Het Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Het Ram vs State of Rajasthan and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 21, 1990

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/754802

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/754802
Court: Rajasthan High Court
Judge: Sobhagmal Jain, J.
Decided On: Mar 21, 1990
Case Number: S.B. Crl. Misc. Petition No. 347 of 1989
Subject: Criminal;Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Criminal;Family
Acts & sections: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Het Ram

Advocate M.L. Garg, Adv.

Respondent

State of Rajasthan and anr.

Advocate B.R. Arora, Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125
Reported In: II(1991)DMC206

Excerpt

- sobhagmal jain, j.1. heard learned counsel for the parties. this petition is against the order dated june 16, 1989, passed by the additional munsif & judicial magistrate, sri ganganagar, granting interim maintenance of rs. 300/- per month to smt. tulsi bai and rs. 100/- per month to her daughter. 2. having regard to the facts and circumstances o.' the case, it seems reasonable to me that the interim maintenance directed to be paid to smt. tulsi bai should be rs, 150/- per month. accordingly, it is directed that the interim maintenance to be paid to smt. tulsi bai shall be rs. 150/- p.m. however, the interim maintenance to be paid to her daughter at the rate of rs. 100/- per month is, maintained. with this modification of the order of the learned magistrate the present petition shall stand disposed of. 3. the learned trial court shall decide the main petition within six months from today. the order passed by this court shall not affect or otherwise come in the way of the final order that may be passed by the trial court.

Full Judgment

Sobhagmal Jain, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This petition is against the order dated June 16, 1989, passed by the Additional Munsif & Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar, granting interim maintenance of Rs. 300/- per month to Smt. Tulsi Bai and Rs. 100/- per month to her daughter.

2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances o.' the case, it seems reasonable to me that the interim maintenance directed to be paid to Smt. Tulsi Bai should be Rs, 150/- per month. Accordingly, it is directed that the interim maintenance to be paid to Smt. Tulsi Bai shall be Rs. 150/- p.m. However, the interim maintenance to be paid to her daughter at the rate of Rs. 100/- per month is, maintained. With this modification of the order of the learned Magistrate the present petition shall stand disposed of.

3. The learned trial Court shall decide the main petition within six months from today. The order passed by this Court shall not affect or otherwise come in the way of the final order that may be passed by the trial Court.

Same Court & Year Rajasthan · 1990 Same Parties Het Ram vs State of Rajasthan and anr. Same Subject Criminal;Family Same Judge Sobhagmal Jain, J. Acts & Sections Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Criminal;Family