(SC)
Sobhagmal Jain,; I. Makwana and; V.K. Jain, Advs
H.R. Khanna, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court whereby the High Court answered a number of questions referred to it under Section 44 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSambhu Kar Vs. State of W.B.
Supreme Court of India
Jun-06-1972
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 22(5)
AIR1973SC959; 1973CriLJ382; (1972)2SCC588; 1973(5)LC157(SC)
Khanna, J.1. This is a petition through jail by Sambhu Kar, who has been ordered by the District Magistrate Burdwen to be detained under Section 3 of the Maintenance of internal Security Act, 1971 (Act 26...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok Kumar Vs. Basantilal and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-15-1984
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 100
AIR1985MP179
S.D. Sanghi, Adv.
G.G. Sohani, J. 1. This is defendant's second appeal arising out of a suit instituted by plaintiffs-respondents 1 to 4 for partition. Briefly, the plaintiffs' case was that the plaintiffs and defendant 1 Sobhagmal were brothers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNemi Chand and anr. Vs. the Edward Mills Co. Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-10-1952
Civil
Court-Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 - Order 7, Rule 11
AIR1953SC28; 1953(1)BLJR115; (1953)IMLJ117(SC); [1953]4SCR197
Mahajan, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave granted by the Privy Council and limited to the question of court-fee, viz., whether on the memorandum of appeal presented to the High Court court-fee was payable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasantilal Vs. Mt. Sajjan Devi and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-03-1973
Civil
Rajasthan Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961 - Sections 39 and 48(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 48 - Order 21, Rules 58 and 63
AIR1974Raj26
K.N. Tikku, Adv.
B.P. Beri, C.J. 1. Appellant Basantilal valued this appeal at Rs. 20,000/-and therefore, the Registrar by his order dated August 18. 1972, admitted it. An ad interim injunction was claimed for which notice was issued to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHet Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Mar-21-1990
CriminalFamily
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125
II(1991)DMC206
M.L. Garg, Adv.
Sobhagmal Jain, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This petition is against the order dated June 16, 1989, passed by the Additional Munsif & Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar, granting interim maintenance of Rs. 300/- per...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Poongalia JaIn Swetamber Mandir Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Rajasthan
May-19-1987
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11, 12, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3) and 244
(1987)65CTR(Raj)38; [1987]168ITR516(Raj)
T.C. Jain, Adv.
Agrawal, J.1. In these references relating to the assessment years 1972-73, 1973-74 and 1974-75, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as ' the Tribunal'), has referred the following questions for the opinion...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasanti Lal Vs. Mst. Sajjan Devi and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-03-1973
Civil
1973(6)WLN651
Mr. Tikku
B.P. Beri, C.J.1. Appellant Basantilal valued this appeal at Rs. 20,000/-and, therefore, the Registrar by his order dated August 18, 1972, admitted it. An add interim injunction was clamed for which notice was issued to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Premchand
Rajasthan
Dec-07-1972
Service
1972WLN1091
J.P. Jain, J.1. Union of India has filed this appeal against the appellate judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Ajmer dated 26th August, 1970 by which the decree passed by the Munsif, Ajmer City (East)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »