Advanced Search Results
Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of ...
Mumbai
Sep-05-2003
Direct Taxation
Maharashtra Co-operative Act, 1961 - Sections 2(19); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 119 and 194A(3); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(19)
2003(4)ALLMR966; 2004(2)BomCR88; [2004]265ITR423(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj353
P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel and ;P.V. Barde, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 563 of 2003 and ;A.G. Talhar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 2261 of 2003
B. B. Vagyani, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was enacted with a view to provide for orderly development of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union ...
Mumbai
Sep-05-2003
Direct Taxation
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(19); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 119 and 194A(3)
(2003)184CTR(Bom)343
P.M. Shah, ;P.V. Barde and ;A.G. Talhar, Advs.
B.B. Vagyani, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with consent of parties, taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was enacted with a view to provide for orderly development of the co-operative...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGoverdhandas Mulchand Agrawal and ors. Vs. Bherulal Uderam Bagade and ...
Mumbai
Sep-03-2004
CivilTenancy
Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108(O); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 13(2)
2005(3)MhLj196
S.B. Agrawal, Adv. for petitioners Nos. 1, 2-a to 2-d, 3 and 4
S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment and order dated 10-2-1987 in Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1984. The judgment under challenge affirms the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Roopa Vs. Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and anr.
Rajasthan
Apr-07-1986
Labour and Industrial
1986(2)WLN195
Suresh Chandra Agrawal, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner, Roopa, has challenged the Award (Annexure 4) dated 11th October, 1984 made by the Labour Court, Jaipur to the extent the Labour Court has denied back...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Ajij Puddan Ansari Vs. Jubedabai W/O Abdul Ajij and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-01-1982
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125(1) and 125(3)
1982(1)BomCR504
P.M. Shah, Adv.;J.A. Barday, Adv.
M.L. Pandse, J.1. This is an application filed by the husband to challenge the legality of the order dated July 10, 1981 passed by the II Joint Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhule, and the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarivilas Madhavprasad Ruia Vs. Viraf Ardeshir Udwadia and Others
Mumbai
Sep-29-1993
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 104, 104(1), 105 and 106 - Order 39, Rule 2-A - Order 41 - Order 43
AIR1994Bom38; 1994(1)BomCR366; (1993)95BOMLR592; 1993(2)MhLj1435
Navin B. Shah
1. By an order dated 27th February, 1992 the learned Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Bombay, made the notice partly absolute holding the petitioner guilty of flouting the order of injunction and also passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShailesh Harinarayan Bajaj Vs. Creative Garments Limited and Another
Mumbai
Aug-17-1999
CivilLimitation
Presidency Towns Insolvancy Act, 1909 - Sections 9 and 90(5); Bombay Insolvancy Rules, 1910 - Rule 52-B(5); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5
2000(1)BomCR146
N.H. Seerwai and ;A.A. Joglekar with ;S.S. Shah i/b ;M.& M. Legal Venture, Advs.;P.V. Shah and ;G.B. Kedia, Advs.
ORDERSmt. K.K. Baam, J.1. This Notice of Motion has been taken out on behalf of the applicant/Judgment Debtor praying that it may be held that the applicant has not committed any act of insolvency in Notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Education and Information Films Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Aug-01-1990
Customs
Central Excise Act; Customs Act - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 226
1993LC237(Bombay); 1991(51)ELT216(Bom)
Shri D.J. Dalal, Adv., i/b.,;M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co.
Rule, returnable forthwith.Shri Shah waives service on behalf of the respondent.Heard counsel.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, legality of order dated January 22, 1990 passed by Customs, Excise and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLyphIn Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Jun-15-1993
Customs
Customs Act - Sections 46
1993LC21(Bombay); 1993(66)ELT572(Bom)
Shri Jerry Lewis and ;Shri W.N. Deshpande, Advs.
Pendse, J.1. The petitioner are a private limited company and on September 28, 1981, imported 1980 kgs. of D2- amino-1 Butane air. The petitioner initially filed bill of entry for home consumption but could not make...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.N. Lakhani Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay
Mumbai
Mar-14-1990
Constitution
1990(2)BomCR594
Aspi Chinoy, ;Percy Gandhy and ;Vijay Rajput, Advs., i/b., N.G Pandya, Adv.
V.S. Kotwal, J.1 The point involved is quite short, though the field of debate has been expanded on account of certain interpretation that is sought to be put by learned Counsel for both sides. Narration of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »